感染预防控制与医院效率和声誉的关联研究。

IF 2.4 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Archana Shahi, Renu Thakur
{"title":"感染预防控制与医院效率和声誉的关联研究。","authors":"Archana Shahi, Renu Thakur","doi":"10.1177/09727531251367815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) processes are associated with inherent changes in the general operations of hospitals as they directly modify the clinical outcomes, effective functioning and the internal image of any healthcare setting. Positive IPC is essential to the safety of patients and reliability of the institution. Insight into the perceptions of IPC practice by the hospital staff is a vital element to enhance practising procedures and optimise practice-related measures.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the perception and practicability of the IPC between the members of staff working in the hospital in different clinical and non-clinical departments. In particular, the study aimed at defining the impact of such practices on the efficiency and internal reputability of the hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was designed to be given to the members of staff at the hospital, a research of Linking Infection Prevention Control to Hospital Efficiency and Reputation in several departments, both clinical and non-clinical. The collected data involved staff perceptions about IPC practices, factors that impede proper implementation and infection high-risk areas. The answers were compared in a logical manner to discover a shared theme and possible missing links in the modern IPC strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Current IPC measures negatively influenced hospital efficiency and the internal reputation, as established by the analysis. Employees have pointed out the great variance in the practice levels of IPC compliance between the departments, and that intervention in this may be required to complement training with targeted solutions, especially where there is the greatest risk. The research reported that persistency in training and education enhanced compliance as well as awareness among the health workers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings support the need to make hospitals focus on high-risk processes and ensure implementation of IPC practices by reinforcing it with specific training sessions. Educational programs have the prospect to significantly increase efficiency and internal image of the hospital because they may influence staff members and their perspective on it. The need to study the most appropriate sample size and the contribution of cutting-edge technologies in enhancing IPC further should also be answered in subsequent research.</p>","PeriodicalId":7921,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"09727531251367815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Linking Infection Prevention Control to Hospital Efficiency and Reputation.\",\"authors\":\"Archana Shahi, Renu Thakur\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09727531251367815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) processes are associated with inherent changes in the general operations of hospitals as they directly modify the clinical outcomes, effective functioning and the internal image of any healthcare setting. Positive IPC is essential to the safety of patients and reliability of the institution. Insight into the perceptions of IPC practice by the hospital staff is a vital element to enhance practising procedures and optimise practice-related measures.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the perception and practicability of the IPC between the members of staff working in the hospital in different clinical and non-clinical departments. In particular, the study aimed at defining the impact of such practices on the efficiency and internal reputability of the hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was designed to be given to the members of staff at the hospital, a research of Linking Infection Prevention Control to Hospital Efficiency and Reputation in several departments, both clinical and non-clinical. The collected data involved staff perceptions about IPC practices, factors that impede proper implementation and infection high-risk areas. The answers were compared in a logical manner to discover a shared theme and possible missing links in the modern IPC strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Current IPC measures negatively influenced hospital efficiency and the internal reputation, as established by the analysis. Employees have pointed out the great variance in the practice levels of IPC compliance between the departments, and that intervention in this may be required to complement training with targeted solutions, especially where there is the greatest risk. The research reported that persistency in training and education enhanced compliance as well as awareness among the health workers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings support the need to make hospitals focus on high-risk processes and ensure implementation of IPC practices by reinforcing it with specific training sessions. Educational programs have the prospect to significantly increase efficiency and internal image of the hospital because they may influence staff members and their perspective on it. The need to study the most appropriate sample size and the contribution of cutting-edge technologies in enhancing IPC further should also be answered in subsequent research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"09727531251367815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417443/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531251367815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531251367815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:感染预防和控制(IPC)过程与医院一般操作的内在变化有关,因为它们直接改变任何医疗保健机构的临床结果、有效功能和内部形象。阳性IPC对患者的安全和医疗机构的可靠性至关重要。深入了解医院工作人员对IPC实践的看法是加强实践程序和优化实践相关措施的重要因素。目的:本研究的目的是评估医院不同临床和非临床科室工作人员对IPC的认知和实用性。特别是,这项研究旨在确定这种做法对医院的效率和内部声誉的影响。方法:采用问卷调查的方法,对该院临床及非临床科室感染预防控制与医院效率及声誉的关系进行调查。收集的数据涉及工作人员对IPC做法的看法、妨碍适当实施的因素和感染高危地区。以逻辑的方式对答案进行比较,以发现一个共同的主题和现代IPC策略中可能缺失的环节。结果:目前的IPC措施对医院效率和内部声誉产生了负面影响。员工们指出,各部门在IPC合规的实践水平上存在很大差异,可能需要对此进行干预,以有针对性的解决方案补充培训,特别是在存在最大风险的地方。研究报告说,坚持培训和教育提高了卫生工作者的遵守和认识。结论:调查结果表明,有必要让医院关注高风险流程,并通过加强具体培训课程来确保IPC实践的实施。教育项目具有显著提高医院效率和内部形象的前景,因为它们可能会影响员工及其对医院的看法。研究最适当的样本量和尖端技术在进一步加强IPC方面的贡献的需要也应在随后的研究中得到回答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study of Linking Infection Prevention Control to Hospital Efficiency and Reputation.

Background: Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) processes are associated with inherent changes in the general operations of hospitals as they directly modify the clinical outcomes, effective functioning and the internal image of any healthcare setting. Positive IPC is essential to the safety of patients and reliability of the institution. Insight into the perceptions of IPC practice by the hospital staff is a vital element to enhance practising procedures and optimise practice-related measures.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the perception and practicability of the IPC between the members of staff working in the hospital in different clinical and non-clinical departments. In particular, the study aimed at defining the impact of such practices on the efficiency and internal reputability of the hospital.

Methods: A questionnaire was designed to be given to the members of staff at the hospital, a research of Linking Infection Prevention Control to Hospital Efficiency and Reputation in several departments, both clinical and non-clinical. The collected data involved staff perceptions about IPC practices, factors that impede proper implementation and infection high-risk areas. The answers were compared in a logical manner to discover a shared theme and possible missing links in the modern IPC strategies.

Results: Current IPC measures negatively influenced hospital efficiency and the internal reputation, as established by the analysis. Employees have pointed out the great variance in the practice levels of IPC compliance between the departments, and that intervention in this may be required to complement training with targeted solutions, especially where there is the greatest risk. The research reported that persistency in training and education enhanced compliance as well as awareness among the health workers.

Conclusion: Findings support the need to make hospitals focus on high-risk processes and ensure implementation of IPC practices by reinforcing it with specific training sessions. Educational programs have the prospect to significantly increase efficiency and internal image of the hospital because they may influence staff members and their perspective on it. The need to study the most appropriate sample size and the contribution of cutting-edge technologies in enhancing IPC further should also be answered in subsequent research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Neurosciences
Annals of Neurosciences NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信