与常规治疗相比,正念减压能缓解头颈癌患者的抑郁、焦虑和内化耻辱:来自一项随机对照试验的发现

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Zheng Zhang, Qingqin Zhang, Ping Lu, Nurul Izzah Shari, Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar, Mohd Razif Mohamad Yunus, Qiyue Qiu, Fuad Ismail, Nor Faizah Ab Muin, Mohammad Farris Iman Leong Bin Abdullah
{"title":"与常规治疗相比,正念减压能缓解头颈癌患者的抑郁、焦虑和内化耻辱:来自一项随机对照试验的发现","authors":"Zheng Zhang,&nbsp;Qingqin Zhang,&nbsp;Ping Lu,&nbsp;Nurul Izzah Shari,&nbsp;Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar,&nbsp;Mohd Razif Mohamad Yunus,&nbsp;Qiyue Qiu,&nbsp;Fuad Ismail,&nbsp;Nor Faizah Ab Muin,&nbsp;Mohammad Farris Iman Leong Bin Abdullah","doi":"10.1155/da/7499120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> This study aimed to: (1) compare the rates of change in the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms (primary outcomes) as well as internalized stigma and its components (shame with appearance [SWA], speech and social concerns [SSCs], sense of stigma [SS], and regret [R]; secondary outcomes) between the mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) group and the treatment-as-usual (TAU) control group across three timepoints (<i>T</i><sub>0</sub> = baseline assessment, prior to intervention; <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> = postintervention, immediately after completion of intervention or at 8 weeks after commence of intervention; <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> = follow-up assessment, 12 weeks after completion of intervention), and (2) evaluate the mediating effects of reductions in internalized stigma and its components on the relationship between MBSR and the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This multicenter, two-armed, parallel, and double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) recruited 110 HNC patients. All participants were assessed for the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms, and the degrees of internalized stigma and its components, at each timepoint.</p><p><b>Results:</b> MBSR significantly reduced the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms and degrees of internalized stigma and its components across timepoints (<i>T</i><sub>0</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>, and <i>T</i><sub>2</sub>). In contrast, no reduction in scores was observed in the TAU group. Furthermore, internalized stigma, SWA, and SSC partially mediated the relationship between MBSR and the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the changes in the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms and degrees of internalized stigma and its components according to intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis were similar to that of per-protocol (PP) and last observation carry forward (LOCF) analyses.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> MBSR could be recommended as part of the treatment regimen for HNC patients.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06991309</p>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/7499120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Alleviates Depression, Anxiety, and Internalized Stigma Compared With Treatment-as-Usual Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Zheng Zhang,&nbsp;Qingqin Zhang,&nbsp;Ping Lu,&nbsp;Nurul Izzah Shari,&nbsp;Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar,&nbsp;Mohd Razif Mohamad Yunus,&nbsp;Qiyue Qiu,&nbsp;Fuad Ismail,&nbsp;Nor Faizah Ab Muin,&nbsp;Mohammad Farris Iman Leong Bin Abdullah\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/da/7499120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background:</b> This study aimed to: (1) compare the rates of change in the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms (primary outcomes) as well as internalized stigma and its components (shame with appearance [SWA], speech and social concerns [SSCs], sense of stigma [SS], and regret [R]; secondary outcomes) between the mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) group and the treatment-as-usual (TAU) control group across three timepoints (<i>T</i><sub>0</sub> = baseline assessment, prior to intervention; <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> = postintervention, immediately after completion of intervention or at 8 weeks after commence of intervention; <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> = follow-up assessment, 12 weeks after completion of intervention), and (2) evaluate the mediating effects of reductions in internalized stigma and its components on the relationship between MBSR and the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This multicenter, two-armed, parallel, and double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) recruited 110 HNC patients. All participants were assessed for the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms, and the degrees of internalized stigma and its components, at each timepoint.</p><p><b>Results:</b> MBSR significantly reduced the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms and degrees of internalized stigma and its components across timepoints (<i>T</i><sub>0</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>, and <i>T</i><sub>2</sub>). In contrast, no reduction in scores was observed in the TAU group. Furthermore, internalized stigma, SWA, and SSC partially mediated the relationship between MBSR and the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the changes in the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms and degrees of internalized stigma and its components according to intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis were similar to that of per-protocol (PP) and last observation carry forward (LOCF) analyses.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> MBSR could be recommended as part of the treatment regimen for HNC patients.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06991309</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/7499120\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/7499120\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/7499120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在:(1)比较正念减压(MBSR)组和常规治疗(TAU)对照组在三个时间点(T0 =基线评估,干预前)抑郁和焦虑症状(主要结局)以及内化耻感及其组成部分(羞耻伴外表[SWA]、言语和社会关注[ssc]、耻感[SS]和遗憾[R];次要结局)的变化率;T1 =干预后,干预完成后立即或干预开始后8周;T2 =随访评估,干预完成后12周),(2)评估内化污名及其成分减少对正念减压与头颈癌(HNC)患者抑郁、焦虑症状严重程度关系的中介作用。方法:该多中心、双臂、平行、双盲随机对照试验(RCT)招募了110例HNC患者。在每个时间点评估所有参与者的抑郁和焦虑症状的严重程度,以及内化耻辱及其组成部分的程度。结果:正念减压在不同时间点(T0、T1和T2)显著降低抑郁和焦虑症状的严重程度以及内化污名及其成分的程度。相比之下,TAU组未观察到评分降低。此外,内化污名、SWA和SSC在正念减压与抑郁、焦虑症状严重程度的关系中起到部分中介作用。敏感性分析证实,意向治疗(ITT)分析中抑郁和焦虑症状的严重程度、内化污耻感程度及其成分的变化与按方案(PP)和最后观察结转(LOCF)分析相似。结论:正念减压疗法可作为HNC患者治疗方案的一部分。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06991309
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Alleviates Depression, Anxiety, and Internalized Stigma Compared With Treatment-as-Usual Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Alleviates Depression, Anxiety, and Internalized Stigma Compared With Treatment-as-Usual Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: This study aimed to: (1) compare the rates of change in the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms (primary outcomes) as well as internalized stigma and its components (shame with appearance [SWA], speech and social concerns [SSCs], sense of stigma [SS], and regret [R]; secondary outcomes) between the mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) group and the treatment-as-usual (TAU) control group across three timepoints (T0 = baseline assessment, prior to intervention; T1 = postintervention, immediately after completion of intervention or at 8 weeks after commence of intervention; T2 = follow-up assessment, 12 weeks after completion of intervention), and (2) evaluate the mediating effects of reductions in internalized stigma and its components on the relationship between MBSR and the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.

Methods: This multicenter, two-armed, parallel, and double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) recruited 110 HNC patients. All participants were assessed for the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms, and the degrees of internalized stigma and its components, at each timepoint.

Results: MBSR significantly reduced the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms and degrees of internalized stigma and its components across timepoints (T0, T1, and T2). In contrast, no reduction in scores was observed in the TAU group. Furthermore, internalized stigma, SWA, and SSC partially mediated the relationship between MBSR and the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the changes in the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms and degrees of internalized stigma and its components according to intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis were similar to that of per-protocol (PP) and last observation carry forward (LOCF) analyses.

Conclusion: MBSR could be recommended as part of the treatment regimen for HNC patients.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06991309

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信