放疗结束时癌症患者的生活质量与德国普通人群样本的比较。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Alexander Fabian, Alexander Rühle, Gregor Liegl, Justus Domschikowski, Maike Trommer, Simone Ferdinandus, Jan-Niklas Becker, Georg Wurschi, Simon Boeke, Mathias Sonnhoff, Christoph Grott, Lukas Käsmann, Melanie Schneider, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Nils H Nicolay, David Krug, Sandra Nolte
{"title":"放疗结束时癌症患者的生活质量与德国普通人群样本的比较。","authors":"Alexander Fabian, Alexander Rühle, Gregor Liegl, Justus Domschikowski, Maike Trommer, Simone Ferdinandus, Jan-Niklas Becker, Georg Wurschi, Simon Boeke, Mathias Sonnhoff, Christoph Grott, Lukas Käsmann, Melanie Schneider, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Nils H Nicolay, David Krug, Sandra Nolte","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Germany has one of the highest cancer incidence rates in Europe. Radiotherapy is essential for patients with cancer as 50% have an evidence-based indication for radiotherapy. However, it is unknown how health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy compares to the general population in Germany. Therefore, we conducted a secondary analysis by pooling cross-sectional individual-level data from a multicenter cohort of cancer patients (n = 1052) undergoing radiotherapy across Germany and a normative sample from the German general population (n = 1006). We used the EORTC QLQ-C30 to measure global HRQoL (range: 0-100). Higher scores indicate higher HRQoL. We used ANOVA for univariable and ANCOVA with predefined covariates for multivariable analyses. As per univariable analysis, cancer patients had significantly lower global HRQoL compared with the general population (mean [M] = 54.6 vs. M = 65.9; p < .001). This difference was smaller but persisted in the multivariable analysis (M = 56.5 vs. M = 63.5; p < .001). Multivariable analyses stratified by education showed that HRQoL was only lower in cancer patients with medium (M = 56.2 vs. M = 63.0; p < .001) or high education (M = 57.0 vs. M = 66.5; p < .001) compared with the general population. The minimal important difference threshold of seven points was only met in the group with high education. In conclusion, there may be a meaningful gap in HRQoL of cancer patients at the end of radiotherapy compared with the general population, mainly in patients with higher educational levels. Upon validation, this would highlight the need for supportive care and optimized radiotherapy strategies to eventually close the HRQoL gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life in cancer patients at the end of radiotherapy compared to a general population sample in Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Fabian, Alexander Rühle, Gregor Liegl, Justus Domschikowski, Maike Trommer, Simone Ferdinandus, Jan-Niklas Becker, Georg Wurschi, Simon Boeke, Mathias Sonnhoff, Christoph Grott, Lukas Käsmann, Melanie Schneider, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Nils H Nicolay, David Krug, Sandra Nolte\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijc.70152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Germany has one of the highest cancer incidence rates in Europe. Radiotherapy is essential for patients with cancer as 50% have an evidence-based indication for radiotherapy. However, it is unknown how health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy compares to the general population in Germany. Therefore, we conducted a secondary analysis by pooling cross-sectional individual-level data from a multicenter cohort of cancer patients (n = 1052) undergoing radiotherapy across Germany and a normative sample from the German general population (n = 1006). We used the EORTC QLQ-C30 to measure global HRQoL (range: 0-100). Higher scores indicate higher HRQoL. We used ANOVA for univariable and ANCOVA with predefined covariates for multivariable analyses. As per univariable analysis, cancer patients had significantly lower global HRQoL compared with the general population (mean [M] = 54.6 vs. M = 65.9; p < .001). This difference was smaller but persisted in the multivariable analysis (M = 56.5 vs. M = 63.5; p < .001). Multivariable analyses stratified by education showed that HRQoL was only lower in cancer patients with medium (M = 56.2 vs. M = 63.0; p < .001) or high education (M = 57.0 vs. M = 66.5; p < .001) compared with the general population. The minimal important difference threshold of seven points was only met in the group with high education. In conclusion, there may be a meaningful gap in HRQoL of cancer patients at the end of radiotherapy compared with the general population, mainly in patients with higher educational levels. Upon validation, this would highlight the need for supportive care and optimized radiotherapy strategies to eventually close the HRQoL gap.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70152\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德国是欧洲癌症发病率最高的国家之一。放射治疗对癌症患者至关重要,因为50%的患者有放射治疗的循证指征。然而,目前尚不清楚接受放射治疗的癌症患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)与德国普通人群相比如何。因此,我们通过汇总来自德国接受放疗的多中心癌症患者(n = 1052)和来自德国普通人群(n = 1006)的标准样本的横断面个人水平数据进行了二次分析。我们使用EORTC QLQ-C30来测量整体HRQoL(范围:0-100)。分数越高,HRQoL越高。我们使用ANOVA进行单变量分析,ANCOVA与预定义的协变量进行多变量分析。根据单变量分析,与普通人群相比,癌症患者的整体HRQoL显著降低(mean [M] = 54.6 vs. M = 65.9
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of life in cancer patients at the end of radiotherapy compared to a general population sample in Germany.

Germany has one of the highest cancer incidence rates in Europe. Radiotherapy is essential for patients with cancer as 50% have an evidence-based indication for radiotherapy. However, it is unknown how health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy compares to the general population in Germany. Therefore, we conducted a secondary analysis by pooling cross-sectional individual-level data from a multicenter cohort of cancer patients (n = 1052) undergoing radiotherapy across Germany and a normative sample from the German general population (n = 1006). We used the EORTC QLQ-C30 to measure global HRQoL (range: 0-100). Higher scores indicate higher HRQoL. We used ANOVA for univariable and ANCOVA with predefined covariates for multivariable analyses. As per univariable analysis, cancer patients had significantly lower global HRQoL compared with the general population (mean [M] = 54.6 vs. M = 65.9; p < .001). This difference was smaller but persisted in the multivariable analysis (M = 56.5 vs. M = 63.5; p < .001). Multivariable analyses stratified by education showed that HRQoL was only lower in cancer patients with medium (M = 56.2 vs. M = 63.0; p < .001) or high education (M = 57.0 vs. M = 66.5; p < .001) compared with the general population. The minimal important difference threshold of seven points was only met in the group with high education. In conclusion, there may be a meaningful gap in HRQoL of cancer patients at the end of radiotherapy compared with the general population, mainly in patients with higher educational levels. Upon validation, this would highlight the need for supportive care and optimized radiotherapy strategies to eventually close the HRQoL gap.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信