{"title":"新加坡的母亲敏感性:早期教育者的信念和母亲报告的与观察到的行为。","authors":"Huimin Tasha Soh, Ann Low, Gwendolyn Ngoh, Lit Wee Sim, Shamini Sanmugam, Yue Yu, Jambay Dorji, Galih Kunarso, Gianluca Esposito, Ngiap Chuan Tan, Anne Rifkin-Graboi","doi":"10.1080/14616734.2025.2531320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To better understand perceptions and self-evaluations of sensitive caregiving in Singapore we examined observed (<i>n=</i>301) and self-reported (<i>n=</i>85) maternal behavior, as well as local early educators' (<i>n</i> = 57) opinions concerning ideal maternal behavior, which we then used to create a local MBQS ideal criterion. The association between local educators' MBQS sorting and the standard MBQS ideal criterion was <i>r</i> = 0.67, indicating alignment. Maternal observed and self-reported scores were not significantly associated (MBQS sensitivity criterion: <i>r</i> = -0.13, <i>p</i> = .317; Local criterion: <i>r</i> = -0.10, <i>p</i> = .441). Observed scores (Sensitivity: <i>M</i> = 0.21, Local criterion: <i>M</i> = 0.27) were lower than self-reported scores (Sensitivity: <i>M</i> = 0.62, <i>t</i>(63) = -8.05, <i>p</i> < .001; Local criterion: <i>M</i> = 0.59, <i>t</i>(57) = -7.77, <i>p</i> < .001). The findings reinforce those of past research concerning cross-cultural similarities and limitations in self-reports. Regarding interventional efforts, these point to the need to counter parental resistance to intervention as \"unnecessary\" with a better understanding of the limits of self-evaluation. Concerning interventional efficacy, the need for observational assessment of change is reinforced.</p>","PeriodicalId":8632,"journal":{"name":"Attachment & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal sensitivity in Singapore: early educators' beliefs and mothers' reported versus observed behavior.\",\"authors\":\"Huimin Tasha Soh, Ann Low, Gwendolyn Ngoh, Lit Wee Sim, Shamini Sanmugam, Yue Yu, Jambay Dorji, Galih Kunarso, Gianluca Esposito, Ngiap Chuan Tan, Anne Rifkin-Graboi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14616734.2025.2531320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To better understand perceptions and self-evaluations of sensitive caregiving in Singapore we examined observed (<i>n=</i>301) and self-reported (<i>n=</i>85) maternal behavior, as well as local early educators' (<i>n</i> = 57) opinions concerning ideal maternal behavior, which we then used to create a local MBQS ideal criterion. The association between local educators' MBQS sorting and the standard MBQS ideal criterion was <i>r</i> = 0.67, indicating alignment. Maternal observed and self-reported scores were not significantly associated (MBQS sensitivity criterion: <i>r</i> = -0.13, <i>p</i> = .317; Local criterion: <i>r</i> = -0.10, <i>p</i> = .441). Observed scores (Sensitivity: <i>M</i> = 0.21, Local criterion: <i>M</i> = 0.27) were lower than self-reported scores (Sensitivity: <i>M</i> = 0.62, <i>t</i>(63) = -8.05, <i>p</i> < .001; Local criterion: <i>M</i> = 0.59, <i>t</i>(57) = -7.77, <i>p</i> < .001). The findings reinforce those of past research concerning cross-cultural similarities and limitations in self-reports. Regarding interventional efforts, these point to the need to counter parental resistance to intervention as \\\"unnecessary\\\" with a better understanding of the limits of self-evaluation. Concerning interventional efficacy, the need for observational assessment of change is reinforced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Attachment & Human Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Attachment & Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2025.2531320\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attachment & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2025.2531320","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为了更好地理解新加坡人对敏感看护的看法和自我评价,我们研究了观察到的(n=301)和自我报告的(n=85)母亲行为,以及当地早期教育者(n= 57)对理想母亲行为的看法,然后我们用这些观点创建了当地MBQS理想标准。地方教育工作者MBQS分类与标准MBQS理想标准的相关性为r = 0.67,显示出一致性。产妇观察评分与自我报告评分无显著相关性(MBQS敏感性标准:r = -0.13, p = .317;局部标准:r = -0.10, p = .441)。观察评分(灵敏度:M = 0.21,局部标准:M = 0.27)低于自我报告评分(灵敏度:M = 0.62, t(63) = -8.05, p M = 0.59, t(57) = -7.77, p
Maternal sensitivity in Singapore: early educators' beliefs and mothers' reported versus observed behavior.
To better understand perceptions and self-evaluations of sensitive caregiving in Singapore we examined observed (n=301) and self-reported (n=85) maternal behavior, as well as local early educators' (n = 57) opinions concerning ideal maternal behavior, which we then used to create a local MBQS ideal criterion. The association between local educators' MBQS sorting and the standard MBQS ideal criterion was r = 0.67, indicating alignment. Maternal observed and self-reported scores were not significantly associated (MBQS sensitivity criterion: r = -0.13, p = .317; Local criterion: r = -0.10, p = .441). Observed scores (Sensitivity: M = 0.21, Local criterion: M = 0.27) were lower than self-reported scores (Sensitivity: M = 0.62, t(63) = -8.05, p < .001; Local criterion: M = 0.59, t(57) = -7.77, p < .001). The findings reinforce those of past research concerning cross-cultural similarities and limitations in self-reports. Regarding interventional efforts, these point to the need to counter parental resistance to intervention as "unnecessary" with a better understanding of the limits of self-evaluation. Concerning interventional efficacy, the need for observational assessment of change is reinforced.
期刊介绍:
Attachment & Human Development is the leading forum for the presentation of empirical research, reviews and clinical case studies that reflect contemporary advances in attachment theory and research. The journal addresses the growing demand from the domains of psychology, psychiatry, psychotherapy and related disciplines including nursing and social work, for a clear presentation of ideas, methods and research based on attachment theory.