作为探索动力的生物过程。

IF 3.1 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Jane Kondev, Marc Kirschner, Hernan G Garcia, Gabriel L Salmon, Rob Phillips
{"title":"作为探索动力的生物过程。","authors":"Jane Kondev, Marc Kirschner, Hernan G Garcia, Gabriel L Salmon, Rob Phillips","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many biological processes can be thought of as the result of an underlying dynamics in which the system repeatedly undergoes distinct and abortive trajectories with the dynamical process only ending when some specific process, purpose, structure, or function is achieved. A classic example is the way in which microtubules attach to kinetochores as a prerequisite for chromosome segregation and cell division. In this example, the dynamics is characterized by apparently futile time histories in which microtubules repeatedly grow and shrink without chromosomal attachment. We hypothesize that for biological processes for which it is not the initial conditions that matter, but rather the final state, this kind of exploratory dynamics is biology's unique and necessary solution to achieving these functions with high fidelity. This kind of cause-and-effect relationship can be contrasted to examples from physics and chemistry where the initial conditions determine the outcome. In this paper, we examine the similarities of many biological processes that depend upon random trajectories starting from the initial state and the selection of subsets of these trajectories to achieve some desired functional final state. We begin by reviewing the long history of the principles of dynamics, first in the context of physics, and then in the context of the study of life. These ideas are then stacked up against the broad categories of biological phenomenology that exhibit exploratory dynamics. We then build on earlier work by making a quantitative examination of a succession of increasingly sophisticated models for exploratory dynamics, all of which share the common feature of being a series of repeated trials that ultimately end in a \"winning\" trajectory. We also explore the ways in which microscopic parameters can be tuned to alter exploratory dynamics as well as the energetic burden of performing such processes. It is a great privilege to take part in this special volume dedicated to the life and work of Prof. Erich Sackmann (1934-2024). For one of us (R.P.), at the time of making a switch from traditional condensed matter physics to a life engaged in the study of life, he went to a meeting near Munich that completely opened his eyes to the ways in which the approach of physics could be brought to bear on the study of the living. Sackmann's work was an inspiring presence at that meeting. One of the hallmarks of his work was a principled approach to dissecting biological processes over a range of scales and phenomena. One common thread to much of his work was that it acknowledged the dynamical character of living organisms. The present paper attempts to follow in the tradition of Sackmann's studies of dynamics by suggesting a new way of looking at many biological processes all through the unifying perspective of what we will call exploratory dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biological processes as exploratory dynamics.\",\"authors\":\"Jane Kondev, Marc Kirschner, Hernan G Garcia, Gabriel L Salmon, Rob Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many biological processes can be thought of as the result of an underlying dynamics in which the system repeatedly undergoes distinct and abortive trajectories with the dynamical process only ending when some specific process, purpose, structure, or function is achieved. A classic example is the way in which microtubules attach to kinetochores as a prerequisite for chromosome segregation and cell division. In this example, the dynamics is characterized by apparently futile time histories in which microtubules repeatedly grow and shrink without chromosomal attachment. We hypothesize that for biological processes for which it is not the initial conditions that matter, but rather the final state, this kind of exploratory dynamics is biology's unique and necessary solution to achieving these functions with high fidelity. This kind of cause-and-effect relationship can be contrasted to examples from physics and chemistry where the initial conditions determine the outcome. In this paper, we examine the similarities of many biological processes that depend upon random trajectories starting from the initial state and the selection of subsets of these trajectories to achieve some desired functional final state. We begin by reviewing the long history of the principles of dynamics, first in the context of physics, and then in the context of the study of life. These ideas are then stacked up against the broad categories of biological phenomenology that exhibit exploratory dynamics. We then build on earlier work by making a quantitative examination of a succession of increasingly sophisticated models for exploratory dynamics, all of which share the common feature of being a series of repeated trials that ultimately end in a \\\"winning\\\" trajectory. We also explore the