心血管疾病高危人群的HDL-C/LDL-C比值和全因死亡率:一项前瞻性观察队列研究

Q1 Medicine
Biting Lin, Yunzhi Ling, Gengyu Zhou, Ziqing Ruan, Fan Chen, Simiao Chen, Tingting Weng, Yuanfan Zhu, Jingyi Lin, Ling Yu, Kaiyang Lin
{"title":"心血管疾病高危人群的HDL-C/LDL-C比值和全因死亡率:一项前瞻性观察队列研究","authors":"Biting Lin,&nbsp;Yunzhi Ling,&nbsp;Gengyu Zhou,&nbsp;Ziqing Ruan,&nbsp;Fan Chen,&nbsp;Simiao Chen,&nbsp;Tingting Weng,&nbsp;Yuanfan Zhu,&nbsp;Jingyi Lin,&nbsp;Ling Yu,&nbsp;Kaiyang Lin","doi":"10.1002/cdt3.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The ratio of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) predicts cardiovascular disease (CVD) endpoints, yet its prognostic validity in high-risk populations and for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)-related adverse events remains unestablished.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study included 32,609 people aged 35–75 years in Fujian Province, China, who were at high risk for CVD. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during follow-up. Cox proportional hazard models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis were used to evaluate the correlation between the HDL-C/LDL-C ratio and the endpoints.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Result</h3>\n \n <p>On the basis of the restricted RCS curve, the participants were classified as having a low (&lt; 0.3), middle (0.3–0.5), or high (&gt; 0.5) HDL-C/LDL-C ratio. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that the risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.14–1.93, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01 for low; HR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.06–1.58, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 for high) was increased in the low and high groups. Participants without T2DM who were at high risk for CVD had similar prognoses (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.19–2.28, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01 for low; HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.05–1.74, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01 for high). However, this association was not found in participants with T2DM who were at high risk for CVD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>HDL-C/LDL-C can be used to predict the prognosis of individuals at high risk for CVD, and maintaining HDL-C/LDL-C ratios between 0.3 and 0.5 may be the most helpful range for this population. Furthermore, maintaining this ratio range holds clinical significance for cohorts without T2DM, although further exploration is needed in this T2DM cohort.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":32096,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"213-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cdt3.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HDL-C/LDL-C Ratio and All-Cause Mortality in Populations at High CVD Risk: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Biting Lin,&nbsp;Yunzhi Ling,&nbsp;Gengyu Zhou,&nbsp;Ziqing Ruan,&nbsp;Fan Chen,&nbsp;Simiao Chen,&nbsp;Tingting Weng,&nbsp;Yuanfan Zhu,&nbsp;Jingyi Lin,&nbsp;Ling Yu,&nbsp;Kaiyang Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cdt3.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The ratio of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) predicts cardiovascular disease (CVD) endpoints, yet its prognostic validity in high-risk populations and for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)-related adverse events remains unestablished.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study included 32,609 people aged 35–75 years in Fujian Province, China, who were at high risk for CVD. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during follow-up. Cox proportional hazard models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis were used to evaluate the correlation between the HDL-C/LDL-C ratio and the endpoints.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Result</h3>\\n \\n <p>On the basis of the restricted RCS curve, the participants were classified as having a low (&lt; 0.3), middle (0.3–0.5), or high (&gt; 0.5) HDL-C/LDL-C ratio. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that the risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.14–1.93, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01 for low; HR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.06–1.58, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 for high) was increased in the low and high groups. Participants without T2DM who were at high risk for CVD had similar prognoses (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.19–2.28, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01 for low; HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.05–1.74, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01 for high). However, this association was not found in participants with T2DM who were at high risk for CVD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>HDL-C/LDL-C can be used to predict the prognosis of individuals at high risk for CVD, and maintaining HDL-C/LDL-C ratios between 0.3 and 0.5 may be the most helpful range for this population. Furthermore, maintaining this ratio range holds clinical significance for cohorts without T2DM, although further exploration is needed in this T2DM cohort.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"213-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cdt3.70013\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cdt3.70013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cdt3.70013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)与低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的比值预测心血管疾病(CVD)终点,但其在高危人群和2型糖尿病(T2DM)相关不良事件中的预后有效性仍未确定。方法本研究纳入32609名年龄在35-75岁的中国福建省心血管疾病高危人群。主要终点是随访期间的全因死亡率。采用Cox比例风险模型和限制性三次样条(RCS)分析评价HDL-C/LDL-C比值与终点之间的相关性。结果根据限定RCS曲线,将参与者分为低(< 0.3)、中(0.3 - 0.5)和高(> 0.5) HDL-C/LDL-C比值。多因素Cox回归分析显示,低剂量组和高剂量组的全因死亡风险(HR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.14-1.93, p < 0.01)均增加(HR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.58, p < 0.05)。无T2DM的CVD高危患者预后相似(HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.19-2.28,低为0.01;HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.05-1.74,高为p <; 0.01)。然而,在心血管疾病高风险的2型糖尿病患者中没有发现这种关联。结论HDL-C/LDL-C可用于预测心血管疾病高危人群的预后,维持HDL-C/LDL-C比值在0.3 ~ 0.5之间可能是对该人群最有帮助的范围。此外,维持这一比例范围对于非T2DM队列具有临床意义,尽管在T2DM队列中需要进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

HDL-C/LDL-C Ratio and All-Cause Mortality in Populations at High CVD Risk: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

HDL-C/LDL-C Ratio and All-Cause Mortality in Populations at High CVD Risk: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Background

The ratio of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) predicts cardiovascular disease (CVD) endpoints, yet its prognostic validity in high-risk populations and for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)-related adverse events remains unestablished.

Methods

This study included 32,609 people aged 35–75 years in Fujian Province, China, who were at high risk for CVD. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during follow-up. Cox proportional hazard models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis were used to evaluate the correlation between the HDL-C/LDL-C ratio and the endpoints.

Result

On the basis of the restricted RCS curve, the participants were classified as having a low (< 0.3), middle (0.3–0.5), or high (> 0.5) HDL-C/LDL-C ratio. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that the risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.14–1.93, p < 0.01 for low; HR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.06–1.58, p < 0.05 for high) was increased in the low and high groups. Participants without T2DM who were at high risk for CVD had similar prognoses (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.19–2.28, p < 0.01 for low; HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.05–1.74, p < 0.01 for high). However, this association was not found in participants with T2DM who were at high risk for CVD.

Conclusion

HDL-C/LDL-C can be used to predict the prognosis of individuals at high risk for CVD, and maintaining HDL-C/LDL-C ratios between 0.3 and 0.5 may be the most helpful range for this population. Furthermore, maintaining this ratio range holds clinical significance for cohorts without T2DM, although further exploration is needed in this T2DM cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote progress from basic research to clinical practice and to provide a forum for communication among basic, translational, and clinical research practitioners and physicians from all relevant disciplines. Chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, stroke, chronic respiratory diseases (such as asthma and COPD), chronic kidney diseases, and related translational research. Topics of interest for Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine include Research and commentary on models of chronic diseases with significant implications for disease diagnosis and treatment Investigative studies of human biology with an emphasis on disease Perspectives and reviews on research topics that discuss the implications of findings from the viewpoints of basic science and clinical practic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信