Geneviève Picard, Tisha Prakash, France Labrèche, Sabrina Gravel
{"title":"牙科化学物质的职业暴露:范围综述。","authors":"Geneviève Picard, Tisha Prakash, France Labrèche, Sabrina Gravel","doi":"10.1080/15459624.2025.2540834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dental workforce comprises a variety of professions, most of which are predominantly occupied by women. Dental workers can be exposed to numerous toxic chemicals such as mercury, methacrylate polymers, and silica. This scoping review aims to synthesize the scientific literature on quantified chemical exposures and to identify research gaps in occupational chemical hazards faced by dental professionals. This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute approach and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, using three concepts to search PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science: workers, dental care, and chemicals. Studies from high-income countries, published in French or English between 2000 and 2024 and reporting direct quantitative exposure data, were included. A descriptive analysis presents exposures measured in urine, blood, and air samples for the most assessed chemicals. Thirty articles were included in the review, with two-thirds focused on exposures of dentists and none of denturists. Exposure assessments most often focused on mercury (<i>n</i> = 17 studies), followed by nitrous oxide (<i>n</i> = 6), methacrylate compounds (<i>n</i> = 4), and silica (<i>n</i> = 3). Most studies showed exposure levels below occupational exposure standards; however, certain aerosol-releasing tasks could exceed recommended occupational exposure limits of 0.025 mg/m³ for mercury and silica. Dental students in a simulation laboratory were exposed to a 4-hr mercury vapor level up to 3 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, and dentists' exposure in clinics reached 0.45 mg/m³. Silica concentrations were below occupational exposure limits in dental clinics but reached twice the standard in a dental laboratory during prosthodontics polishing activities. The review emphasizes the need for comprehensive exposure assessments among dental workers and highlights the lack of focus on denturists, dental technicians, and dental assistants. To adequately assess the overlooked risks posed by multi-exposures to chemicals among dental workers, future studies need to analyze and report on exposures and risks stratified by occupation, task, and sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":16599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational exposures to chemicals in dentistry: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Geneviève Picard, Tisha Prakash, France Labrèche, Sabrina Gravel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15459624.2025.2540834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The dental workforce comprises a variety of professions, most of which are predominantly occupied by women. Dental workers can be exposed to numerous toxic chemicals such as mercury, methacrylate polymers, and silica. This scoping review aims to synthesize the scientific literature on quantified chemical exposures and to identify research gaps in occupational chemical hazards faced by dental professionals. This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute approach and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, using three concepts to search PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science: workers, dental care, and chemicals. Studies from high-income countries, published in French or English between 2000 and 2024 and reporting direct quantitative exposure data, were included. A descriptive analysis presents exposures measured in urine, blood, and air samples for the most assessed chemicals. Thirty articles were included in the review, with two-thirds focused on exposures of dentists and none of denturists. Exposure assessments most often focused on mercury (<i>n</i> = 17 studies), followed by nitrous oxide (<i>n</i> = 6), methacrylate compounds (<i>n</i> = 4), and silica (<i>n</i> = 3). Most studies showed exposure levels below occupational exposure standards; however, certain aerosol-releasing tasks could exceed recommended occupational exposure limits of 0.025 mg/m³ for mercury and silica. Dental students in a simulation laboratory were exposed to a 4-hr mercury vapor level up to 3 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, and dentists' exposure in clinics reached 0.45 mg/m³. Silica concentrations were below occupational exposure limits in dental clinics but reached twice the standard in a dental laboratory during prosthodontics polishing activities. The review emphasizes the need for comprehensive exposure assessments among dental workers and highlights the lack of focus on denturists, dental technicians, and dental assistants. To adequately assess the overlooked risks posed by multi-exposures to chemicals among dental workers, future studies need to analyze and report on exposures and risks stratified by occupation, task, and sex.