群际联系会“适得其反”吗?比利时穆斯林青少年多数群体成员友谊的直接和间接二次迁移效应

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Kim Dierckx, Alain Van Hiel, Charlotte Maene, Peter J. Stevens, Jasper Van Assche
{"title":"群际联系会“适得其反”吗?比利时穆斯林青少年多数群体成员友谊的直接和间接二次迁移效应","authors":"Kim Dierckx,&nbsp;Alain Van Hiel,&nbsp;Charlotte Maene,&nbsp;Peter J. Stevens,&nbsp;Jasper Van Assche","doi":"10.1002/casp.70176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The present study investigated secondary transfer effects (STEs) of minority–majority friendships among ethnic-cultural minorities; that is, transfer effects of having cross-group friendships with majority group members on attitudes towards other minority outgroups. Simultaneously tackling three lacunas in literature, we (1) analysed a large dataset of adolescent Muslim minority pupils (<i>N</i> = 1750, mean age = 14.84), (2) examined processes underlying primary and secondary transfer and (3) investigated how one of Allport's ‘optimal contact conditions’, that is, authority (teacher) support, affects STEs. Overall, the results revealed little evidence for STEs, but there were two noteworthy exceptions. First, contrary to our hypotheses, a significant <i>negative direct</i> relationship was found between minority–majority friendships and attitudes towards two outgroups (Africans and refugees). Second, our results also revealed a significant <i>positive indirect</i> STE between minority–majority friendships and attitudes towards refugees, via attitudes towards the primary outgroup (Belgian majority group members). No cross-level interactions were found between cross-group friendships and school-level authority support, indicating that this ‘optimal condition’ does not seem to facilitate STEs. Taken together, our results cast reasonable doubt on the potential of STEs to ameliorate minority–minority relations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"35 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Intergroup Contact ‘Backfire’? Direct and Indirect Secondary Transfer Effects of Majority Group Member Friendships Among Belgian Muslim Adolescents\",\"authors\":\"Kim Dierckx,&nbsp;Alain Van Hiel,&nbsp;Charlotte Maene,&nbsp;Peter J. Stevens,&nbsp;Jasper Van Assche\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/casp.70176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The present study investigated secondary transfer effects (STEs) of minority–majority friendships among ethnic-cultural minorities; that is, transfer effects of having cross-group friendships with majority group members on attitudes towards other minority outgroups. Simultaneously tackling three lacunas in literature, we (1) analysed a large dataset of adolescent Muslim minority pupils (<i>N</i> = 1750, mean age = 14.84), (2) examined processes underlying primary and secondary transfer and (3) investigated how one of Allport's ‘optimal contact conditions’, that is, authority (teacher) support, affects STEs. Overall, the results revealed little evidence for STEs, but there were two noteworthy exceptions. First, contrary to our hypotheses, a significant <i>negative direct</i> relationship was found between minority–majority friendships and attitudes towards two outgroups (Africans and refugees). Second, our results also revealed a significant <i>positive indirect</i> STE between minority–majority friendships and attitudes towards refugees, via attitudes towards the primary outgroup (Belgian majority group members). No cross-level interactions were found between cross-group friendships and school-level authority support, indicating that this ‘optimal condition’ does not seem to facilitate STEs. Taken together, our results cast reasonable doubt on the potential of STEs to ameliorate minority–minority relations.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"35 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.70176\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.70176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了少数民族-文化少数民族-多数民族友谊的二次迁移效应;也就是说,与多数群体成员建立跨群体友谊对其他少数群体外群体态度的转移效应。在解决文献中的三个空白的同时,我们(1)分析了穆斯林少数民族青少年学生的大型数据集(N = 1750,平均年龄= 14.84),(2)检查了小学和中学迁移的过程,(3)调查了Allport的“最佳接触条件”之一,即权威(教师)支持如何影响STEs。总的来说,结果几乎没有显示出ste的证据,但有两个值得注意的例外。首先,与我们的假设相反,我们发现少数族裔与多数族裔之间的友谊与对两个外群体(非洲人和难民)的态度之间存在显著的负相关关系。其次,我们的研究结果还揭示了少数民族与多数民族之间的友谊和对难民的态度之间存在显著的间接STE,这是通过对主要外群体(比利时多数群体成员)的态度来实现的。在跨群体友谊和学校层面的权威支持之间没有发现跨层次的相互作用,这表明这种“最佳条件”似乎并没有促进ste的发展。综上所述,我们的研究结果合理地怀疑sti在改善少数民族与少数民族关系方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Intergroup Contact ‘Backfire’? Direct and Indirect Secondary Transfer Effects of Majority Group Member Friendships Among Belgian Muslim Adolescents

The present study investigated secondary transfer effects (STEs) of minority–majority friendships among ethnic-cultural minorities; that is, transfer effects of having cross-group friendships with majority group members on attitudes towards other minority outgroups. Simultaneously tackling three lacunas in literature, we (1) analysed a large dataset of adolescent Muslim minority pupils (N = 1750, mean age = 14.84), (2) examined processes underlying primary and secondary transfer and (3) investigated how one of Allport's ‘optimal contact conditions’, that is, authority (teacher) support, affects STEs. Overall, the results revealed little evidence for STEs, but there were two noteworthy exceptions. First, contrary to our hypotheses, a significant negative direct relationship was found between minority–majority friendships and attitudes towards two outgroups (Africans and refugees). Second, our results also revealed a significant positive indirect STE between minority–majority friendships and attitudes towards refugees, via attitudes towards the primary outgroup (Belgian majority group members). No cross-level interactions were found between cross-group friendships and school-level authority support, indicating that this ‘optimal condition’ does not seem to facilitate STEs. Taken together, our results cast reasonable doubt on the potential of STEs to ameliorate minority–minority relations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology publishes papers regarding social behaviour in relation to community problems and strengths. The journal is international in scope, reflecting the common concerns of scholars and community practitioners in Europe and worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信