这是健康的。这对你有好处:孩子们在写作课堂上运用自主权的观点

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Literacy Pub Date : 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1111/lit.70011
Ross Young, Melanie Ramdarshan-Bold, Christina Clark, Sarah McGeown
{"title":"这是健康的。这对你有好处:孩子们在写作课堂上运用自主权的观点","authors":"Ross Young,&nbsp;Melanie Ramdarshan-Bold,&nbsp;Christina Clark,&nbsp;Sarah McGeown","doi":"10.1111/lit.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Growing concern about children's writing motivation highlights the need for more research that foregrounds pupil autonomy and examines how classroom practices influence students' sense of agency and control in their writing. This study adopts a self-determination theory (SDT) perspective to explore the role of autonomy and locus of control in shaping writing motivation among primary-aged students. Specifically, it reports on a qualitative interview study with 24 children (aged 9–11, 50% female) from three primary schools in England, focusing on their feelings and experiences of autonomy in relation to school-based writing. Thematic analysis, illustrated within Graham's (2018) production strategies for writing, identified three key themes relating to children's perceptions of the locus of control for their writing and the extent to which this was held by, or shared between, the teachers or themselves, with (a) teacher-controlled writing, (b) student-controlled writing and (c) collaboratively-controlled writing themes identified. Children's perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of teacher and student-controlled writing are discussed, before their thoughts on a ‘collaboratively-controlled writing’ approach are shared. This research provides novel and important insights for educators, researchers and policy-makers into how collaboratively-controlled writing projects could enhance primary students' writing motivation, and contributes to current discourse on effective and affecting writing pedagogy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46082,"journal":{"name":"Literacy","volume":"59 3","pages":"372-384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lit.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘It's healthy. It's good for you’: Children's perspectives on utilising their autonomy in the writing classroom\",\"authors\":\"Ross Young,&nbsp;Melanie Ramdarshan-Bold,&nbsp;Christina Clark,&nbsp;Sarah McGeown\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lit.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Growing concern about children's writing motivation highlights the need for more research that foregrounds pupil autonomy and examines how classroom practices influence students' sense of agency and control in their writing. This study adopts a self-determination theory (SDT) perspective to explore the role of autonomy and locus of control in shaping writing motivation among primary-aged students. Specifically, it reports on a qualitative interview study with 24 children (aged 9–11, 50% female) from three primary schools in England, focusing on their feelings and experiences of autonomy in relation to school-based writing. Thematic analysis, illustrated within Graham's (2018) production strategies for writing, identified three key themes relating to children's perceptions of the locus of control for their writing and the extent to which this was held by, or shared between, the teachers or themselves, with (a) teacher-controlled writing, (b) student-controlled writing and (c) collaboratively-controlled writing themes identified. Children's perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of teacher and student-controlled writing are discussed, before their thoughts on a ‘collaboratively-controlled writing’ approach are shared. This research provides novel and important insights for educators, researchers and policy-makers into how collaboratively-controlled writing projects could enhance primary students' writing motivation, and contributes to current discourse on effective and affecting writing pedagogy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Literacy\",\"volume\":\"59 3\",\"pages\":\"372-384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lit.70011\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lit.70011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lit.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的人关注儿童的写作动机,强调需要更多的研究来强调学生的自主性,并研究课堂实践如何影响学生在写作中的能动性和控制感。本研究采用自我决定理论(SDT)的视角,探讨自主和控制源在小学生写作动机形成中的作用。具体来说,它报告了对来自英国三所小学的24名儿童(9-11岁,50%为女性)的定性访谈研究,重点关注他们在校本写作方面的自主感受和经验。在Graham(2018)的写作生产策略中,主题分析确定了三个关键主题,这些主题与儿童对其写作控制点的看法以及教师或他们自己持有或共享的程度有关,其中(a)教师控制的写作,(b)学生控制的写作和(c)确定的协作控制的写作主题。在分享他们对“协作控制写作”方法的想法之前,讨论了儿童对教师和学生控制写作的优缺点的看法。本研究为教育工作者、研究人员和政策制定者提供了关于协作控制写作项目如何提高小学生写作动机的新颖而重要的见解,并有助于当前关于有效和影响写作教学的论述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘It's healthy. It's good for you’: Children's perspectives on utilising their autonomy in the writing classroom

Growing concern about children's writing motivation highlights the need for more research that foregrounds pupil autonomy and examines how classroom practices influence students' sense of agency and control in their writing. This study adopts a self-determination theory (SDT) perspective to explore the role of autonomy and locus of control in shaping writing motivation among primary-aged students. Specifically, it reports on a qualitative interview study with 24 children (aged 9–11, 50% female) from three primary schools in England, focusing on their feelings and experiences of autonomy in relation to school-based writing. Thematic analysis, illustrated within Graham's (2018) production strategies for writing, identified three key themes relating to children's perceptions of the locus of control for their writing and the extent to which this was held by, or shared between, the teachers or themselves, with (a) teacher-controlled writing, (b) student-controlled writing and (c) collaboratively-controlled writing themes identified. Children's perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of teacher and student-controlled writing are discussed, before their thoughts on a ‘collaboratively-controlled writing’ approach are shared. This research provides novel and important insights for educators, researchers and policy-makers into how collaboratively-controlled writing projects could enhance primary students' writing motivation, and contributes to current discourse on effective and affecting writing pedagogy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy
Literacy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Literacy is the official journal of the United Kingdom Literacy Association (formerly the United Kingdom Reading Association), the professional association for teachers of literacy. Literacy is a refereed journal for those interested in the study and development of literacy. Its readership comprises practitioners, teacher educators, researchers and both undergraduate and graduate students. Literacy offers educators a forum for debate through scrutinising research evidence, reflecting on analysed accounts of innovative practice and examining recent policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信