新加坡的母亲敏感性:早期教育者的信念和母亲报告的与观察到的行为。

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Huimin Tasha Soh, Ann Low, Gwendolyn Ngoh, Lit Wee Sim, Shamini Sanmugam, Yue Yu, Jambay Dorji, Galih Kunarso, Gianluca Esposito, Ngiap Chuan Tan, Anne Rifkin-Graboi
{"title":"新加坡的母亲敏感性:早期教育者的信念和母亲报告的与观察到的行为。","authors":"Huimin Tasha Soh, Ann Low, Gwendolyn Ngoh, Lit Wee Sim, Shamini Sanmugam, Yue Yu, Jambay Dorji, Galih Kunarso, Gianluca Esposito, Ngiap Chuan Tan, Anne Rifkin-Graboi","doi":"10.1080/14616734.2025.2531320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To better understand perceptions and self-evaluations of sensitive caregiving in Singapore we examined observed (<i>n=</i>301) and self-reported (<i>n=</i>85) maternal behavior, as well as local early educators' (<i>n</i> = 57) opinions concerning ideal maternal behavior, which we then used to create a local MBQS ideal criterion. The association between local educators' MBQS sorting and the standard MBQS ideal criterion was <i>r</i> = 0.67, indicating alignment. Maternal observed and self-reported scores were not significantly associated (MBQS sensitivity criterion: <i>r</i> = -0.13, <i>p</i> = .317; Local criterion: <i>r</i> = -0.10, <i>p</i> = .441). Observed scores (Sensitivity: <i>M</i> = 0.21, Local criterion: <i>M</i> = 0.27) were lower than self-reported scores (Sensitivity: <i>M</i> = 0.62, <i>t</i>(63) = -8.05, <i>p</i> < .001; Local criterion: <i>M</i> = 0.59, <i>t</i>(57) = -7.77, <i>p</i> < .001). The findings reinforce those of past research concerning cross-cultural similarities and limitations in self-reports. Regarding interventional efforts, these point to the need to counter parental resistance to intervention as \"unnecessary\" with a better understanding of the limits of self-evaluation. Concerning interventional efficacy, the need for observational assessment of change is reinforced.</p>","PeriodicalId":8632,"journal":{"name":"Attachment & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal sensitivity in Singapore: early educators' beliefs and mothers' reported versus observed behavior.\",\"authors\":\"Huimin Tasha Soh, Ann Low, Gwendolyn Ngoh, Lit Wee Sim, Shamini Sanmugam, Yue Yu, Jambay Dorji, Galih Kunarso, Gianluca Esposito, Ngiap Chuan Tan, Anne Rifkin-Graboi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14616734.2025.2531320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To better understand perceptions and self-evaluations of sensitive caregiving in Singapore we examined observed (<i>n=</i>301) and self-reported (<i>n=</i>85) maternal behavior, as well as local early educators' (<i>n</i> = 57) opinions concerning ideal maternal behavior, which we then used to create a local MBQS ideal criterion. The association between local educators' MBQS sorting and the standard MBQS ideal criterion was <i>r</i> = 0.67, indicating alignment. Maternal observed and self-reported scores were not significantly associated (MBQS sensitivity criterion: <i>r</i> = -0.13, <i>p</i> = .317; Local criterion: <i>r</i> = -0.10, <i>p</i> = .441). Observed scores (Sensitivity: <i>M</i> = 0.21, Local criterion: <i>M</i> = 0.27) were lower than self-reported scores (Sensitivity: <i>M</i> = 0.62, <i>t</i>(63) = -8.05, <i>p</i> < .001; Local criterion: <i>M</i> = 0.59, <i>t</i>(57) = -7.77, <i>p</i> < .001). The findings reinforce those of past research concerning cross-cultural similarities and limitations in self-reports. Regarding interventional efforts, these point to the need to counter parental resistance to intervention as \\\"unnecessary\\\" with a better understanding of the limits of self-evaluation. Concerning interventional efficacy, the need for observational assessment of change is reinforced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Attachment & Human Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Attachment & Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2025.2531320\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attachment & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2025.2531320","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了更好地理解新加坡人对敏感看护的看法和自我评价,我们研究了观察到的(n=301)和自我报告的(n=85)母亲行为,以及当地早期教育者(n= 57)对理想母亲行为的看法,然后我们用这些观点创建了当地MBQS理想标准。地方教育工作者MBQS分类与标准MBQS理想标准的相关性为r = 0.67,显示出一致性。产妇观察评分与自我报告评分无显著相关性(MBQS敏感性标准:r = -0.13, p = .317;局部标准:r = -0.10, p = .441)。观察评分(灵敏度:M = 0.21,局部标准:M = 0.27)低于自我报告评分(灵敏度:M = 0.62, t(63) = -8.05, p M = 0.59, t(57) = -7.77, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maternal sensitivity in Singapore: early educators' beliefs and mothers' reported versus observed behavior.

To better understand perceptions and self-evaluations of sensitive caregiving in Singapore we examined observed (n=301) and self-reported (n=85) maternal behavior, as well as local early educators' (n = 57) opinions concerning ideal maternal behavior, which we then used to create a local MBQS ideal criterion. The association between local educators' MBQS sorting and the standard MBQS ideal criterion was r = 0.67, indicating alignment. Maternal observed and self-reported scores were not significantly associated (MBQS sensitivity criterion: r = -0.13, p = .317; Local criterion: r = -0.10, p = .441). Observed scores (Sensitivity: M = 0.21, Local criterion: M = 0.27) were lower than self-reported scores (Sensitivity: M = 0.62, t(63) = -8.05, p < .001; Local criterion: M = 0.59, t(57) = -7.77, p < .001). The findings reinforce those of past research concerning cross-cultural similarities and limitations in self-reports. Regarding interventional efforts, these point to the need to counter parental resistance to intervention as "unnecessary" with a better understanding of the limits of self-evaluation. Concerning interventional efficacy, the need for observational assessment of change is reinforced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Attachment & Human Development
Attachment & Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Attachment & Human Development is the leading forum for the presentation of empirical research, reviews and clinical case studies that reflect contemporary advances in attachment theory and research. The journal addresses the growing demand from the domains of psychology, psychiatry, psychotherapy and related disciplines including nursing and social work, for a clear presentation of ideas, methods and research based on attachment theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信