芬兰农民通过of饲料添加剂和for in Dairy Farming:障碍和温室气体减排前景芬兰通过了农民的食品添加剂来减少温室气体排放,在奶牛:Futtermittelzus障碍及前景转一点zur Minderung von Treibhausgasen in der finnischen Milchviehhaltung: Barrieren und Perspektiven

IF 3.1 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Amer Ait Sidhoum, Timo Sipiläinen, Virpi Kling, Jarkko K. Niemi
{"title":"芬兰农民通过of饲料添加剂和for in Dairy Farming:障碍和温室气体减排前景芬兰通过了农民的食品添加剂来减少温室气体排放,在奶牛:Futtermittelzus障碍及前景转一点zur Minderung von Treibhausgasen in der finnischen Milchviehhaltung: Barrieren und Perspektiven","authors":"Amer Ait Sidhoum,&nbsp;Timo Sipiläinen,&nbsp;Virpi Kling,&nbsp;Jarkko K. Niemi","doi":"10.1111/1746-692X.12472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study offers valuable insights into farmers’ perspectives on the use of feed additives (3-NOP) in reducing methane emissions, and highlights associated obstacles that may prevent the accelerated uptake of GHG mitigation measures. Our data originate from a survey of 239 Finnish dairy farmers. While most farmers acknowledge the importance of climate issues, only a small percentage consider the reduction of the environmental impact of milk production to be the responsibility of the producer. Still, the farmers would prefer to decide for themselves how to reduce emissions, which demonstrates that resistance toward external directives might exist. In addition, there is a discrepancy between economically viable and environmentally responsible management, and this makes farmers more preoccupied with profitability. Furthermore, most farmers consider the feed additives to be safe. However, their efficiency in emission reduction remains unclear to many which contributes to hesitation in adoption. Thus, improved communication and education towards sustainable practices is needed. Strengthening dialogue among researchers, advisors, policymakers and farmers can help clarify the environmental purpose of feed additives and address uncertainties about their effectiveness and safety. Targeted educational efforts should focus on practical, science-based methods for methane reduction and build confidence through transparent information and real-life examples.</p>","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 2","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12472","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finnish Farmers’ Adoption of Feed Additives for GHG Mitigation in Dairy Farming: Barriers and Perspectives\\n Adoption par les agriculteurs finlandais d'additifs alimentaires pour la réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre dans l'élevage laitier : obstacles et perspectives\\n Futtermittelzusätze zur Minderung von Treibhausgasen in der finnischen Milchviehhaltung: Barrieren und Perspektiven\",\"authors\":\"Amer Ait Sidhoum,&nbsp;Timo Sipiläinen,&nbsp;Virpi Kling,&nbsp;Jarkko K. Niemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1746-692X.12472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study offers valuable insights into farmers’ perspectives on the use of feed additives (3-NOP) in reducing methane emissions, and highlights associated obstacles that may prevent the accelerated uptake of GHG mitigation measures. Our data originate from a survey of 239 Finnish dairy farmers. While most farmers acknowledge the importance of climate issues, only a small percentage consider the reduction of the environmental impact of milk production to be the responsibility of the producer. Still, the farmers would prefer to decide for themselves how to reduce emissions, which demonstrates that resistance toward external directives might exist. In addition, there is a discrepancy between economically viable and environmentally responsible management, and this makes farmers more preoccupied with profitability. Furthermore, most farmers consider the feed additives to be safe. However, their efficiency in emission reduction remains unclear to many which contributes to hesitation in adoption. Thus, improved communication and education towards sustainable practices is needed. Strengthening dialogue among researchers, advisors, policymakers and farmers can help clarify the environmental purpose of feed additives and address uncertainties about their effectiveness and safety. Targeted educational efforts should focus on practical, science-based methods for methane reduction and build confidence through transparent information and real-life examples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EuroChoices\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"63-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12472\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EuroChoices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1746-692X.12472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EuroChoices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1746-692X.12472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究为农民对使用饲料添加剂(3-NOP)减少甲烷排放的看法提供了有价值的见解,并强调了可能阻碍加速吸收温室气体减缓措施的相关障碍。我们的数据来自对239名芬兰奶农的调查。虽然大多数农民承认气候问题的重要性,但只有一小部分人认为减少牛奶生产对环境的影响是生产者的责任。然而,农民更愿意自己决定如何减少排放,这表明对外部指令的抵制可能存在。此外,在经济上可行的管理和环境上负责任的管理之间存在差异,这使得农民更专注于盈利。此外,大多数农民认为饲料添加剂是安全的。然而,它们在减少排放方面的效率对许多人来说仍然不清楚,这导致他们在采用方面犹豫不决。因此,需要改进关于可持续做法的交流和教育。加强研究人员、顾问、政策制定者和农民之间的对话有助于澄清饲料添加剂的环境目的,并解决其有效性和安全性方面的不确定性。有针对性的教育工作应侧重于实用的、基于科学的甲烷减排方法,并通过透明的信息和现实生活中的例子建立信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Finnish Farmers’ Adoption of Feed Additives for GHG Mitigation in Dairy Farming: Barriers and Perspectives
      Adoption par les agriculteurs finlandais d'additifs alimentaires pour la réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre dans l'élevage laitier : obstacles et perspectives
      Futtermittelzusätze zur Minderung von Treibhausgasen in der finnischen Milchviehhaltung: Barrieren und Perspektiven

Finnish Farmers’ Adoption of Feed Additives for GHG Mitigation in Dairy Farming: Barriers and Perspectives Adoption par les agriculteurs finlandais d'additifs alimentaires pour la réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre dans l'élevage laitier : obstacles et perspectives Futtermittelzusätze zur Minderung von Treibhausgasen in der finnischen Milchviehhaltung: Barrieren und Perspektiven

This study offers valuable insights into farmers’ perspectives on the use of feed additives (3-NOP) in reducing methane emissions, and highlights associated obstacles that may prevent the accelerated uptake of GHG mitigation measures. Our data originate from a survey of 239 Finnish dairy farmers. While most farmers acknowledge the importance of climate issues, only a small percentage consider the reduction of the environmental impact of milk production to be the responsibility of the producer. Still, the farmers would prefer to decide for themselves how to reduce emissions, which demonstrates that resistance toward external directives might exist. In addition, there is a discrepancy between economically viable and environmentally responsible management, and this makes farmers more preoccupied with profitability. Furthermore, most farmers consider the feed additives to be safe. However, their efficiency in emission reduction remains unclear to many which contributes to hesitation in adoption. Thus, improved communication and education towards sustainable practices is needed. Strengthening dialogue among researchers, advisors, policymakers and farmers can help clarify the environmental purpose of feed additives and address uncertainties about their effectiveness and safety. Targeted educational efforts should focus on practical, science-based methods for methane reduction and build confidence through transparent information and real-life examples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EuroChoices
EuroChoices AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: EuroChoices is a full colour, peer reviewed, outreach journal of topical European agri-food and rural resource issues, published three times a year in April, August and December. Its main aim is to bring current research and policy deliberations on agri-food and rural resource issues to a wide readership, both technical & non-technical. The need for this is clear - there are great changes afoot in the European and global agri-food industries and rural areas, which are of enormous impact and concern to society. The issues which underlie present deliberations in the policy and private sectors are complex and, until now, normally expressed in impenetrable technical language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信