在一个文化和语言复杂的书群中,话语的疏离和断开

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Literacy Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1111/lit.70002
Jackie Ridley
{"title":"在一个文化和语言复杂的书群中,话语的疏离和断开","authors":"Jackie Ridley","doi":"10.1111/lit.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Using data collected during a qualitative study of a book group in an after-school programme at a public, urban elementary school, in this article, I analyse how immigrant- and refugee-background students discursively distanced themselves from the portrayal of refugees in the text <i>Outcasts United</i>. The teacher chose this book because she believed it reflected students' own experiences. Yet they often resisted making personal connections to the refugee stories depicted, instead employing various discursive strategies to distance themselves and their experiences from those in the text. The study uses microethnographic and discourse analytical methods to examine interactions where students redirected conversations away from teacher-proposed connections. Findings underscore how connection-making is not universally straightforward or applicable, especially when assuming shared identities among minoritized students. By analysing instances where students engaged in distancing and disconnection-making, this study emphasizes the value of fostering both connections and disconnections in literacy instruction. Implications for educators include the creation of spaces that encourage diverse, authentic responses to texts, as well as future teacher training and curriculum design that fosters students' ability to push against narratives with which they disagree. This approach could enrich the development of inclusive literacy practices that better serve multilingual students from diverse cultural and linguistic contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46082,"journal":{"name":"Literacy","volume":"59 3","pages":"336-346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lit.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discursive distancing and disconnection-making in a culturally and linguistically complex book group\",\"authors\":\"Jackie Ridley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lit.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Using data collected during a qualitative study of a book group in an after-school programme at a public, urban elementary school, in this article, I analyse how immigrant- and refugee-background students discursively distanced themselves from the portrayal of refugees in the text <i>Outcasts United</i>. The teacher chose this book because she believed it reflected students' own experiences. Yet they often resisted making personal connections to the refugee stories depicted, instead employing various discursive strategies to distance themselves and their experiences from those in the text. The study uses microethnographic and discourse analytical methods to examine interactions where students redirected conversations away from teacher-proposed connections. Findings underscore how connection-making is not universally straightforward or applicable, especially when assuming shared identities among minoritized students. By analysing instances where students engaged in distancing and disconnection-making, this study emphasizes the value of fostering both connections and disconnections in literacy instruction. Implications for educators include the creation of spaces that encourage diverse, authentic responses to texts, as well as future teacher training and curriculum design that fosters students' ability to push against narratives with which they disagree. This approach could enrich the development of inclusive literacy practices that better serve multilingual students from diverse cultural and linguistic contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Literacy\",\"volume\":\"59 3\",\"pages\":\"336-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lit.70002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lit.70002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lit.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我利用在一所公立城市小学的课外活动中对一个读书小组进行的定性研究中收集的数据,分析了移民和难民背景的学生如何在话语中使自己与课文《流浪者联合》中对难民的描绘保持距离。老师选择这本书是因为她相信它反映了学生们自己的经历。然而,他们经常拒绝将个人与所描绘的难民故事联系起来,而是采用各种话语策略将自己和自己的经历与文本中的故事拉开距离。该研究使用微观人种学和话语分析方法来检查学生将对话从教师建议的连接中转移的互动。研究结果强调,建立联系并不是普遍直接或适用的,尤其是在少数族裔学生拥有共同身份的情况下。通过分析学生进行疏远和断开连接的实例,本研究强调了在读写教学中同时培养连接和断开连接的价值。对教育工作者的启示包括创造空间,鼓励对文本的多样化、真实的回应,以及未来的教师培训和课程设计,培养学生反对他们不同意的叙述的能力。这种方法可以丰富包容性扫盲实践的发展,更好地为来自不同文化和语言背景的多语种学生服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discursive distancing and disconnection-making in a culturally and linguistically complex book group

Using data collected during a qualitative study of a book group in an after-school programme at a public, urban elementary school, in this article, I analyse how immigrant- and refugee-background students discursively distanced themselves from the portrayal of refugees in the text Outcasts United. The teacher chose this book because she believed it reflected students' own experiences. Yet they often resisted making personal connections to the refugee stories depicted, instead employing various discursive strategies to distance themselves and their experiences from those in the text. The study uses microethnographic and discourse analytical methods to examine interactions where students redirected conversations away from teacher-proposed connections. Findings underscore how connection-making is not universally straightforward or applicable, especially when assuming shared identities among minoritized students. By analysing instances where students engaged in distancing and disconnection-making, this study emphasizes the value of fostering both connections and disconnections in literacy instruction. Implications for educators include the creation of spaces that encourage diverse, authentic responses to texts, as well as future teacher training and curriculum design that fosters students' ability to push against narratives with which they disagree. This approach could enrich the development of inclusive literacy practices that better serve multilingual students from diverse cultural and linguistic contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy
Literacy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Literacy is the official journal of the United Kingdom Literacy Association (formerly the United Kingdom Reading Association), the professional association for teachers of literacy. Literacy is a refereed journal for those interested in the study and development of literacy. Its readership comprises practitioners, teacher educators, researchers and both undergraduate and graduate students. Literacy offers educators a forum for debate through scrutinising research evidence, reflecting on analysed accounts of innovative practice and examining recent policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信