评估形态参数对合成网格力学行为的影响。多元回归方法

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Vittoria Civilini, Alessandra Aldieri, Vincenzo Giacalone, Alberto L. Audenino, Mara Terzini
{"title":"评估形态参数对合成网格力学行为的影响。多元回归方法","authors":"Vittoria Civilini,&nbsp;Alessandra Aldieri,&nbsp;Vincenzo Giacalone,&nbsp;Alberto L. Audenino,&nbsp;Mara Terzini","doi":"10.1002/cnm.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The impact of morphological and mechanical parameters of surgical meshes on the healing processes and patient comfort after abdominal repair surgery is widely accepted. However, how the structure of the knitted pattern of synthetic meshes affects the mechanical behavior remains primarily theoretical. The objective of this study was therefore to assess the correlation between these key factors, identifying the most crucial morphological parameters able to support the design of new meshes. In this perspective, morphological parameters related to pore size, shape, and orientation were computed based on high-resolution images using the <i>poreScanner</i> app and the Matlab Image Processing toolbox. Additional parameters such as weight and thickness were measured through high-precision instruments. Concurrently, 12 mechanical parameters were assessed by executing a comprehensive testing protocol. Multivariate regression models were implemented, each using one to five morphological parameters as independent variables and one of the 12 mechanical parameters as dependent variables. A leave-one-out (LOO) validation algorithm was then employed to estimate the models' performance, robustness, and accuracy for potential future predictions. Regression models showed high coefficients of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.8), except for uniaxial strains (0.59 &lt; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &lt; 0.71). The LOO validation reveals good predictive capabilities (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.65) for 5 out of 12 mechanical parameters, whereas moderate predictive capabilities (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.55) for one model. Promising results demonstrate a quantifiable relationship between pore characteristics and mechanical behavior. Thanks to further validation using different meshes, the models could be beneficial for all stakeholders involved in this field, from patients to manufacturers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"41 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnm.70092","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Impact of Morphological Parameters on the Mechanical Behavior of Synthetic Meshes. A Multivariate Regression Approach\",\"authors\":\"Vittoria Civilini,&nbsp;Alessandra Aldieri,&nbsp;Vincenzo Giacalone,&nbsp;Alberto L. Audenino,&nbsp;Mara Terzini\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnm.70092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The impact of morphological and mechanical parameters of surgical meshes on the healing processes and patient comfort after abdominal repair surgery is widely accepted. However, how the structure of the knitted pattern of synthetic meshes affects the mechanical behavior remains primarily theoretical. The objective of this study was therefore to assess the correlation between these key factors, identifying the most crucial morphological parameters able to support the design of new meshes. In this perspective, morphological parameters related to pore size, shape, and orientation were computed based on high-resolution images using the <i>poreScanner</i> app and the Matlab Image Processing toolbox. Additional parameters such as weight and thickness were measured through high-precision instruments. Concurrently, 12 mechanical parameters were assessed by executing a comprehensive testing protocol. Multivariate regression models were implemented, each using one to five morphological parameters as independent variables and one of the 12 mechanical parameters as dependent variables. A leave-one-out (LOO) validation algorithm was then employed to estimate the models' performance, robustness, and accuracy for potential future predictions. Regression models showed high coefficients of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.8), except for uniaxial strains (0.59 &lt; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &lt; 0.71). The LOO validation reveals good predictive capabilities (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.65) for 5 out of 12 mechanical parameters, whereas moderate predictive capabilities (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.55) for one model. Promising results demonstrate a quantifiable relationship between pore characteristics and mechanical behavior. Thanks to further validation using different meshes, the models could be beneficial for all stakeholders involved in this field, from patients to manufacturers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"41 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnm.70092\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70092\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术补片的形态和力学参数对腹部修复术后愈合过程和患者舒适度的影响已被广泛接受。然而,如何编织图案的结构影响合成网格的力学行为仍然主要是理论上的。因此,本研究的目的是评估这些关键因素之间的相关性,确定能够支持新网格设计的最关键形态学参数。从这个角度来看,使用poresscanner应用程序和Matlab图像处理工具箱,基于高分辨率图像计算与孔隙大小、形状和方向相关的形态学参数。通过高精度仪器测量了重量和厚度等附加参数。同时,通过执行综合测试方案对12个力学参数进行评估。采用多变量回归模型,每个模型使用1 - 5个形态参数作为自变量,12个力学参数中的一个作为因变量。然后采用留一(LOO)验证算法来估计模型的性能、鲁棒性和对潜在未来预测的准确性。回归模型除单轴应变(0.59 < R2 < 0.71)外,其余均具有较高的决定系数(R2≥0.8)。LOO验证显示,12个机械参数中的5个具有良好的预测能力(R2 > 0.65),而一个模型的预测能力中等(R2 > 0.55)。有希望的结果表明,孔隙特征和力学行为之间存在可量化的关系。由于使用不同的网格进行进一步验证,这些模型可能对该领域的所有利益相关者(从患者到制造商)都有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the Impact of Morphological Parameters on the Mechanical Behavior of Synthetic Meshes. A Multivariate Regression Approach

Assessing the Impact of Morphological Parameters on the Mechanical Behavior of Synthetic Meshes. A Multivariate Regression Approach

The impact of morphological and mechanical parameters of surgical meshes on the healing processes and patient comfort after abdominal repair surgery is widely accepted. However, how the structure of the knitted pattern of synthetic meshes affects the mechanical behavior remains primarily theoretical. The objective of this study was therefore to assess the correlation between these key factors, identifying the most crucial morphological parameters able to support the design of new meshes. In this perspective, morphological parameters related to pore size, shape, and orientation were computed based on high-resolution images using the poreScanner app and the Matlab Image Processing toolbox. Additional parameters such as weight and thickness were measured through high-precision instruments. Concurrently, 12 mechanical parameters were assessed by executing a comprehensive testing protocol. Multivariate regression models were implemented, each using one to five morphological parameters as independent variables and one of the 12 mechanical parameters as dependent variables. A leave-one-out (LOO) validation algorithm was then employed to estimate the models' performance, robustness, and accuracy for potential future predictions. Regression models showed high coefficients of determination (R2 ≥ 0.8), except for uniaxial strains (0.59 < R2 < 0.71). The LOO validation reveals good predictive capabilities (R2 > 0.65) for 5 out of 12 mechanical parameters, whereas moderate predictive capabilities (R2 > 0.55) for one model. Promising results demonstrate a quantifiable relationship between pore characteristics and mechanical behavior. Thanks to further validation using different meshes, the models could be beneficial for all stakeholders involved in this field, from patients to manufacturers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信