使用虚拟现实吸引本科生进行环境实地体验

Elizabeth W. Stoner, Steven C. Salina, Erin M. Johnson, Elizabeth R. Whitman, Stephanie K. Archer, Brodie S. McPherson, Alexana Cranmer
{"title":"使用虚拟现实吸引本科生进行环境实地体验","authors":"Elizabeth W. Stoner,&nbsp;Steven C. Salina,&nbsp;Erin M. Johnson,&nbsp;Elizabeth R. Whitman,&nbsp;Stephanie K. Archer,&nbsp;Brodie S. McPherson,&nbsp;Alexana Cranmer","doi":"10.1002/fer3.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field-based experiences enhance cognitive and affective skill sets of undergraduate students. Although field-based learning is a highly effective pedagogical modality, it is not accessible to all students, necessitating the development and evaluation of alternate modalities that convey equivalent benefits. Virtual reality (VR) may allow students to engage in experiences without requiring them to be physically present within a field environment. Although VR is gaining popularity, there are limited examples of using it to simulate field experiences and of its efficacy in influencing student learning gains and attitudes toward environmental content. Therefore, we created immersive 360° cinematic VR (CVR) experiences focused on coastal marine ecosystems and compared them to traditional modalities: a field course and 2D videos focused on the same content. Students (<i>n</i> = 86) across science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and non-STEM majors from three institutions—Bentley University, Florida International University, and Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium—were given a preassessment/postassessment to understand learning gains and attitude changes related to each modality. Although significant learning gains happened across all modalities, CVR students experienced the greatest learning gains, though postscores were correlated with prescores and CVR students had lower prescores than field course students. There were no cross-institutional or major-related differences in learning gains for field course students. Students across all modalities experienced shifts in attitudes, with consistent increases in the use of keywords related to coastal marine ecosystems in postassessments. Ultimately, CVR is an effective supplement or alternative for undergraduate students who cannot access in-person field-based experiences and may be particularly impactful for non-STEM majors.</p>","PeriodicalId":100564,"journal":{"name":"Future in Educational Research","volume":"3 3","pages":"409-434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fer3.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of virtual reality to engage undergraduate students in environmental field experiences\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth W. Stoner,&nbsp;Steven C. Salina,&nbsp;Erin M. Johnson,&nbsp;Elizabeth R. Whitman,&nbsp;Stephanie K. Archer,&nbsp;Brodie S. McPherson,&nbsp;Alexana Cranmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fer3.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Field-based experiences enhance cognitive and affective skill sets of undergraduate students. Although field-based learning is a highly effective pedagogical modality, it is not accessible to all students, necessitating the development and evaluation of alternate modalities that convey equivalent benefits. Virtual reality (VR) may allow students to engage in experiences without requiring them to be physically present within a field environment. Although VR is gaining popularity, there are limited examples of using it to simulate field experiences and of its efficacy in influencing student learning gains and attitudes toward environmental content. Therefore, we created immersive 360° cinematic VR (CVR) experiences focused on coastal marine ecosystems and compared them to traditional modalities: a field course and 2D videos focused on the same content. Students (<i>n</i> = 86) across science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and non-STEM majors from three institutions—Bentley University, Florida International University, and Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium—were given a preassessment/postassessment to understand learning gains and attitude changes related to each modality. Although significant learning gains happened across all modalities, CVR students experienced the greatest learning gains, though postscores were correlated with prescores and CVR students had lower prescores than field course students. There were no cross-institutional or major-related differences in learning gains for field course students. Students across all modalities experienced shifts in attitudes, with consistent increases in the use of keywords related to coastal marine ecosystems in postassessments. Ultimately, CVR is an effective supplement or alternative for undergraduate students who cannot access in-person field-based experiences and may be particularly impactful for non-STEM majors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future in Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"409-434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fer3.70003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future in Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fer3.70003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future in Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fer3.70003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实地体验增强了大学生的认知和情感技能。虽然实地学习是一种非常有效的教学方式,但并非所有学生都能使用,因此需要开发和评价具有同等效益的替代方式。虚拟现实(VR)可以让学生参与体验,而不需要他们实际出现在现场环境中。尽管VR越来越受欢迎,但使用它来模拟实地体验的例子有限,它在影响学生学习成果和对环境内容态度方面的有效性也有限。因此,我们创建了专注于沿海海洋生态系统的沉浸式360°电影VR (CVR)体验,并将其与传统模式进行了比较:实地课程和专注于相同内容的2D视频。来自宾利大学、佛罗里达国际大学和路易斯安那大学海洋联盟三所机构的科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)和非STEM专业的学生(n = 86)进行了预评估/后评估,以了解与每种模式相关的学习收益和态度变化。尽管在所有模式中都有显著的学习收益,但CVR学生的学习收益最大,尽管得分与预分相关,而且CVR学生的预分低于实地课程学生。实地课程学生在学习收益方面没有跨机构或专业相关的差异。所有模式的学生都经历了态度的转变,在后评估中使用与沿海海洋生态系统相关的关键词的人数持续增加。最终,对于那些无法获得实地经验的本科生来说,CVR是一种有效的补充或替代方案,对非stem专业的学生尤其有影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of virtual reality to engage undergraduate students in environmental field experiences

Use of virtual reality to engage undergraduate students in environmental field experiences

Field-based experiences enhance cognitive and affective skill sets of undergraduate students. Although field-based learning is a highly effective pedagogical modality, it is not accessible to all students, necessitating the development and evaluation of alternate modalities that convey equivalent benefits. Virtual reality (VR) may allow students to engage in experiences without requiring them to be physically present within a field environment. Although VR is gaining popularity, there are limited examples of using it to simulate field experiences and of its efficacy in influencing student learning gains and attitudes toward environmental content. Therefore, we created immersive 360° cinematic VR (CVR) experiences focused on coastal marine ecosystems and compared them to traditional modalities: a field course and 2D videos focused on the same content. Students (n = 86) across science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and non-STEM majors from three institutions—Bentley University, Florida International University, and Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium—were given a preassessment/postassessment to understand learning gains and attitude changes related to each modality. Although significant learning gains happened across all modalities, CVR students experienced the greatest learning gains, though postscores were correlated with prescores and CVR students had lower prescores than field course students. There were no cross-institutional or major-related differences in learning gains for field course students. Students across all modalities experienced shifts in attitudes, with consistent increases in the use of keywords related to coastal marine ecosystems in postassessments. Ultimately, CVR is an effective supplement or alternative for undergraduate students who cannot access in-person field-based experiences and may be particularly impactful for non-STEM majors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信