对模型知情的静脉注射利奈唑胺精确给药:危重成人药代动力学模型的多中心外部评估。

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Johannes Starp, Antonia Leonhardt, Michael Zoller, Christina Scharf, Johannes Zander, Michael Paal, Sebastian Greppmair, Lea M Schatz, Julian Ermtraud, Alexandra K Kunzelmann, Christina König, Jörn Grensemann, Lana Reiter, Cindy Lau, Deborah Marriott, Sophie L Stocker, Sebastian G Wicha, Uwe Liebchen
{"title":"对模型知情的静脉注射利奈唑胺精确给药:危重成人药代动力学模型的多中心外部评估。","authors":"Johannes Starp, Antonia Leonhardt, Michael Zoller, Christina Scharf, Johannes Zander, Michael Paal, Sebastian Greppmair, Lea M Schatz, Julian Ermtraud, Alexandra K Kunzelmann, Christina König, Jörn Grensemann, Lana Reiter, Cindy Lau, Deborah Marriott, Sophie L Stocker, Sebastian G Wicha, Uwe Liebchen","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Linezolid is a frequently utilised antibiotic to treat serious infections caused by resistant pathogens in critically ill patients. Using the currently recommended one-dose-fits-all strategy leads to insufficient target attainment. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD), an approach combining mathematical models and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), can improve target attainment. The underlying population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model must be selected carefully. The aim of this study was to determine which models are applicable for MIPD in critically ill patients treated with intravenous linezolid.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for intravenous linezolid administration was obtained from three sites and 166 patients (498 TDM samples). The predictive performance of 30 published popPK models was analysed in three scenarios: considering patients' covariates only (a priori, AP), and including one or two TDM samples (Bayesian forecasting, B1/B2). Metrics used for comparison were median relative prediction error (MDPE) [%], median absolute relative prediction error (MDAPE) [%], and the theoretical target attainment (TTA) [%] for trough concentrations of 2-8 mg/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluated models were highly heterogeneous in model structure and predictive performance. MDPE, MDAPE and TTA were improved by inclusion of TDM samples. MDPE ranged from -135.9% to 110.9% (AP), -21.1% to 69.7% (B1) and -15.6% to 54.6% (B2). Overall, the lowest MDAPE was demonstrated by the models of Boak, Fang, and Wu. Several models that resulted in similarly good results are also potentially useful for MIPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predictive performance varied substantially underlining the importance of model evaluation prior to MIPD implementation for linezolid. Using the aforementioned models promises target attainment rates up to 80% in critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards model-informed precision dosing of intravenous linezolid: a multicentre external evaluation of pharmacokinetic models in critically ill adults.\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Starp, Antonia Leonhardt, Michael Zoller, Christina Scharf, Johannes Zander, Michael Paal, Sebastian Greppmair, Lea M Schatz, Julian Ermtraud, Alexandra K Kunzelmann, Christina König, Jörn Grensemann, Lana Reiter, Cindy Lau, Deborah Marriott, Sophie L Stocker, Sebastian G Wicha, Uwe Liebchen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Linezolid is a frequently utilised antibiotic to treat serious infections caused by resistant pathogens in critically ill patients. Using the currently recommended one-dose-fits-all strategy leads to insufficient target attainment. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD), an approach combining mathematical models and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), can improve target attainment. The underlying population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model must be selected carefully. The aim of this study was to determine which models are applicable for MIPD in critically ill patients treated with intravenous linezolid.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for intravenous linezolid administration was obtained from three sites and 166 patients (498 TDM samples). The predictive performance of 30 published popPK models was analysed in three scenarios: considering patients' covariates only (a priori, AP), and including one or two TDM samples (Bayesian forecasting, B1/B2). Metrics used for comparison were median relative prediction error (MDPE) [%], median absolute relative prediction error (MDAPE) [%], and the theoretical target attainment (TTA) [%] for trough concentrations of 2-8 mg/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluated models were highly heterogeneous in model structure and predictive performance. MDPE, MDAPE and TTA were improved by inclusion of TDM samples. MDPE ranged from -135.9% to 110.9% (AP), -21.1% to 69.7% (B1) and -15.6% to 54.6% (B2). Overall, the lowest MDAPE was demonstrated by the models of Boak, Fang, and Wu. Several models that resulted in similarly good results are also potentially useful for MIPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predictive performance varied substantially underlining the importance of model evaluation prior to MIPD implementation for linezolid. Using the aforementioned models promises target attainment rates up to 80% in critically ill patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利奈唑胺是一种常用的抗生素,用于治疗危重患者由耐药病原体引起的严重感染。使用目前推荐的“一剂适用于所有人”战略导致无法充分实现目标。模型知情精确给药(MIPD)是一种将数学模型与治疗药物监测(TDM)相结合的方法,可以提高目标的实现。必须仔细选择潜在的群体药代动力学(popPK)模型。本研究的目的是确定哪些模型适用于静脉注射利奈唑胺治疗的危重患者的MIPD。方法:收集3个部位166例TDM患者(498例)静脉给药资料。在三种情况下分析了30个已发表的popPK模型的预测性能:仅考虑患者协变量(先验,AP),并包括一个或两个TDM样本(贝叶斯预测,B1/B2)。用于比较的指标为谷浓度为2-8 mg/L时的中位相对预测误差(MDPE)[%]、中位绝对相对预测误差(MDAPE)[%]和理论目标达到率(TTA)[%]。结果:评估的模型在模型结构和预测性能上具有高度异质性。加入TDM后,MDPE、MDAPE和TTA均得到改善。MDPE范围为-135.9%至110.9% (AP), -21.1%至69.7% (B1)和-15.6%至54.6% (B2)。总体而言,Boak、Fang和Wu的模型显示了最低的MDAPE。产生类似良好结果的几个模型也可能对MIPD有用。结论:预测性能差异很大,强调了在利奈唑胺实施MIPD之前模型评估的重要性。使用上述模型可以保证危重病人的目标达到率高达80%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards model-informed precision dosing of intravenous linezolid: a multicentre external evaluation of pharmacokinetic models in critically ill adults.

Objectives: Linezolid is a frequently utilised antibiotic to treat serious infections caused by resistant pathogens in critically ill patients. Using the currently recommended one-dose-fits-all strategy leads to insufficient target attainment. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD), an approach combining mathematical models and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), can improve target attainment. The underlying population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model must be selected carefully. The aim of this study was to determine which models are applicable for MIPD in critically ill patients treated with intravenous linezolid.

Methods: Data for intravenous linezolid administration was obtained from three sites and 166 patients (498 TDM samples). The predictive performance of 30 published popPK models was analysed in three scenarios: considering patients' covariates only (a priori, AP), and including one or two TDM samples (Bayesian forecasting, B1/B2). Metrics used for comparison were median relative prediction error (MDPE) [%], median absolute relative prediction error (MDAPE) [%], and the theoretical target attainment (TTA) [%] for trough concentrations of 2-8 mg/L.

Results: The evaluated models were highly heterogeneous in model structure and predictive performance. MDPE, MDAPE and TTA were improved by inclusion of TDM samples. MDPE ranged from -135.9% to 110.9% (AP), -21.1% to 69.7% (B1) and -15.6% to 54.6% (B2). Overall, the lowest MDAPE was demonstrated by the models of Boak, Fang, and Wu. Several models that resulted in similarly good results are also potentially useful for MIPD.

Conclusion: Predictive performance varied substantially underlining the importance of model evaluation prior to MIPD implementation for linezolid. Using the aforementioned models promises target attainment rates up to 80% in critically ill patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信