{"title":"上帝2.0吗?","authors":"M. Therese Lysaught","doi":"10.1002/hast.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Robert L. Klitzman's</i> Doctor, Will You Pray for Me? Medicine, Chaplains, and Healing the Whole Person <i>(Oxford University Press, 2024) offers a fervent apology for the increasingly crucial role of chaplains in contemporary health care. It weaves together anthropological data from interviews with a chaplain cohort, personal narrative, patient stories, chaplain testimony, and the social scientific study of religion. It also surfaces pointed questions about the assumptions that shape contemporary chaplaincy and the directions in which it is moving. These questions include the following: How might we clarify and strengthen the ambiguous and tensive relationship between chaplaincy and bioethics? How do we assess the normativity of the perduring Kantian/Jamesian account of religion and spirituality, which is highly individualized and emotivist? And in light of this, is chaplaincy simply becoming the institutionalized form of religion for twenty-first-century neoliberalized health care?</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"55 4","pages":"41-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"God 2.0?\",\"authors\":\"M. Therese Lysaught\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hast.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Robert L. Klitzman's</i> Doctor, Will You Pray for Me? Medicine, Chaplains, and Healing the Whole Person <i>(Oxford University Press, 2024) offers a fervent apology for the increasingly crucial role of chaplains in contemporary health care. It weaves together anthropological data from interviews with a chaplain cohort, personal narrative, patient stories, chaplain testimony, and the social scientific study of religion. It also surfaces pointed questions about the assumptions that shape contemporary chaplaincy and the directions in which it is moving. These questions include the following: How might we clarify and strengthen the ambiguous and tensive relationship between chaplaincy and bioethics? How do we assess the normativity of the perduring Kantian/Jamesian account of religion and spirituality, which is highly individualized and emotivist? And in light of this, is chaplaincy simply becoming the institutionalized form of religion for twenty-first-century neoliberalized health care?</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"volume\":\"55 4\",\"pages\":\"41-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.70001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robert L. Klitzman's Doctor, Will You Pray for Me? Medicine, Chaplains, and Healing the Whole Person (Oxford University Press, 2024) offers a fervent apology for the increasingly crucial role of chaplains in contemporary health care. It weaves together anthropological data from interviews with a chaplain cohort, personal narrative, patient stories, chaplain testimony, and the social scientific study of religion. It also surfaces pointed questions about the assumptions that shape contemporary chaplaincy and the directions in which it is moving. These questions include the following: How might we clarify and strengthen the ambiguous and tensive relationship between chaplaincy and bioethics? How do we assess the normativity of the perduring Kantian/Jamesian account of religion and spirituality, which is highly individualized and emotivist? And in light of this, is chaplaincy simply becoming the institutionalized form of religion for twenty-first-century neoliberalized health care?.
期刊介绍:
The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.