Shannon Fuller, Omeid Heidari, Karin Tobin, Julia Burlaka, Melissa Davey-Rothwell, Tetiana Kiriazova, Jill Owczarzak
{"title":"使用潜伏剖面分析,以确定耻辱类型的妇女感染艾滋病毒和谁注射毒品在乌克兰的样本。","authors":"Shannon Fuller, Omeid Heidari, Karin Tobin, Julia Burlaka, Melissa Davey-Rothwell, Tetiana Kiriazova, Jill Owczarzak","doi":"10.1007/s10461-025-04845-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women living with HIV (WLWH) who inject drugs experience intersecting forms of stigma that adversely impact care engagement and health outcomes. We used latent profile analysis to identify typologies of intersecting stigma among WLWH who inject drugs and examined individual, social, and health care-related factors associated with these typologies. Surveys were collected from WLWH in Ukraine (n = 297) between 2019 and 2020. Six scales for internalized and enacted stigma related to HIV and drug use were used, then multinomial logistic regression assessed factors associated with profile membership. Four profiles emerged: \"low stigma\" (reference group, estimated 32.3% of the sample), \"internalized stigma only\" (49.2%), \"social network stigma\" (12.1%), and \"provider stigma\" (6.4%). Some degree of internalized stigma for both HIV and drug use was present across all profiles, including the reference group. Drug use stigma scores were generally higher than those for HIV. After adjusting for age, income, and time since HIV diagnosis, participants engaged in HIV care had significantly lower odds of being in the \"provider stigma\" profile compared to the reference group (aOR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.86, p < 0.05), while a higher frequency of injection drug use had greater association with the \"provider stigma\" profile (aOR = 8.26, 95% CI: 1.55-44.16, p < 0.05). History of intimate partner violence was associated with the \"internalized stigma only\" (aOR = 3.21, 95% CI: 1.51-6.82, p < 0.01) and \"social network stigma\" (aOR = 3.42, 95% CI: 1.15-10.22, p < 0.05) profiles. These findings illustrate the value of latent profile analysis in understanding intersectional stigma and highlight the need for tailored interventions to address stigma among WLWH who inject drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Latent Profile Analysis to Identify Stigma Typologies Among a Sample of Women Living with HIV and Who Inject Drugs in Ukraine.\",\"authors\":\"Shannon Fuller, Omeid Heidari, Karin Tobin, Julia Burlaka, Melissa Davey-Rothwell, Tetiana Kiriazova, Jill Owczarzak\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10461-025-04845-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Women living with HIV (WLWH) who inject drugs experience intersecting forms of stigma that adversely impact care engagement and health outcomes. We used latent profile analysis to identify typologies of intersecting stigma among WLWH who inject drugs and examined individual, social, and health care-related factors associated with these typologies. Surveys were collected from WLWH in Ukraine (n = 297) between 2019 and 2020. Six scales for internalized and enacted stigma related to HIV and drug use were used, then multinomial logistic regression assessed factors associated with profile membership. Four profiles emerged: \\\"low stigma\\\" (reference group, estimated 32.3% of the sample), \\\"internalized stigma only\\\" (49.2%), \\\"social network stigma\\\" (12.1%), and \\\"provider stigma\\\" (6.4%). Some degree of internalized stigma for both HIV and drug use was present across all profiles, including the reference group. Drug use stigma scores were generally higher than those for HIV. After adjusting for age, income, and time since HIV diagnosis, participants engaged in HIV care had significantly lower odds of being in the \\\"provider stigma\\\" profile compared to the reference group (aOR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.86, p < 0.05), while a higher frequency of injection drug use had greater association with the \\\"provider stigma\\\" profile (aOR = 8.26, 95% CI: 1.55-44.16, p < 0.05). History of intimate partner violence was associated with the \\\"internalized stigma only\\\" (aOR = 3.21, 95% CI: 1.51-6.82, p < 0.01) and \\\"social network stigma\\\" (aOR = 3.42, 95% CI: 1.15-10.22, p < 0.05) profiles. These findings illustrate the value of latent profile analysis in understanding intersectional stigma and highlight the need for tailored interventions to address stigma among WLWH who inject drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS and Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04845-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04845-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
注射毒品的艾滋病毒感染妇女受到各种形式的污名,对护理参与和健康结果产生不利影响。我们使用潜在剖面分析来确定注射毒品的WLWH中交叉污名的类型,并检查与这些类型相关的个人、社会和卫生保健相关因素。调查是在2019年至2020年期间从乌克兰的WLWH收集的(n = 297)。本研究采用了与HIV和药物使用相关的内化和制定污名的六个量表,然后采用多项逻辑回归评估了与特征隶属度相关的因素。出现了四种情况:“低耻辱感”(参照组,约占样本的32.3%),“仅内化耻辱感”(49.2%),“社交网络耻辱感”(12.1%)和“提供者耻辱感”(6.4%)。在包括参照组在内的所有概况中,都存在某种程度的对艾滋病毒和药物使用的内化耻辱。吸毒污名得分普遍高于艾滋病毒感染者。在调整了年龄、收入和自HIV诊断以来的时间后,与参照组相比,参与HIV护理的参与者出现“提供者耻辱”的几率显著降低(aOR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.86, p
Using Latent Profile Analysis to Identify Stigma Typologies Among a Sample of Women Living with HIV and Who Inject Drugs in Ukraine.
Women living with HIV (WLWH) who inject drugs experience intersecting forms of stigma that adversely impact care engagement and health outcomes. We used latent profile analysis to identify typologies of intersecting stigma among WLWH who inject drugs and examined individual, social, and health care-related factors associated with these typologies. Surveys were collected from WLWH in Ukraine (n = 297) between 2019 and 2020. Six scales for internalized and enacted stigma related to HIV and drug use were used, then multinomial logistic regression assessed factors associated with profile membership. Four profiles emerged: "low stigma" (reference group, estimated 32.3% of the sample), "internalized stigma only" (49.2%), "social network stigma" (12.1%), and "provider stigma" (6.4%). Some degree of internalized stigma for both HIV and drug use was present across all profiles, including the reference group. Drug use stigma scores were generally higher than those for HIV. After adjusting for age, income, and time since HIV diagnosis, participants engaged in HIV care had significantly lower odds of being in the "provider stigma" profile compared to the reference group (aOR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.86, p < 0.05), while a higher frequency of injection drug use had greater association with the "provider stigma" profile (aOR = 8.26, 95% CI: 1.55-44.16, p < 0.05). History of intimate partner violence was associated with the "internalized stigma only" (aOR = 3.21, 95% CI: 1.51-6.82, p < 0.01) and "social network stigma" (aOR = 3.42, 95% CI: 1.15-10.22, p < 0.05) profiles. These findings illustrate the value of latent profile analysis in understanding intersectional stigma and highlight the need for tailored interventions to address stigma among WLWH who inject drugs.
期刊介绍:
AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76