不同工作休息比的高强度间歇训练对青少年跆拳道运动员特定体能的影响

IF 3
Ning Xu, Yadong Xue, Meng Zhang
{"title":"不同工作休息比的高强度间歇训练对青少年跆拳道运动员特定体能的影响","authors":"Ning Xu,&nbsp;Yadong Xue,&nbsp;Meng Zhang","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) with different work-to-rest ratios during the same training duration on the specific physical fitness of Chinese adolescent taekwondo athletes (<i>N</i> = 30, 16–20 years, 18 males and 12 females, and provincial champion/runner-up or national top 6). Athletes were randomly allocated to HIIT-20S (20 s work: 10 s rest), HIIT-30S (30 s work: 10 s rest), and a control group (2 min actual combat competitive: 1 min rest). An 8-week intervention (24 sessions, 30 min/session). Specific physical fitness was assessed using the progressive specific taekwondo test, frequency speed of kick test, 10-s high roundhouse kick test, 60-s double chop kick test, heart rate recovery (HRR), 1 repetition maximum (1-RM) squat test, and improved Illinois agility test. Statistical significance was defined as <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05. Compared with the HIIT-20S (1.96%) and control (0.47%) groups, the HIIT-30S group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in VO2peak (4.72%). In the FSKT10S test, the HIIT-20S group performed better than the HIIT-30S group (2.24% vs. 1.34%), whereas the HIIT-30S group showed higher gains in FSKTtotal (5.09% vs. 2%) and a steeper decline in KDI (−21.7% vs. −12.1%). Similarly, the HIIT-20S group outperformed the HIIT-30S group in the 10S-HRK test (3.62% vs. 0.91%), whereas the HIIT-30S group outperformed the 60S-DCK test (3.45% vs. 1.91%). Improvements in agility favored the HIIT-20S group (−8.26% vs. HIIT-30S: −4.01%; control: −0.85%). Both HIIT groups showed enhanced heart rate recovery (HIIT-30S, 2.74% and HIIT-20S, 2.57%), although no significant differences were observed in lower limb maximal strength. These findings confirm the specificity of the work-to-rest ratio: HIIT-30S effectively enhances cardiorespiratory endurance and repeated kicking endurance, whereas HIIT-20S appears to be more beneficial for optimizing explosive strength, agility, kick speed, and frequency.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training With Varying Work-to-Rest Ratios on Specific Physical Fitness in Adolescent Taekwondo Athletes\",\"authors\":\"Ning Xu,&nbsp;Yadong Xue,&nbsp;Meng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.70050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigated the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) with different work-to-rest ratios during the same training duration on the specific physical fitness of Chinese adolescent taekwondo athletes (<i>N</i> = 30, 16–20 years, 18 males and 12 females, and provincial champion/runner-up or national top 6). Athletes were randomly allocated to HIIT-20S (20 s work: 10 s rest), HIIT-30S (30 s work: 10 s rest), and a control group (2 min actual combat competitive: 1 min rest). An 8-week intervention (24 sessions, 30 min/session). Specific physical fitness was assessed using the progressive specific taekwondo test, frequency speed of kick test, 10-s high roundhouse kick test, 60-s double chop kick test, heart rate recovery (HRR), 1 repetition maximum (1-RM) squat test, and improved Illinois agility test. Statistical significance was defined as <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05. Compared with the HIIT-20S (1.96%) and control (0.47%) groups, the HIIT-30S group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in VO2peak (4.72%). In the FSKT10S test, the HIIT-20S group performed better than the HIIT-30S group (2.24% vs. 1.34%), whereas the HIIT-30S group showed higher gains in FSKTtotal (5.09% vs. 2%) and a steeper decline in KDI (−21.7% vs. −12.1%). Similarly, the HIIT-20S group outperformed the HIIT-30S group in the 10S-HRK test (3.62% vs. 0.91%), whereas the HIIT-30S group outperformed the 60S-DCK test (3.45% vs. 1.91%). Improvements in agility favored the HIIT-20S group (−8.26% vs. HIIT-30S: −4.01%; control: −0.85%). Both HIIT groups showed enhanced heart rate recovery (HIIT-30S, 2.74% and HIIT-20S, 2.57%), although no significant differences were observed in lower limb maximal strength. These findings confirm the specificity of the work-to-rest ratio: HIIT-30S effectively enhances cardiorespiratory endurance and repeated kicking endurance, whereas HIIT-20S appears to be more beneficial for optimizing explosive strength, agility, kick speed, and frequency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":\"25 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70050\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了相同训练时间内不同劳息比的高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对中国青少年跆拳道运动员(30名,16-20岁,男18名,女12名,省冠军/亚军或全国前6名)特定体质的影响。运动员随机分为HIIT-20S组(20秒工作:10秒休息)、HIIT-30S组(30秒工作:10秒休息)和对照组(2分钟实战竞技:1分钟休息)。为期8周的干预(24次,每次30分钟)。采用进步性特定跆拳道测试、踢腿频率速度测试、10秒高回旋踢腿测试、60秒双劈腿测试、心率恢复(HRR)、1次最大重复(1- rm)深蹲测试和改进伊利诺伊敏捷性测试来评估特定体能。统计学意义定义为p <; 0.05。与HIIT-20S组(1.96%)和对照组(0.47%)相比,HIIT-30S组的VO2peak改善明显(4.72%)。在FSKT10S测试中,HIIT-20S组比HIIT-30S组表现更好(2.24%比1.34%),而HIIT-30S组在FSKTtotal中表现出更高的增长(5.09%比2%)和更陡峭的KDI下降(- 21.7%比- 12.1%)。同样,在10S-HRK测试中,HIIT-20S组优于HIIT-30S组(3.62%比0.91%),而HIIT-30S组优于60S-DCK测试(3.45%比1.91%)。敏捷性的提高有利于HIIT-20S组(- 8.26% vs. HIIT-30S组:- 4.01%;对照组:- 0.85%)。两个HIIT组均显示心率恢复增强(HIIT- 30s为2.74%,HIIT- 20s为2.57%),但下肢最大力量无显著差异。这些发现证实了工作休息比的特殊性:HIIT-30S有效地提高了心肺耐力和重复踢腿耐力,而HIIT-20S似乎更有利于优化爆发力、敏捷性、踢腿速度和频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training With Varying Work-to-Rest Ratios on Specific Physical Fitness in Adolescent Taekwondo Athletes

