Thomas Rudolf Schneider, Ansgar Felbecker, Ben von Mitzlaff, Gregor Weissofner, Sarah Meier, Patrick Eggenberger, Simon Annaheim
{"title":"手灵巧度和机动性独立预测老年人的认知:一个多域回归分析。","authors":"Thomas Rudolf Schneider, Ansgar Felbecker, Ben von Mitzlaff, Gregor Weissofner, Sarah Meier, Patrick Eggenberger, Simon Annaheim","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2025.1624307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motor function is a sensitive indicator of cognitive aging but the unique contributions of different motor domains are unclear when assessed together.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 98 community-dwelling older adults (median age: 74). From a neuropsychological battery, a primary Global Cognitive Composite score (GCCS) and three secondary domain scores were derived using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Motor predictors included the Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT), grip strength, Apraxia Screen of TULIA (AST), SPPB sub-tests (5-chair-rises time (5CRT), 4 m-walk time (4MWT), balance), and inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gait parameters. Stepwise regression controlling for age and sex identified robust predictors of the GCCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final model identified several significant, independent motor predictors of the GCCS. Poorer hand dexterity (NHPT; <i>β</i> = -0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.01), slower 5CRT (<i>β</i> = -0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and slower 4MWT (<i>β</i> = -0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.03) were associated with worse cognitive performance, while greater minimum toe clearance was associated with better performance (<i>β</i> = 0.19, <i>p</i> = 0.01). In contrast, grip strength, balance, usual gait speed, and measures of gait variability were not retained. The model explained 50.3% of the variance (Adjusted R<sup>2</sup>) in global cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hand dexterity (NHPT) and specific functional mobility tasks (5CRT, 4MWT) are robust, independent predictors of cognition in older adults. Grip strength, balance, usual gait speed, and gait variability offer limited additional value when assessed together. The NHPT and timed SPPB components are accessible, pragmatic tools for motor-cognitive research and screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"17 ","pages":"1624307"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hand dexterity and mobility independently predict cognition in older adults: a multi-domain regression analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Rudolf Schneider, Ansgar Felbecker, Ben von Mitzlaff, Gregor Weissofner, Sarah Meier, Patrick Eggenberger, Simon Annaheim\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnagi.2025.1624307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motor function is a sensitive indicator of cognitive aging but the unique contributions of different motor domains are unclear when assessed together.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 98 community-dwelling older adults (median age: 74). From a neuropsychological battery, a primary Global Cognitive Composite score (GCCS) and three secondary domain scores were derived using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Motor predictors included the Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT), grip strength, Apraxia Screen of TULIA (AST), SPPB sub-tests (5-chair-rises time (5CRT), 4 m-walk time (4MWT), balance), and inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gait parameters. Stepwise regression controlling for age and sex identified robust predictors of the GCCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final model identified several significant, independent motor predictors of the GCCS. Poorer hand dexterity (NHPT; <i>β</i> = -0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.01), slower 5CRT (<i>β</i> = -0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and slower 4MWT (<i>β</i> = -0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.03) were associated with worse cognitive performance, while greater minimum toe clearance was associated with better performance (<i>β</i> = 0.19, <i>p</i> = 0.01). In contrast, grip strength, balance, usual gait speed, and measures of gait variability were not retained. The model explained 50.3% of the variance (Adjusted R<sup>2</sup>) in global cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hand dexterity (NHPT) and specific functional mobility tasks (5CRT, 4MWT) are robust, independent predictors of cognition in older adults. Grip strength, balance, usual gait speed, and gait variability offer limited additional value when assessed together. The NHPT and timed SPPB components are accessible, pragmatic tools for motor-cognitive research and screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1624307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417501/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1624307\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1624307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hand dexterity and mobility independently predict cognition in older adults: a multi-domain regression analysis.
Background: Motor function is a sensitive indicator of cognitive aging but the unique contributions of different motor domains are unclear when assessed together.
Methods: We evaluated 98 community-dwelling older adults (median age: 74). From a neuropsychological battery, a primary Global Cognitive Composite score (GCCS) and three secondary domain scores were derived using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Motor predictors included the Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT), grip strength, Apraxia Screen of TULIA (AST), SPPB sub-tests (5-chair-rises time (5CRT), 4 m-walk time (4MWT), balance), and inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gait parameters. Stepwise regression controlling for age and sex identified robust predictors of the GCCS.
Results: The final model identified several significant, independent motor predictors of the GCCS. Poorer hand dexterity (NHPT; β = -0.29, p < 0.01), slower 5CRT (β = -0.28, p < 0.01), and slower 4MWT (β = -0.17, p = 0.03) were associated with worse cognitive performance, while greater minimum toe clearance was associated with better performance (β = 0.19, p = 0.01). In contrast, grip strength, balance, usual gait speed, and measures of gait variability were not retained. The model explained 50.3% of the variance (Adjusted R2) in global cognitive performance.
Conclusion: Hand dexterity (NHPT) and specific functional mobility tasks (5CRT, 4MWT) are robust, independent predictors of cognition in older adults. Grip strength, balance, usual gait speed, and gait variability offer limited additional value when assessed together. The NHPT and timed SPPB components are accessible, pragmatic tools for motor-cognitive research and screening.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.