Wesley N. Almeida, Sérgio L. G. Nogueira-Filho, Kamila S. Barros, Selene S. C. Nogueira
{"title":"自由放养的岩豚鼠(kerdon rupestris)用不同的警报叫声来传达威胁的紧迫性","authors":"Wesley N. Almeida, Sérgio L. G. Nogueira-Filho, Kamila S. Barros, Selene S. C. Nogueira","doi":"10.1111/eth.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines whether rock cavies (<i>Kerodon rupestris</i>), which are social rodents, modulate their alarm calls in response to various threat contexts. Conducted across four sample areas within two study sites in the Brazilian Caatinga region, alarm calls were collected using the ad libitum method. The acoustic responses of free-ranging rock cavies were then analyzed using discriminant function analysis and generalized mixed linear models to classify vocal types and assess differences in vocalization rates and acoustic parameters. The findings reveal that rock cavies produce both slow and fast alarm whistles in response to threats. Fast alarm whistles, emitted exclusively in response to nearby ocelots (<i>Leopardus pardalis</i>), exhibited a lower pitch (<i>F</i><sub>1,16.20</sub> = 11.41, <i>p</i> = 0.004), shorter duration (<i>F</i><sub>1,22.59</sub> = 14.93, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and shorter pulse intervals (<i>F</i><sub>1,21.29</sub> = 6.08, <i>p</i> = 0.022) compared to the slow alarm whistles. Slow alarm whistles were produced when rock cavies were threatened by distant ocelots, as well as by both distant and closer humans, dogs (<i>Canis familiaris</i>), marmosets (<i>Callithrix</i> spp.), tayras (<i>Eira barbara</i>), and birds of prey (<i>Caracara plancus</i>). The type of threat influenced the pulse intervals (<i>F</i><sub>6,23.26</sub> = 12.69, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the high frequency (<i>F</i><sub>6,18.15</sub> = 12.08, <i>p</i> < 0.001) of slow alarm whistles. Rock cavies produced shorter pulse intervals when threatened by ocelots, birds of prey, or tayras compared to humans and dogs (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and higher-pitched slow alarm whistles when threatened by dogs, ocelots, humans, or birds of prey compared to capuchin monkeys and tayras (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, shorter pulse intervals (<i>F</i><sub>1,25.73</sub> = 28.87, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were emitted when threats were nearby compared to more distant threats. This study highlights the influence of various threats and their proximity on the modulation of rock cavy alarm calls, showcasing their behavioral adaptability. This crucial survival strategy not only enhances our understanding of rock cavies' behavior but also has the potential to inspire research in other species and ecological contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"131 10","pages":"175-186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Free-Range Rock Cavy (Kerodon rupestris) Communicates the Urgency of a Threat Using Different Alarm Calls\",\"authors\":\"Wesley N. Almeida, Sérgio L. G. Nogueira-Filho, Kamila S. Barros, Selene S. C. Nogueira\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eth.70009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study examines whether rock cavies (<i>Kerodon rupestris</i>), which are social rodents, modulate their alarm calls in response to various threat contexts. Conducted across four sample areas within two study sites in the Brazilian Caatinga region, alarm calls were collected using the ad libitum method. The acoustic responses of free-ranging rock cavies were then analyzed using discriminant function analysis and generalized mixed linear models to classify vocal types and assess differences in vocalization rates and acoustic parameters. The findings reveal that rock cavies produce both slow and fast alarm whistles in response to threats. Fast alarm whistles, emitted exclusively in response to nearby ocelots (<i>Leopardus pardalis</i>), exhibited a lower pitch (<i>F</i><sub>1,16.20</sub> = 11.41, <i>p</i> = 0.004), shorter duration (<i>F</i><sub>1,22.59</sub> = 14.93, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and shorter pulse intervals (<i>F</i><sub>1,21.29</sub> = 6.08, <i>p</i> = 0.022) compared to the slow alarm whistles. Slow alarm whistles were produced when rock cavies were threatened by distant ocelots, as well as by both distant and closer humans, dogs (<i>Canis familiaris</i>), marmosets (<i>Callithrix</i> spp.), tayras (<i>Eira barbara</i>), and birds of prey (<i>Caracara plancus</i>). The type of threat influenced the pulse intervals (<i>F</i><sub>6,23.26</sub> = 12.69, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the high frequency (<i>F</i><sub>6,18.15</sub> = 