上帝2.0吗?

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
M. Therese Lysaught
{"title":"上帝2.0吗?","authors":"M. Therese Lysaught","doi":"10.1002/hast.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Robert L. Klitzman's</i> Doctor, Will You Pray for Me? Medicine, Chaplains, and Healing the Whole Person <i>(Oxford University Press, 2024) offers a fervent apology for the increasingly crucial role of chaplains in contemporary health care. It weaves together anthropological data from interviews with a chaplain cohort, personal narrative, patient stories, chaplain testimony, and the social scientific study of religion. It also surfaces pointed questions about the assumptions that shape contemporary chaplaincy and the directions in which it is moving. These questions include the following: How might we clarify and strengthen the ambiguous and tensive relationship between chaplaincy and bioethics? How do we assess the normativity of the perduring Kantian/Jamesian account of religion and spirituality, which is highly individualized and emotivist? And in light of this, is chaplaincy simply becoming the institutionalized form of religion for twenty-first-century neoliberalized health care?</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"55 4","pages":"41-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"God 2.0?\",\"authors\":\"M. Therese Lysaught\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hast.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Robert L. Klitzman's</i> Doctor, Will You Pray for Me? Medicine, Chaplains, and Healing the Whole Person <i>(Oxford University Press, 2024) offers a fervent apology for the increasingly crucial role of chaplains in contemporary health care. It weaves together anthropological data from interviews with a chaplain cohort, personal narrative, patient stories, chaplain testimony, and the social scientific study of religion. It also surfaces pointed questions about the assumptions that shape contemporary chaplaincy and the directions in which it is moving. These questions include the following: How might we clarify and strengthen the ambiguous and tensive relationship between chaplaincy and bioethics? How do we assess the normativity of the perduring Kantian/Jamesian account of religion and spirituality, which is highly individualized and emotivist? And in light of this, is chaplaincy simply becoming the institutionalized form of religion for twenty-first-century neoliberalized health care?</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"volume\":\"55 4\",\"pages\":\"41-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.70001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

罗伯特·l·克里兹曼的《医生,你会为我祈祷吗?》医学,牧师和治愈整个人(牛津大学出版社,2024)为牧师在当代医疗保健中日益重要的作用提供了热烈的道歉。它将对牧师群体的访谈、个人叙述、病人故事、牧师证词和宗教的社会科学研究中的人类学数据编织在一起。它还暴露了一些尖锐的问题,这些问题是关于塑造当代牧师制度的假设及其发展方向的。这些问题包括:我们如何澄清和加强牧师和生命伦理之间模糊而紧张的关系?我们如何评估康德/詹姆斯对宗教和灵性的长期描述的规范性,这是高度个性化和情感主义的?鉴于此,牧师是否已经成为二十一世纪新自由主义医疗保健的制度化宗教形式?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
God 2.0?

Robert L. Klitzman's Doctor, Will You Pray for Me? Medicine, Chaplains, and Healing the Whole Person (Oxford University Press, 2024) offers a fervent apology for the increasingly crucial role of chaplains in contemporary health care. It weaves together anthropological data from interviews with a chaplain cohort, personal narrative, patient stories, chaplain testimony, and the social scientific study of religion. It also surfaces pointed questions about the assumptions that shape contemporary chaplaincy and the directions in which it is moving. These questions include the following: How might we clarify and strengthen the ambiguous and tensive relationship between chaplaincy and bioethics? How do we assess the normativity of the perduring Kantian/Jamesian account of religion and spirituality, which is highly individualized and emotivist? And in light of this, is chaplaincy simply becoming the institutionalized form of religion for twenty-first-century neoliberalized health care?.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信