蔗渣生产生物燃料的技术经济评价

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Ayanda S. Buthelezi, Manimagalay Chetty, Amir H. Mohammadi
{"title":"蔗渣生产生物燃料的技术经济评价","authors":"Ayanda S. Buthelezi,&nbsp;Manimagalay Chetty,&nbsp;Amir H. Mohammadi","doi":"10.1002/ese3.70178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The cooperative effect of climate change, rising fossil fuel prices and global fossil fuel depletion necessitates the production and use of renewable energy nationally and globally. The need for more energy-producing methods is growing as energy consumption rises. A techno-economic assessment (TEA) delivers an in-depth analysis of the financial feasibility of these processes, informing investment choices and policy development for biofuel advancement. Three biological biomass-to-fuel conversion routes were investigated in this study: fermentation for bioethanol production, anaerobic digestion (AD) for biogas production and dark fermentation (DF) for biohydrogen production. Aspen Plus software simulations were performed to process 51840 kg/h sugarcane bagasse (SCB). The discounted cash flow method was used for economic assessment using the tax rate of 28% and the discount rate of 12%, with a straight-line depreciation of 20% for 5 years. The plant life was assumed to be 25 years. The most profitable method was DF with an net present value (NPV) of 67.41 million USD, a payback period (PBP) of 3.3 years, an ROI of 1.51 and a PI of 7.95. Biogas production ranked second with an NPV of 37.57 million USD, a PBP of 4.4 years, an ROI of 1.16 and a PI of 5.85. Under conditions assumed in the study, bioethanol production was not feasible at all with the negative NPV. The project will not be able to recover its initial investment at the end of the plant's life.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 9","pages":"4270-4286"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70178","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-Economic Assessment of Biofuels Production From Sugarcane Bagasse\",\"authors\":\"Ayanda S. Buthelezi,&nbsp;Manimagalay Chetty,&nbsp;Amir H. Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ese3.70178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The cooperative effect of climate change, rising fossil fuel prices and global fossil fuel depletion necessitates the production and use of renewable energy nationally and globally. The need for more energy-producing methods is growing as energy consumption rises. A techno-economic assessment (TEA) delivers an in-depth analysis of the financial feasibility of these processes, informing investment choices and policy development for biofuel advancement. Three biological biomass-to-fuel conversion routes were investigated in this study: fermentation for bioethanol production, anaerobic digestion (AD) for biogas production and dark fermentation (DF) for biohydrogen production. Aspen Plus software simulations were performed to process 51840 kg/h sugarcane bagasse (SCB). The discounted cash flow method was used for economic assessment using the tax rate of 28% and the discount rate of 12%, with a straight-line depreciation of 20% for 5 years. The plant life was assumed to be 25 years. The most profitable method was DF with an net present value (NPV) of 67.41 million USD, a payback period (PBP) of 3.3 years, an ROI of 1.51 and a PI of 7.95. Biogas production ranked second with an NPV of 37.57 million USD, a PBP of 4.4 years, an ROI of 1.16 and a PI of 5.85. Under conditions assumed in the study, bioethanol production was not feasible at all with the negative NPV. The project will not be able to recover its initial investment at the end of the plant's life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"4270-4286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70178\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70178\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化、化石燃料价格上涨和全球化石燃料枯竭的共同作用,要求各国和全球生产和使用可再生能源。随着能源消耗的增加,对更多能源生产方式的需求也在增长。技术经济评估(TEA)对这些过程的财务可行性进行了深入分析,为生物燃料发展的投资选择和政策制定提供了信息。本研究研究了三种生物生物质转化为燃料的途径:发酵生产生物乙醇,厌氧消化(AD)生产沼气和暗发酵(DF)生产生物氢。采用Aspen Plus软件对51840 kg/h甘蔗渣(SCB)进行了模拟处理。采用现金流折现法进行经济评估,税率为28%,贴现率为12%,直线折旧20%,5年。这种植物的寿命假定为25年。最赚钱的方法是DF,净现值(NPV)为6741万美元,投资回收期(PBP)为3.3年,ROI为1.51,PI为7.95。沼气生产位居第二,NPV为3757万美元,PBP为4.4年,ROI为1.16,PI为5.85。在本研究假设的条件下,由于净现值为负,生物乙醇生产完全不可行。该项目在工厂寿命结束时将无法收回其初始投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Techno-Economic Assessment of Biofuels Production From Sugarcane Bagasse

Techno-Economic Assessment of Biofuels Production From Sugarcane Bagasse

Techno-Economic Assessment of Biofuels Production From Sugarcane Bagasse

Techno-Economic Assessment of Biofuels Production From Sugarcane Bagasse

Techno-Economic Assessment of Biofuels Production From Sugarcane Bagasse

The cooperative effect of climate change, rising fossil fuel prices and global fossil fuel depletion necessitates the production and use of renewable energy nationally and globally. The need for more energy-producing methods is growing as energy consumption rises. A techno-economic assessment (TEA) delivers an in-depth analysis of the financial feasibility of these processes, informing investment choices and policy development for biofuel advancement. Three biological biomass-to-fuel conversion routes were investigated in this study: fermentation for bioethanol production, anaerobic digestion (AD) for biogas production and dark fermentation (DF) for biohydrogen production. Aspen Plus software simulations were performed to process 51840 kg/h sugarcane bagasse (SCB). The discounted cash flow method was used for economic assessment using the tax rate of 28% and the discount rate of 12%, with a straight-line depreciation of 20% for 5 years. The plant life was assumed to be 25 years. The most profitable method was DF with an net present value (NPV) of 67.41 million USD, a payback period (PBP) of 3.3 years, an ROI of 1.51 and a PI of 7.95. Biogas production ranked second with an NPV of 37.57 million USD, a PBP of 4.4 years, an ROI of 1.16 and a PI of 5.85. Under conditions assumed in the study, bioethanol production was not feasible at all with the negative NPV. The project will not be able to recover its initial investment at the end of the plant's life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信