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2540834\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2540834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
牙科工作人员包括各种职业,其中大多数主要由妇女占据。牙科工作者可能会接触到许多有毒化学物质,如汞、甲基丙烯酸酯聚合物和二氧化硅。本综述旨在综合量化化学暴露的科学文献,并确定牙科专业人员面临的职业化学危害的研究空白。本综述遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法和PRISMA-ScR指南,使用三个概念来搜索PubMed, Embase和Web of Science:工人,牙科保健和化学品。研究纳入了2000年至2024年间以法语或英语发表并报告直接定量暴露数据的高收入国家的研究。一项描述性分析显示了在尿液、血液和空气样本中测量的暴露程度,其中评估的化学物质最多。30篇文章被纳入综述,其中三分之二的文章关注的是牙医的暴露,而不是牙科医生。暴露评估最常集中于汞(17项研究),其次是氧化亚氮(6项)、甲基丙烯酸酯化合物(4项)和二氧化硅(3项)。大多数研究显示暴露水平低于职业暴露标准;然而,某些气溶胶释放任务可能超过建议的汞和二氧化硅0.025 mg/m³的职业接触限值。牙科学生在模拟实验室中暴露在高达3 mg/m3的汞蒸气中4小时,牙医在诊所中的暴露量达到0.45 mg/m³。牙科诊所的二氧化硅浓度低于职业暴露限值,但在牙科实验室进行修复抛光时,二氧化硅浓度达到了标准的两倍。该综述强调需要对牙科工作者进行全面的暴露评估,并强调缺乏对牙科医生、牙科技师和牙科助理的关注。为了充分评估牙科工作者多次接触化学品所造成的被忽视的风险,未来的研究需要分析和报告按职业、任务和性别分层的接触和风险。
Occupational exposures to chemicals in dentistry: A scoping review.
The dental workforce comprises a variety of professions, most of which are predominantly occupied by women. Dental workers can be exposed to numerous toxic chemicals such as mercury, methacrylate polymers, and silica. This scoping review aims to synthesize the scientific literature on quantified chemical exposures and to identify research gaps in occupational chemical hazards faced by dental professionals. This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute approach and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, using three concepts to search PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science: workers, dental care, and chemicals. Studies from high-income countries, published in French or English between 2000 and 2024 and reporting direct quantitative exposure data, were included. A descriptive analysis presents exposures measured in urine, blood, and air samples for the most assessed chemicals. Thirty articles were included in the review, with two-thirds focused on exposures of dentists and none of denturists. Exposure assessments most often focused on mercury (n = 17 studies), followed by nitrous oxide (n = 6), methacrylate compounds (n = 4), and silica (n = 3). Most studies showed exposure levels below occupational exposure standards; however, certain aerosol-releasing tasks could exceed recommended occupational exposure limits of 0.025 mg/m³ for mercury and silica. Dental students in a simulation laboratory were exposed to a 4-hr mercury vapor level up to 3 mg/m3, and dentists' exposure in clinics reached 0.45 mg/m³. Silica concentrations were below occupational exposure limits in dental clinics but reached twice the standard in a dental laboratory during prosthodontics polishing activities. The review emphasizes the need for comprehensive exposure assessments among dental workers and highlights the lack of focus on denturists, dental technicians, and dental assistants. To adequately assess the overlooked risks posed by multi-exposures to chemicals among dental workers, future studies need to analyze and report on exposures and risks stratified by occupation, task, and sex.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene ( JOEH ) is a joint publication of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA®) and ACGIH®. The JOEH is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to enhancing the knowledge and practice of occupational and environmental hygiene and safety by widely disseminating research articles and applied studies of the highest quality.
The JOEH provides a written medium for the communication of ideas, methods, processes, and research in core and emerging areas of occupational and environmental hygiene. Core domains include, but are not limited to: exposure assessment, control strategies, ergonomics, and risk analysis. Emerging domains include, but are not limited to: sensor technology, emergency preparedness and response, changing workforce, and management and analysis of "big" data.