ways in which microscopic parameters can be tuned to alter exploratory dynamics as well as the energetic burden of performing such processes. It is a great privilege to take part in this special volume dedicated to the life and work of Prof. Erich Sackmann (1934-2024). For one of us (R.P.), at the time of making a switch from traditional condensed matter physics to a life engaged in the study of life, he went to a meeting near Munich that completely opened his eyes to the ways in which the approach of physics could be brought to bear on the study of the living. Sackmann's work was an inspiring presence at that meeting. One of the hallmarks of his work was a principled approach to dissecting biological processes over a range of scales and phenomena. One common thread to much of his work was that it acknowledged the dynamical character of living organisms. The present paper attempts to follow in the tradition of Sackmann's studies of dynamics by suggesting a new way of looking at many biological processes all through the unifying perspective of what we will call exploratory dynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.09.009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.09.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多生物过程可以被认为是一种潜在动力学的结果,在这种动力学中,系统反复经历不同的和失败的轨迹,只有在某些特定的过程、目的、结构或功能实现时,动力学过程才会结束。一个典型的例子是微管附着在着丝点上,作为染色体分离和细胞分裂的先决条件。在这个例子中,动力学的特点是微管在没有染色体附着的情况下反复生长和收缩,这显然是徒劳的时间历史。我们假设,对于重要的不是初始条件,而是最终状态的生物过程,这种探索动态是生物学以高保真度实现这些功能的独特而必要的解决方案。这种因果关系可以与物理和化学中的例子形成对比,在物理和化学中,初始条件决定结果。在本文中,我们研究了许多生物过程的相似性,这些过程依赖于从初始状态开始的随机轨迹和这些轨迹子集的选择来达到某些期望的功能最终状态。我们首先回顾动力学原理的悠久历史,首先在物理学的背景下,然后在生命研究的背景下。然后,这些想法与展示探索动态的生物现象学的广泛类别相比较。然后,我们在早期工作的基础上,对一系列越来越复杂的探索动力学模型进行定量检查,所有这些模型都具有一系列重复试验的共同特征,最终以“获胜”轨迹告终。我们还探讨了微观参数可以调整的方式,以改变探索动态以及执行这些过程的能量负担。这是一个巨大的荣幸参加这个特别卷致力于生活和工作的教授埃里希萨克曼(1934-2024)。我们中的一个人(RP),在从传统的凝聚态物理学转向从事生命研究的时候,他参加了慕尼黑附近的一个会议,这个会议完全打开了他的眼界,让他看到了物理学的方法可以用于研究生命。在那次会议上,萨克曼的工作令人鼓舞。他的工作的一个特点是一个原则性的方法来剖析生物过程在一系列尺度和现象。他的许多工作都有一个共同点,那就是承认生物体的动态特性。本文试图遵循萨克曼动力学研究的传统,提出一种新的方法,通过我们称之为探索性动力学的统一视角来看待许多生物过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biological processes as exploratory dynamics.

Many biological processes can be thought of as the result of an underlying dynamics in which the system repeatedly undergoes distinct and abortive trajectories with the dynamical process only ending when some specific process, purpose, structure, or function is achieved. A classic example is the way in which microtubules attach to kinetochores as a prerequisite for chromosome segregation and cell division. In this example, the dynamics is characterized by apparently futile time histories in which microtubules repeatedly grow and shrink without chromosomal attachment. We hypothesize that for biological processes for which it is not the initial conditions that matter, but rather the final state, this kind of exploratory dynamics is biology's unique and necessary solution to achieving these functions with high fidelity. This kind of cause-and-effect relationship can be contrasted to examples from physics and chemistry where the initial conditions determine the outcome. In this paper, we examine the similarities of many biological processes that depend upon random trajectories starting from the initial state and the selection of subsets of these trajectories to achieve some desired functional final state. We begin by reviewing the long history of the principles of dynamics, first in the context of physics, and then in the context of the study of life. These ideas are then stacked up against the broad categories of biological phenomenology that exhibit exploratory dynamics. We then build on earlier work by making a quantitative examination of a succession of increasingly sophisticated models for exploratory dynamics, all of which share the common feature of being a series of repeated trials that ultimately end in a "winning" trajectory. We also explore the ways in which microscopic parameters can be tuned to alter exploratory dynamics as well as the energetic burden of performing such processes. It is a great privilege to take part in this special volume dedicated to the life and work of Prof. Erich Sackmann (1934-2024). For one of us (R.P.), at the time of making a switch from traditional condensed matter physics to a life engaged in the study of life, he went to a meeting near Munich that completely opened his eyes to the ways in which the approach of physics could be brought to bear on the study of the living. Sackmann's work was an inspiring presence at that meeting. One of the hallmarks of his work was a principled approach to dissecting biological processes over a range of scales and phenomena. One common thread to much of his work was that it acknowledged the dynamical character of living organisms. The present paper attempts to follow in the tradition of Sackmann's studies of dynamics by suggesting a new way of looking at many biological processes all through the unifying perspective of what we will call exploratory dynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biophysical journal
Biophysical journal 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3090
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信