Aysu Deniz, Blanca Ruiz-Llacsahuanga, Faith Critzer, Dan L Boyle, Josefina Lacasa, Umut Yucel, Valentina Trinetta
{"title":"生鲜食品加工表面单核增生李斯特菌的形成与控制。","authors":"Aysu Deniz, Blanca Ruiz-Llacsahuanga, Faith Critzer, Dan L Boyle, Josefina Lacasa, Umut Yucel, Valentina Trinetta","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability of L. monocytogenes, a common foodborne pathogen, to form biofilms significantly contributes to its persistence and contamination risks. Understanding L. monocytogenes aggregation is crucial to develop effective control strategies. This study assessed the growth and accumulation of L. monocytogenes on common food processing surfaces in the produce industry and evaluated the efficacy of commercially available sanitizers alone or simultaneously with UV-C light for 30 s, 1 min, or 5 min. L. monocytogenes was allowed to aggregate on stainless steel, nylon, high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and Teflon for 24 h (initial biofilm aggregate) and 96 h (mature biofilms). Treatments included 120 ppm peracetic acid (PAA), silver dihydrogen citrate (SDC), 4% lactic acid, and UV-C light (254 nm). After sanitizer application, cells were dislodged and enumerated by serial dilution and plating. Confocal images were obtained before and after treatments to evaluate biofilm architecture. All liquid sanitizers significantly reduced L. monocytogenes independently of the surface type (P < 0.05). UV-C treatment application time had no significant effect on biofilm reduction (P > 0.05), though its efficacy on 24 h aggregates varied significantly depending on the surface material. Peracetic acid and lactic acid were the most effective treatments across surfaces, while UV-C alone was the least effective. Combined sanitizer and UV-C light application for up to 5 min did not necessarily improve treatment efficacy compared to sanitizers alone. Confocal images displayed surface cleanability and alterations in microbial architecture before and after treatments. Mature biofilms exhibited extensive surface coverage on all surfaces, which was visibly reduced following sanitizer application. This study provides insightful information to the produce industry for using sanitizing approaches on various surfaces based on cleanability, topographical, and architectural characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formation and Control of Listeria monocytogenes Growth and Accumulation on Food Processing Surfaces in the Fresh Produce Industry.\",\"authors\":\"Aysu Deniz, Blanca Ruiz-Llacsahuanga, Faith Critzer, Dan L Boyle, Josefina Lacasa, Umut Yucel, Valentina Trinetta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ability of L. monocytogenes, a common foodborne pathogen, to form biofilms significantly contributes to its persistence and contamination risks. Understanding L. monocytogenes aggregation is crucial to develop effective control strategies. This study assessed the growth and accumulation of L. monocytogenes on common food processing surfaces in the produce industry and evaluated the efficacy of commercially available sanitizers alone or simultaneously with UV-C light for 30 s, 1 min, or 5 min. L. monocytogenes was allowed to aggregate on stainless steel, nylon, high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and Teflon for 24 h (initial biofilm aggregate) and 96 h (mature biofilms). Treatments included 120 ppm peracetic acid (PAA), silver dihydrogen citrate (SDC), 4% lactic acid, and UV-C light (254 nm). After sanitizer application, cells were dislodged and enumerated by serial dilution and plating. Confocal images were obtained before and after treatments to evaluate biofilm architecture. All liquid sanitizers significantly reduced L. monocytogenes independently of the surface type (P < 0.05). UV-C treatment application time had no significant effect on biofilm reduction (P > 0.05), though its efficacy on 24 h aggregates varied significantly depending on the surface material. Peracetic acid and lactic acid were the most effective treatments across surfaces, while UV-C alone was the least effective. Combined sanitizer and UV-C light application for up to 5 min did not necessarily improve treatment efficacy compared to sanitizers alone. Confocal images displayed surface cleanability and alterations in microbial architecture before and after treatments. Mature biofilms exhibited extensive surface coverage on all surfaces, which was visibly reduced following sanitizer application. This study provides insightful information to the produce industry for using sanitizing approaches on various surfaces based on cleanability, topographical, and architectural characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100619\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Formation and Control of Listeria monocytogenes Growth and Accumulation on Food Processing Surfaces in the Fresh Produce Industry.
The ability of L. monocytogenes, a common foodborne pathogen, to form biofilms significantly contributes to its persistence and contamination risks. Understanding L. monocytogenes aggregation is crucial to develop effective control strategies. This study assessed the growth and accumulation of L. monocytogenes on common food processing surfaces in the produce industry and evaluated the efficacy of commercially available sanitizers alone or simultaneously with UV-C light for 30 s, 1 min, or 5 min. L. monocytogenes was allowed to aggregate on stainless steel, nylon, high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and Teflon for 24 h (initial biofilm aggregate) and 96 h (mature biofilms). Treatments included 120 ppm peracetic acid (PAA), silver dihydrogen citrate (SDC), 4% lactic acid, and UV-C light (254 nm). After sanitizer application, cells were dislodged and enumerated by serial dilution and plating. Confocal images were obtained before and after treatments to evaluate biofilm architecture. All liquid sanitizers significantly reduced L. monocytogenes independently of the surface type (P < 0.05). UV-C treatment application time had no significant effect on biofilm reduction (P > 0.05), though its efficacy on 24 h aggregates varied significantly depending on the surface material. Peracetic acid and lactic acid were the most effective treatments across surfaces, while UV-C alone was the least effective. Combined sanitizer and UV-C light application for up to 5 min did not necessarily improve treatment efficacy compared to sanitizers alone. Confocal images displayed surface cleanability and alterations in microbial architecture before and after treatments. Mature biofilms exhibited extensive surface coverage on all surfaces, which was visibly reduced following sanitizer application. This study provides insightful information to the produce industry for using sanitizing approaches on various surfaces based on cleanability, topographical, and architectural characteristics.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.