Federica Tamburini, Valerio Cozzani, Nicola Paltrinieri, Thomas Alan Adams II
{"title":"权衡新兴绿色技术的风险与温室气体减排效益","authors":"Federica Tamburini, Valerio Cozzani, Nicola Paltrinieri, Thomas Alan Adams II","doi":"10.1002/cjce.25692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Green technologies represent promising strategies for mitigating carbon emissions and combating global warming. However, their implementation in civil and industrial applications is not without risks, as intrinsic uncertainties and latent safety concerns can threaten their effective deployment. To quantitatively evaluate the trade-off between environmental benefits and safety issues, this work develops an innovative methodological approach. This approach aims to determine the risk–benefit profile of emerging green solutions through the definition and calculation of a new key performance indicator, the risk of CO<sub>2</sub> avoided index (RCAI). By doing so, it provides a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of the green technology implementation and serves as a powerful tool for supporting stakeholder decision-making. In order to demonstrate the systematic nature and versatility of the methodological approach, it has been applied to a case study involving a carbon capture and storage (CCS) system retrofitted onto a power plant. The results underscore its flexibility and effectiveness, highlighting the importance of sustainable and safe technological advancements in the fight against global warming.</p>","PeriodicalId":9400,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"103 10","pages":"4661-4680"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjce.25692","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weighing risks against GHG reduction benefits in emerging green technologies\",\"authors\":\"Federica Tamburini, Valerio Cozzani, Nicola Paltrinieri, Thomas Alan Adams II\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjce.25692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Green technologies represent promising strategies for mitigating carbon emissions and combating global warming. However, their implementation in civil and industrial applications is not without risks, as intrinsic uncertainties and latent safety concerns can threaten their effective deployment. To quantitatively evaluate the trade-off between environmental benefits and safety issues, this work develops an innovative methodological approach. This approach aims to determine the risk–benefit profile of emerging green solutions through the definition and calculation of a new key performance indicator, the risk of CO<sub>2</sub> avoided index (RCAI). By doing so, it provides a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of the green technology implementation and serves as a powerful tool for supporting stakeholder decision-making. In order to demonstrate the systematic nature and versatility of the methodological approach, it has been applied to a case study involving a carbon capture and storage (CCS) system retrofitted onto a power plant. The results underscore its flexibility and effectiveness, highlighting the importance of sustainable and safe technological advancements in the fight against global warming.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"103 10\",\"pages\":\"4661-4680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjce.25692\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25692\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Weighing risks against GHG reduction benefits in emerging green technologies
Green technologies represent promising strategies for mitigating carbon emissions and combating global warming. However, their implementation in civil and industrial applications is not without risks, as intrinsic uncertainties and latent safety concerns can threaten their effective deployment. To quantitatively evaluate the trade-off between environmental benefits and safety issues, this work develops an innovative methodological approach. This approach aims to determine the risk–benefit profile of emerging green solutions through the definition and calculation of a new key performance indicator, the risk of CO2 avoided index (RCAI). By doing so, it provides a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of the green technology implementation and serves as a powerful tool for supporting stakeholder decision-making. In order to demonstrate the systematic nature and versatility of the methodological approach, it has been applied to a case study involving a carbon capture and storage (CCS) system retrofitted onto a power plant. The results underscore its flexibility and effectiveness, highlighting the importance of sustainable and safe technological advancements in the fight against global warming.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE) publishes original research articles, new theoretical interpretation or experimental findings and critical reviews in the science or industrial practice of chemical and biochemical processes. Preference is given to papers having a clearly indicated scope and applicability in any of the following areas: Fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, multiphase flows, separations processes, thermodynamics, process systems engineering, reactors and reaction kinetics, catalysis, interfacial phenomena, electrochemical phenomena, bioengineering, minerals processing and natural products and environmental and energy engineering. Papers that merely describe or present a conventional or routine analysis of existing processes will not be considered.