芬兰农民通过of饲料添加剂和for in Dairy Farming:障碍和温室气体减排前景芬兰通过了农民的食品添加剂来减少温室气体排放,在奶牛:Futtermittelzus障碍及前景转一点zur Minderung von Treibhausgasen in der finnischen Milchviehhaltung: Barrieren und Perspektiven
Amer Ait Sidhoum, Timo Sipiläinen, Virpi Kling, Jarkko K. Niemi
{"title":"芬兰农民通过of饲料添加剂和for in Dairy Farming:障碍和温室气体减排前景芬兰通过了农民的食品添加剂来减少温室气体排放,在奶牛:Futtermittelzus障碍及前景转一点zur Minderung von Treibhausgasen in der finnischen Milchviehhaltung: Barrieren und Perspektiven","authors":"Amer Ait Sidhoum, Timo Sipiläinen, Virpi Kling, Jarkko K. Niemi","doi":"10.1111/1746-692X.12472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study offers valuable insights into farmers’ perspectives on the use of feed additives (3-NOP) in reducing methane emissions, and highlights associated obstacles that may prevent the accelerated uptake of GHG mitigation measures. Our data originate from a survey of 239 Finnish dairy farmers. While most farmers acknowledge the importance of climate issues, only a small percentage consider the reduction of the environmental impact of milk production to be the responsibility of the producer. Still, the farmers would prefer to decide for themselves how to reduce emissions, which demonstrates that resistance toward external directives might exist. In addition, there is a discrepancy between economically viable and environmentally responsible management, and this makes farmers more preoccupied with profitability. Furthermore, most farmers consider the feed additives to be safe. However, their efficiency in emission reduction remains unclear to many which contributes to hesitation in adoption. Thus, improved communication and education towards sustainable practices is needed. Strengthening dialogue among researchers, advisors, policymakers and farmers can help clarify the environmental purpose of feed additives and address uncertainties about their effectiveness and safety. Targeted educational efforts should focus on practical, science-based methods for methane reduction and build confidence through transparent information and real-life examples.</p>","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 2","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12472","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finnish Farmers’ Adoption of Feed Additives for GHG Mitigation in Dairy Farming: Barriers and Perspectives\\n Adoption par les agriculteurs finlandais d'additifs alimentaires pour la réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre dans l'élevage laitier : obstacles et perspectives\\n Futtermittelzusätze zur Minderung von Treibhausgasen in der finnischen Milchviehhaltung: Barrieren und Perspektiven\",\"authors\":\"Amer Ait Sidhoum, Timo Sipiläinen, Virpi Kling, Jarkko K. Niemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1746-692X.12472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study offers valuable insights into farmers’ perspectives on the use of feed additives (3-NOP) in reducing methane emissions, and highlights associated obstacles that may prevent the accelerated uptake of GHG mitigation measures. Our data originate from a survey of 239 Finnish dairy farmers. While most farmers acknowledge the importance of climate issues, only a small percentage consider the reduction of the environmental impact of milk production to be the responsibility of the producer. Still, the farmers would prefer to decide for themselves how to reduce emissions, which demonstrates that resistance toward external directives might exist. In addition, there is a discrepancy between economically viable and environmentally responsible management, and this makes farmers more preoccupied with profitability. Furthermore, most farmers consider the feed additives to be safe. However, their efficiency in emission reduction remains unclear to many which contributes to hesitation in adoption. Thus, improved communication and education towards sustainable practices is needed. Strengthening dialogue among researchers, advisors, policymakers and farmers can help clarify the environmental purpose of feed additives and address uncertainties about their effectiveness and safety. Targeted educational efforts should focus on practical, science-based methods for methane reduction and build confidence through transparent information and real-life examples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EuroChoices\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"63-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12472\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EuroChoices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1746-692X.12472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EuroChoices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1746-692X.12472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Finnish Farmers’ Adoption of Feed Additives for GHG Mitigation in Dairy Farming: Barriers and Perspectives
Adoption par les agriculteurs finlandais d'additifs alimentaires pour la réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre dans l'élevage laitier : obstacles et perspectives
Futtermittelzusätze zur Minderung von Treibhausgasen in der finnischen Milchviehhaltung: Barrieren und Perspektiven
This study offers valuable insights into farmers’ perspectives on the use of feed additives (3-NOP) in reducing methane emissions, and highlights associated obstacles that may prevent the accelerated uptake of GHG mitigation measures. Our data originate from a survey of 239 Finnish dairy farmers. While most farmers acknowledge the importance of climate issues, only a small percentage consider the reduction of the environmental impact of milk production to be the responsibility of the producer. Still, the farmers would prefer to decide for themselves how to reduce emissions, which demonstrates that resistance toward external directives might exist. In addition, there is a discrepancy between economically viable and environmentally responsible management, and this makes farmers more preoccupied with profitability. Furthermore, most farmers consider the feed additives to be safe. However, their efficiency in emission reduction remains unclear to many which contributes to hesitation in adoption. Thus, improved communication and education towards sustainable practices is needed. Strengthening dialogue among researchers, advisors, policymakers and farmers can help clarify the environmental purpose of feed additives and address uncertainties about their effectiveness and safety. Targeted educational efforts should focus on practical, science-based methods for methane reduction and build confidence through transparent information and real-life examples.
期刊介绍:
EuroChoices is a full colour, peer reviewed, outreach journal of topical European agri-food and rural resource issues, published three times a year in April, August and December. Its main aim is to bring current research and policy deliberations on agri-food and rural resource issues to a wide readership, both technical & non-technical. The need for this is clear - there are great changes afoot in the European and global agri-food industries and rural areas, which are of enormous impact and concern to society. The issues which underlie present deliberations in the policy and private sectors are complex and, until now, normally expressed in impenetrable technical language.