{"title":"基于性能的设计框架下液化分析的概率评估","authors":"Şahin Çağlar Tuna, Selim Altun","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02230-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil liquefaction during earthquakes poses a persistent challenge in geotechnical engineering, particularly in translating advanced numerical simulations into reliable, performance-based damage predictions. This study presents a novel framework that incorporates the maximum excess pore pressure ratio (PPR_max)—a simulation–derived yet underutilized Engineering Demand Parameter (EDP)—to directly predict liquefaction–induced damage under site–specific seismic loading conditions. Dynamic effective–stress finite element simulations were performed for soft alluvial soils in the seismically active İzmir–Karşıyaka region. Using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, PPR_max thresholds were statistically calibrated against observed damage levels to define transition points between minor and moderate damage. This calibration enabled the derivation of fragility curves linking peak ground acceleration (PGA) to probabilistic damage states within a regional hazard–consistent framework. The study further demonstrates the critical role of liquefiable layer thickness in controlling seismic pore pressure response. Even under identical ground motion intensities, variations in stratigraphy produced significantly different damage outcomes—highlighting a major gap in current seismic codes, which often neglect subsurface variability. The proposed framework enhances the predictive capacity of liquefaction risk assessments by bridging physics–based numerical modeling and empirical damage observations. It provides a scalable foundation for integrating simulation–compatible EDPs into performance–based seismic design and risk mitigation strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 11","pages":"4335 - 4363"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic evaluation of liquefaction analysis in performance based design framework\",\"authors\":\"Şahin Çağlar Tuna, Selim Altun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-025-02230-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soil liquefaction during earthquakes poses a persistent challenge in geotechnical engineering, particularly in translating advanced numerical simulations into reliable, performance-based damage predictions. This study presents a novel framework that incorporates the maximum excess pore pressure ratio (PPR_max)—a simulation–derived yet underutilized Engineering Demand Parameter (EDP)—to directly predict liquefaction–induced damage under site–specific seismic loading conditions. Dynamic effective–stress finite element simulations were performed for soft alluvial soils in the seismically active İzmir–Karşıyaka region. Using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, PPR_max thresholds were statistically calibrated against observed damage levels to define transition points between minor and moderate damage. This calibration enabled the derivation of fragility curves linking peak ground acceleration (PGA) to probabilistic damage states within a regional hazard–consistent framework. The study further demonstrates the critical role of liquefiable layer thickness in controlling seismic pore pressure response. Even under identical ground motion intensities, variations in stratigraphy produced significantly different damage outcomes—highlighting a major gap in current seismic codes, which often neglect subsurface variability. The proposed framework enhances the predictive capacity of liquefaction risk assessments by bridging physics–based numerical modeling and empirical damage observations. It provides a scalable foundation for integrating simulation–compatible EDPs into performance–based seismic design and risk mitigation strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 11\",\"pages\":\"4335 - 4363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02230-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02230-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Probabilistic evaluation of liquefaction analysis in performance based design framework
Soil liquefaction during earthquakes poses a persistent challenge in geotechnical engineering, particularly in translating advanced numerical simulations into reliable, performance-based damage predictions. This study presents a novel framework that incorporates the maximum excess pore pressure ratio (PPR_max)—a simulation–derived yet underutilized Engineering Demand Parameter (EDP)—to directly predict liquefaction–induced damage under site–specific seismic loading conditions. Dynamic effective–stress finite element simulations were performed for soft alluvial soils in the seismically active İzmir–Karşıyaka region. Using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, PPR_max thresholds were statistically calibrated against observed damage levels to define transition points between minor and moderate damage. This calibration enabled the derivation of fragility curves linking peak ground acceleration (PGA) to probabilistic damage states within a regional hazard–consistent framework. The study further demonstrates the critical role of liquefiable layer thickness in controlling seismic pore pressure response. Even under identical ground motion intensities, variations in stratigraphy produced significantly different damage outcomes—highlighting a major gap in current seismic codes, which often neglect subsurface variability. The proposed framework enhances the predictive capacity of liquefaction risk assessments by bridging physics–based numerical modeling and empirical damage observations. It provides a scalable foundation for integrating simulation–compatible EDPs into performance–based seismic design and risk mitigation strategies.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.