经济衰退和生态影响:欧洲皮草养殖的未来是什么?Declineconomique et impact ecologique:欧洲毛皮动物养殖的未来?经济衰退和生态影响:欧洲毛皮养殖业的未来是什么?

IF 3.1 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Martina Bozzola, Farah Hamdan
{"title":"经济衰退和生态影响:欧洲皮草养殖的未来是什么?Declineconomique et impact ecologique:欧洲毛皮动物养殖的未来?经济衰退和生态影响:欧洲毛皮养殖业的未来是什么?","authors":"Martina Bozzola,&nbsp;Farah Hamdan","doi":"10.1111/1746-692X.12468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The economic, ecological and animal welfare impacts of fur farming in the European Union have been debated for decades, culminating in proposals for an EU-wide ban on keeping animals solely for fur production. The Covid-19 pandemic further intensified these discussions, particularly within individual Member States.</p><p>This study analyses the economic trends, environmental consequences and disease risks associated with fur farming, providing insights to inform political and societal debate. Our findings indicate that, even before the pandemic, fur exports and consumer demand were in steady decline. This trend has been driven by shifting consumer preferences, major fashion brands phasing out fur, and growing concerns over animal welfare and sustainability. Additionally, the industry has been linked to biodiversity threats, zoonotic disease transmission, and negative environmental impacts, including a high carbon footprint.</p><p>While concerns remain over the relocation of fur farming to regions with weaker regulations, the industry requires a strategic transition. Supporting fur farmers in shifting to alternative activities, for example, through training, targeted subsidies, compensation and other policy incentives, can help repurpose land and employment towards viable and sustainable alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 2","pages":"79-86"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12468","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Decline and Ecological Impact: What Future for European Fur Farming?\\n Déclin économique et impact écologique : quel avenir pour l’élevage d'animaux à fourrure en Europe ?\\n Wirtschaftlicher Niedergang und ökologische Auswirkungen: Was bringt die Zukunft für die europäische Pelztierzucht?\",\"authors\":\"Martina Bozzola,&nbsp;Farah Hamdan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1746-692X.12468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The economic, ecological and animal welfare impacts of fur farming in the European Union have been debated for decades, culminating in proposals for an EU-wide ban on keeping animals solely for fur production. The Covid-19 pandemic further intensified these discussions, particularly within individual Member States.</p><p>This study analyses the economic trends, environmental consequences and disease risks associated with fur farming, providing insights to inform political and societal debate. Our findings indicate that, even before the pandemic, fur exports and consumer demand were in steady decline. This trend has been driven by shifting consumer preferences, major fashion brands phasing out fur, and growing concerns over animal welfare and sustainability. Additionally, the industry has been linked to biodiversity threats, zoonotic disease transmission, and negative environmental impacts, including a high carbon footprint.</p><p>While concerns remain over the relocation of fur farming to regions with weaker regulations, the industry requires a strategic transition. Supporting fur farmers in shifting to alternative activities, for example, through training, targeted subsidies, compensation and other policy incentives, can help repurpose land and employment towards viable and sustainable alternatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EuroChoices\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"79-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12468\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EuroChoices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1746-692X.12468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EuroChoices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1746-692X.12468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧盟,皮草养殖对经济、生态和动物福利的影响已经争论了几十年,最终有人提议在欧盟范围内禁止仅为皮草生产而饲养动物。2019冠状病毒病大流行进一步加强了这些讨论,特别是在个别会员国内部。本研究分析了与毛皮养殖相关的经济趋势、环境后果和疾病风险,为政治和社会辩论提供了见解。我们的研究结果表明,即使在大流行之前,毛皮出口和消费者需求也在稳步下降。这一趋势是由消费者偏好的转变、主要时尚品牌逐步淘汰皮草、以及对动物福利和可持续性的日益关注推动的。此外,该行业还与生物多样性威胁、人畜共患疾病传播和负面环境影响(包括高碳足迹)有关。虽然人们仍然担心毛皮养殖业会转移到监管较弱的地区,但该行业需要进行战略转型。支持毛皮农民转向其他活动,例如通过培训、有针对性的补贴、补偿和其他政策奖励,可以帮助重新利用土地和就业,转向可行和可持续的替代办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Economic Decline and Ecological Impact: What Future for European Fur Farming?
      Déclin économique et impact écologique : quel avenir pour l’élevage d'animaux à fourrure en Europe ?
      Wirtschaftlicher Niedergang und ökologische Auswirkungen: Was bringt die Zukunft für die europäische Pelztierzucht?

Economic Decline and Ecological Impact: What Future for European Fur Farming? Déclin économique et impact écologique : quel avenir pour l’élevage d'animaux à fourrure en Europe ? Wirtschaftlicher Niedergang und ökologische Auswirkungen: Was bringt die Zukunft für die europäische Pelztierzucht?

The economic, ecological and animal welfare impacts of fur farming in the European Union have been debated for decades, culminating in proposals for an EU-wide ban on keeping animals solely for fur production. The Covid-19 pandemic further intensified these discussions, particularly within individual Member States.

This study analyses the economic trends, environmental consequences and disease risks associated with fur farming, providing insights to inform political and societal debate. Our findings indicate that, even before the pandemic, fur exports and consumer demand were in steady decline. This trend has been driven by shifting consumer preferences, major fashion brands phasing out fur, and growing concerns over animal welfare and sustainability. Additionally, the industry has been linked to biodiversity threats, zoonotic disease transmission, and negative environmental impacts, including a high carbon footprint.

While concerns remain over the relocation of fur farming to regions with weaker regulations, the industry requires a strategic transition. Supporting fur farmers in shifting to alternative activities, for example, through training, targeted subsidies, compensation and other policy incentives, can help repurpose land and employment towards viable and sustainable alternatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EuroChoices
EuroChoices AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: EuroChoices is a full colour, peer reviewed, outreach journal of topical European agri-food and rural resource issues, published three times a year in April, August and December. Its main aim is to bring current research and policy deliberations on agri-food and rural resource issues to a wide readership, both technical & non-technical. The need for this is clear - there are great changes afoot in the European and global agri-food industries and rural areas, which are of enormous impact and concern to society. The issues which underlie present deliberations in the policy and private sectors are complex and, until now, normally expressed in impenetrable technical language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信