有先兆和无先兆偏头痛的脑成像:异同。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-12 DOI:10.1177/03331024251365807
Francesco Casillo, Gabriele Sebastianelli, Chiara Abagnale, Antonio Di Renzo, Lucia Ziccardi, Vincenzo Parisi, Gianluca Coppola
{"title":"有先兆和无先兆偏头痛的脑成像:异同。","authors":"Francesco Casillo, Gabriele Sebastianelli, Chiara Abagnale, Antonio Di Renzo, Lucia Ziccardi, Vincenzo Parisi, Gianluca Coppola","doi":"10.1177/03331024251365807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWhether migraine with aura (MA) is a biologically independent entity from migraine without aura (MO) is still debated. Similarities and differences between MO and MA have been extensively investigated in recent years through several neuroimaging studies, providing valuable insights into their underlying pathophysiology. To provide a better understanding of functional and structural differences between MO and MA, we conducted a narrative review of neuroimaging studies in these two conditions.MethodsA comprehensive PubMed search for neuroimaging studies in MO and MA was conducted in May 2025. We included studies that directly compared the two conditions using diffusion tensor imaging, voxel-based morphometry, surface-based morphometry, functional MRI and arterial spin labeling studies. No publication date restrictions were applied.ResultsOverall, patients with MA exhibited heightened engagement of the visual regions, cerebellum and thalamus. However, both MO and MA shared common activation of parts of the salience network and involvement of similar visual areas, including the striate and extrastriate cortices. However, contrasting results and several inconsistencies emerged from the analysis of different imaging studies. These included the lack of specification regarding the phase of the migraine cycle during which the scans were conducted, the inclusion of patients under migraine prevention, small sample sizes, and different approaches to data and statistical analysis (including a more liberal approach to interpreting results).ConclusionsAlthough several biases influence the reliability of most findings, patients with MA exhibited higher involvement of visual processing regions, decreased cerebellar antinociceptive activity and impaired thalamic information filtering. Whether this pattern represents the consequence of the recurrence of cortical spreading depression or a primary predisposition to it remains to be determined. Future studies with a rigorous and standardized approach are needed to understand the differences between MO and MA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 9","pages":"3331024251365807"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain imaging in migraine with and without aura: Similarities and differences.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Casillo, Gabriele Sebastianelli, Chiara Abagnale, Antonio Di Renzo, Lucia Ziccardi, Vincenzo Parisi, Gianluca Coppola\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03331024251365807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundWhether migraine with aura (MA) is a biologically independent entity from migraine without aura (MO) is still debated. Similarities and differences between MO and MA have been extensively investigated in recent years through several neuroimaging studies, providing valuable insights into their underlying pathophysiology. To provide a better understanding of functional and structural differences between MO and MA, we conducted a narrative review of neuroimaging studies in these two conditions.MethodsA comprehensive PubMed search for neuroimaging studies in MO and MA was conducted in May 2025. We included studies that directly compared the two conditions using diffusion tensor imaging, voxel-based morphometry, surface-based morphometry, functional MRI and arterial spin labeling studies. No publication date restrictions were applied.ResultsOverall, patients with MA exhibited heightened engagement of the visual regions, cerebellum and thalamus. However, both MO and MA shared common activation of parts of the salience network and involvement of similar visual areas, including the striate and extrastriate cortices. However, contrasting results and several inconsistencies emerged from the analysis of different imaging studies. These included the lack of specification regarding the phase of the migraine cycle during which the scans were conducted, the inclusion of patients under migraine prevention, small sample sizes, and different approaches to data and statistical analysis (including a more liberal approach to interpreting results).ConclusionsAlthough several biases influence the reliability of most findings, patients with MA exhibited higher involvement of visual processing regions, decreased cerebellar antinociceptive activity and impaired thalamic information filtering. Whether this pattern represents the consequence of the recurrence of cortical spreading depression or a primary predisposition to it remains to be determined. Future studies with a rigorous and standardized approach are needed to understand the differences between MO and MA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"volume\":\"45 9\",\"pages\":\"3331024251365807\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251365807\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251365807","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先兆偏头痛(MA)与无先兆偏头痛(MO)在生物学上是否独立存在争议。近年来,通过一些神经影像学研究广泛研究了MO和MA之间的异同,为其潜在的病理生理学提供了有价值的见解。为了更好地了解MO和MA之间的功能和结构差异,我们对这两种情况的神经影像学研究进行了叙述性回顾。方法于2025年5月在PubMed上对MO和MA的神经影像学研究进行综合检索。我们纳入了使用扩散张量成像、基于体素的形态测量、基于表面的形态测量、功能性MRI和动脉自旋标记研究直接比较两种情况的研究。没有出版日期限制。结果总体而言,MA患者表现出视觉区、小脑和丘脑的高度参与。然而,MO和MA都有共同的突出网络部分激活,并涉及类似的视觉区域,包括纹状皮层和外皮层。然而,对比结果和一些不一致的地方出现在不同的影像学研究分析中。这些问题包括:扫描期间偏头痛周期的阶段缺乏规范,纳入偏头痛预防的患者,样本量小,数据和统计分析方法不同(包括解释结果的更自由的方法)。结论尽管存在一些偏差影响大多数结果的可靠性,但MA患者表现出更高的视觉加工区受损伤,小脑抗感觉活性下降,丘脑信息过滤功能受损。这种模式是否代表皮层扩张性凹陷复发的结果或其主要易感性仍有待确定。未来的研究需要采用严格和标准化的方法来了解MO和MA之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brain imaging in migraine with and without aura: Similarities and differences.

BackgroundWhether migraine with aura (MA) is a biologically independent entity from migraine without aura (MO) is still debated. Similarities and differences between MO and MA have been extensively investigated in recent years through several neuroimaging studies, providing valuable insights into their underlying pathophysiology. To provide a better understanding of functional and structural differences between MO and MA, we conducted a narrative review of neuroimaging studies in these two conditions.MethodsA comprehensive PubMed search for neuroimaging studies in MO and MA was conducted in May 2025. We included studies that directly compared the two conditions using diffusion tensor imaging, voxel-based morphometry, surface-based morphometry, functional MRI and arterial spin labeling studies. No publication date restrictions were applied.ResultsOverall, patients with MA exhibited heightened engagement of the visual regions, cerebellum and thalamus. However, both MO and MA shared common activation of parts of the salience network and involvement of similar visual areas, including the striate and extrastriate cortices. However, contrasting results and several inconsistencies emerged from the analysis of different imaging studies. These included the lack of specification regarding the phase of the migraine cycle during which the scans were conducted, the inclusion of patients under migraine prevention, small sample sizes, and different approaches to data and statistical analysis (including a more liberal approach to interpreting results).ConclusionsAlthough several biases influence the reliability of most findings, patients with MA exhibited higher involvement of visual processing regions, decreased cerebellar antinociceptive activity and impaired thalamic information filtering. Whether this pattern represents the consequence of the recurrence of cortical spreading depression or a primary predisposition to it remains to be determined. Future studies with a rigorous and standardized approach are needed to understand the differences between MO and MA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信