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training With Varying Work-to-Rest Ratios on Specific Physical Fitness in Adolescent Taekwondo Athletes

This study investigated the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) with different work-to-rest ratios during the same training duration on the specific physical fitness of Chinese adolescent taekwondo athletes (N = 30, 16–20 years, 18 males and 12 females, and provincial champion/runner-up or national top 6). Athletes were randomly allocated to HIIT-20S (20 s work: 10 s rest), HIIT-30S (30 s work: 10 s rest), and a control group (2 min actual combat competitive: 1 min rest). An 8-week intervention (24 sessions, 30 min/session). Specific physical fitness was assessed using the progressive specific taekwondo test, frequency speed of kick test, 10-s high roundhouse kick test, 60-s double chop kick test, heart rate recovery (HRR), 1 repetition maximum (1-RM) squat test, and improved Illinois agility test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Compared with the HIIT-20S (1.96%) and control (0.47%) groups, the HIIT-30S group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in VO2peak (4.72%). In the FSKT10S test, the HIIT-20S group performed better than the HIIT-30S group (2.24% vs. 1.34%), whereas the HIIT-30S group showed higher gains in FSKTtotal (5.09% vs. 2%) and a steeper decline in KDI (−21.7% vs. −12.1%). Similarly, the HIIT-20S group outperformed the HIIT-30S group in the 10S-HRK test (3.62% vs. 0.91%), whereas the HIIT-30S group outperformed the 60S-DCK test (3.45% vs. 1.91%). Improvements in agility favored the HIIT-20S group (−8.26% vs. HIIT-30S: −4.01%; control: −0.85%). Both HIIT groups showed enhanced heart rate recovery (HIIT-30S, 2.74% and HIIT-20S, 2.57%), although no significant differences were observed in lower limb maximal strength. These findings confirm the specificity of the work-to-rest ratio: HIIT-30S effectively enhances cardiorespiratory endurance and repeated kicking endurance, whereas HIIT-20S appears to be more beneficial for optimizing explosive strength, agility, kick speed, and frequency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信