生鲜食品加工表面单核增生李斯特菌的形成与控制。

IF 2.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Aysu Deniz, Blanca Ruiz-Llacsahuanga, Faith Critzer, Dan L Boyle, Josefina Lacasa, Umut Yucel, Valentina Trinetta
{"title":"生鲜食品加工表面单核增生李斯特菌的形成与控制。","authors":"Aysu Deniz, Blanca Ruiz-Llacsahuanga, Faith Critzer, Dan L Boyle, Josefina Lacasa, Umut Yucel, Valentina Trinetta","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability of L. monocytogenes, a common foodborne pathogen, to form biofilms significantly contributes to its persistence and contamination risks. Understanding L. monocytogenes aggregation is crucial to develop effective control strategies. This study assessed the growth and accumulation of L. monocytogenes on common food processing surfaces in the produce industry and evaluated the efficacy of commercially available sanitizers alone or simultaneously with UV-C light for 30 s, 1 min, or 5 min. L. monocytogenes was allowed to aggregate on stainless steel, nylon, high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and Teflon for 24 h (initial biofilm aggregate) and 96 h (mature biofilms). Treatments included 120 ppm peracetic acid (PAA), silver dihydrogen citrate (SDC), 4% lactic acid, and UV-C light (254 nm). After sanitizer application, cells were dislodged and enumerated by serial dilution and plating. Confocal images were obtained before and after treatments to evaluate biofilm architecture. All liquid sanitizers significantly reduced L. monocytogenes independently of the surface type (P < 0.05). UV-C treatment application time had no significant effect on biofilm reduction (P > 0.05), though its efficacy on 24 h aggregates varied significantly depending on the surface material. Peracetic acid and lactic acid were the most effective treatments across surfaces, while UV-C alone was the least effective. Combined sanitizer and UV-C light application for up to 5 min did not necessarily improve treatment efficacy compared to sanitizers alone. Confocal images displayed surface cleanability and alterations in microbial architecture before and after treatments. Mature biofilms exhibited extensive surface coverage on all surfaces, which was visibly reduced following sanitizer application. This study provides insightful information to the produce industry for using sanitizing approaches on various surfaces based on cleanability, topographical, and architectural characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formation and Control of Listeria monocytogenes Growth and Accumulation on Food Processing Surfaces in the Fresh Produce Industry.\",\"authors\":\"Aysu Deniz, Blanca Ruiz-Llacsahuanga, Faith Critzer, Dan L Boyle, Josefina Lacasa, Umut Yucel, Valentina Trinetta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ability of L. monocytogenes, a common foodborne pathogen, to form biofilms significantly contributes to its persistence and contamination risks. Understanding L. monocytogenes aggregation is crucial to develop effective control strategies. This study assessed the growth and accumulation of L. monocytogenes on common food processing surfaces in the produce industry and evaluated the efficacy of commercially available sanitizers alone or simultaneously with UV-C light for 30 s, 1 min, or 5 min. L. monocytogenes was allowed to aggregate on stainless steel, nylon, high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and Teflon for 24 h (initial biofilm aggregate) and 96 h (mature biofilms). Treatments included 120 ppm peracetic acid (PAA), silver dihydrogen citrate (SDC), 4% lactic acid, and UV-C light (254 nm). After sanitizer application, cells were dislodged and enumerated by serial dilution and plating. Confocal images were obtained before and after treatments to evaluate biofilm architecture. All liquid sanitizers significantly reduced L. monocytogenes independently of the surface type (P < 0.05). UV-C treatment application time had no significant effect on biofilm reduction (P > 0.05), though its efficacy on 24 h aggregates varied significantly depending on the surface material. Peracetic acid and lactic acid were the most effective treatments across surfaces, while UV-C alone was the least effective. Combined sanitizer and UV-C light application for up to 5 min did not necessarily improve treatment efficacy compared to sanitizers alone. Confocal images displayed surface cleanability and alterations in microbial architecture before and after treatments. Mature biofilms exhibited extensive surface coverage on all surfaces, which was visibly reduced following sanitizer application. This study provides insightful information to the produce industry for using sanitizing approaches on various surfaces based on cleanability, topographical, and architectural characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100619\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单核细胞增生李斯特菌是一种常见的食源性病原体,其形成生物膜的能力大大增加了其持久性和污染风险。了解单核增生乳杆菌的聚集是制定有效控制策略的关键。本研究评估了生产工业中常见食品加工表面上单核细胞增生乳杆菌的生长和积累,并评估了市售消毒剂单独使用或同时使用UV-C照射30秒、1或5分钟的效果。单核增生乳杆菌在不锈钢、尼龙、高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)、聚氯乙烯(PVC)和聚四氟乙烯上聚集24 h(初始生物膜聚集)和96 h(成熟生物膜)。处理包括120 ppm的过氧乙酸(PAA),柠檬酸二氢银(SDC), 4%乳酸和UV-C光(254 nm)。使用杀菌剂后,通过连续稀释和电镀将细胞移出并计数。治疗前后获得共聚焦图像,评价生物膜结构。不同表面类型的液体消毒剂均显著降低了单核细胞增生乳杆菌(P < 0.05)。UV-C处理应用时间对生物膜还原无显著影响(P < 0.05),但对24 h聚集体的影响因表面材料的不同而有显著差异。过氧乙酸和乳酸是最有效的表面处理,而UV-C单独是最无效的。与单独使用消毒剂相比,联合使用消毒剂和UV-C灯长达5分钟不一定能提高治疗效果。共聚焦图像显示了处理前后的表面清洁度和微生物结构的变化。成熟的生物膜在所有表面上都表现出广泛的表面覆盖,在使用消毒剂后明显减少。这项研究为农产品行业提供了有见地的信息,可以根据可清洁性、地形和建筑特征对各种表面使用消毒方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formation and Control of Listeria monocytogenes Growth and Accumulation on Food Processing Surfaces in the Fresh Produce Industry.

The ability of L. monocytogenes, a common foodborne pathogen, to form biofilms significantly contributes to its persistence and contamination risks. Understanding L. monocytogenes aggregation is crucial to develop effective control strategies. This study assessed the growth and accumulation of L. monocytogenes on common food processing surfaces in the produce industry and evaluated the efficacy of commercially available sanitizers alone or simultaneously with UV-C light for 30 s, 1 min, or 5 min. L. monocytogenes was allowed to aggregate on stainless steel, nylon, high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and Teflon for 24 h (initial biofilm aggregate) and 96 h (mature biofilms). Treatments included 120 ppm peracetic acid (PAA), silver dihydrogen citrate (SDC), 4% lactic acid, and UV-C light (254 nm). After sanitizer application, cells were dislodged and enumerated by serial dilution and plating. Confocal images were obtained before and after treatments to evaluate biofilm architecture. All liquid sanitizers significantly reduced L. monocytogenes independently of the surface type (P < 0.05). UV-C treatment application time had no significant effect on biofilm reduction (P > 0.05), though its efficacy on 24 h aggregates varied significantly depending on the surface material. Peracetic acid and lactic acid were the most effective treatments across surfaces, while UV-C alone was the least effective. Combined sanitizer and UV-C light application for up to 5 min did not necessarily improve treatment efficacy compared to sanitizers alone. Confocal images displayed surface cleanability and alterations in microbial architecture before and after treatments. Mature biofilms exhibited extensive surface coverage on all surfaces, which was visibly reduced following sanitizer application. This study provides insightful information to the produce industry for using sanitizing approaches on various surfaces based on cleanability, topographical, and architectural characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信