12.08, <i>p</i> < 0.001) of slow alarm whistles. Rock cavies produced shorter pulse intervals when threatened by ocelots, birds of prey, or tayras compared to humans and dogs (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and higher-pitched slow alarm whistles when threatened by dogs, ocelots, humans, or birds of prey compared to capuchin monkeys and tayras (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, shorter pulse intervals (<i>F</i><sub>1,25.73</sub> = 28.87, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were emitted when threats were nearby compared to more distant threats. This study highlights the influence of various threats and their proximity on the modulation of rock cavy alarm calls, showcasing their behavioral adaptability. This crucial survival strategy not only enhances our understanding of rock cavies' behavior but also has the potential to inspire research in other species and ecological contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethology\",\"volume\":\"131 10\",\"pages\":\"175-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.70009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.70009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.70009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项研究考察了穴居动物(kerdon rupestris)是否会根据不同的威胁情况调节它们的警报。在巴西卡廷加地区的两个研究地点的四个样本地区进行,使用随机方法收集警报电话。然后,利用判别函数分析和广义混合线性模型对自由放养岩洞的声学响应进行分析,对发声类型进行分类,并评估发声率和声学参数的差异。研究结果表明,岩洞在面对威胁时会发出快速和缓慢的警报声。与慢速警报哨声相比,快速警报哨声具有较低的音调(F1,16.20 = 11.41, p = 0.004)、较短的持续时间(F1,22.59 = 14.93, p = 0.001)和较短的脉冲间隔(F1,21.29 = 6.08, p = 0.022)。当岩洞受到遥远的豹猫、遥远的或近的人类、狗(Canis familiaris)、狨猴(Callithrix spp.)、狐獴(Eira barbara)和猛禽(Caracara plancus)的威胁时,它们会发出缓慢的警报声。威胁类型影响慢速警笛的脉冲间隔(F6,23.26 = 12.69, p < 0.001)和高频(F6,18.15 = 12.08, p < 0.001)。与人类和狗相比,岩洞在受到豹猫、猛禽或泰拉的威胁时产生更短的脉冲间隔(p < 0.05),而在受到狗、豹猫、人类或猛禽的威胁时,与卷尾猴和泰拉相比,岩洞发出更高音调的缓慢警报哨声(p < 0.05)。此外,与较远的威胁相比,威胁在附近时发出的脉冲间隔更短(F1,25.73 = 28.87, p < 0.001)。本研究强调了各种威胁及其邻近程度对岩鼠报警信号调制的影响,展示了岩鼠的行为适应性。这种至关重要的生存策略不仅增强了我们对岩洞行为的理解,而且有可能启发其他物种和生态环境的研究。
The Free-Range Rock Cavy (Kerodon rupestris) Communicates the Urgency of a Threat Using Different Alarm Calls
This study examines whether rock cavies (Kerodon rupestris), which are social rodents, modulate their alarm calls in response to various threat contexts. Conducted across four sample areas within two study sites in the Brazilian Caatinga region, alarm calls were collected using the ad libitum method. The acoustic responses of free-ranging rock cavies were then analyzed using discriminant function analysis and generalized mixed linear models to classify vocal types and assess differences in vocalization rates and acoustic parameters. The findings reveal that rock cavies produce both slow and fast alarm whistles in response to threats. Fast alarm whistles, emitted exclusively in response to nearby ocelots (Leopardus pardalis), exhibited a lower pitch (F1,16.20 = 11.41, p = 0.004), shorter duration (F1,22.59 = 14.93, p = 0.001), and shorter pulse intervals (F1,21.29 = 6.08, p = 0.022) compared to the slow alarm whistles. Slow alarm whistles were produced when rock cavies were threatened by distant ocelots, as well as by both distant and closer humans, dogs (Canis familiaris), marmosets (Callithrix spp.), tayras (Eira barbara), and birds of prey (Caracara plancus). The type of threat influenced the pulse intervals (F6,23.26 = 12.69, p < 0.001) and the high frequency (F6,18.15 = 12.08, p < 0.001) of slow alarm whistles. Rock cavies produced shorter pulse intervals when threatened by ocelots, birds of prey, or tayras compared to humans and dogs (p < 0.05) and higher-pitched slow alarm whistles when threatened by dogs, ocelots, humans, or birds of prey compared to capuchin monkeys and tayras (p < 0.05). Additionally, shorter pulse intervals (F1,25.73 = 28.87, p < 0.001) were emitted when threats were nearby compared to more distant threats. This study highlights the influence of various threats and their proximity on the modulation of rock cavy alarm calls, showcasing their behavioral adaptability. This crucial survival strategy not only enhances our understanding of rock cavies' behavior but also has the potential to inspire research in other species and ecological contexts.
期刊介绍:
International in scope, Ethology publishes original research on behaviour including physiological mechanisms, function, and evolution. The Journal addresses behaviour in all species, from slime moulds to humans. Experimental research is preferred, both from the field and the lab, which is grounded in a theoretical framework. The section ''Perspectives and Current Debates'' provides an overview of the field and may include theoretical investigations and essays on controversial topics.