{"title":"具有非平行剪力墙的双层钢筋混凝土框架-剪力墙建筑的抗震性能:见解和建议","authors":"Mohammad Yakhkeshi, Payam Tehrani","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02233-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) dual frame-shear wall buildings with nonparallel system irregularities under both far-field and near-field ground motions. Utilizing nonlinear time history analysis and Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA), seven six-story RC models—comprising one regular and six irregular configurations—are analyzed to evaluate collapse capacities, torsional responses, and story drift demands. The findings challenge the classification criteria in ASCE 7–22, revealing that minor wall inclinations (up to ~ 14°) have a negligible impact on collapse capacity, whereas more pronounced inclinations (~26.5°) significantly increase local seismic demands and compromise structural performance. The results suggest that local wall inclinations have a more significant impact on collapse resistance than overall torsional irregularity, highlighting the need for refined regularity classifications that consider localized effects rather than relying solely on global torsional behavior. Although enhanced design strategies improved collapse resistance, they failed to ensure secure performance in highly irregular models, even when fully compliant with seismic code provisions. Near-field ground motions intensified structural vulnerabilities, prompting earlier collapse onset and necessitating stricter criteria for distinguishing between regular and irregular models. These findings underscore the challenges posed by short-duration, high-intensity seismic pulses and the limitations of current design provisions in mitigating their effects. This study emphasizes the need for refined classification criteria and performance-based design improvements to better capture the complex behavior of nonparallel system irregularities, offering critical insights for developing more resilient structural design frameworks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 11","pages":"4831 - 4869"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic performance of dual RC frame-shear wall buildings with nonparallel shear walls: insights and recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Yakhkeshi, Payam Tehrani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-025-02233-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) dual frame-shear wall buildings with nonparallel system irregularities under both far-field and near-field ground motions. Utilizing nonlinear time history analysis and Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA), seven six-story RC models—comprising one regular and six irregular configurations—are analyzed to evaluate collapse capacities, torsional responses, and story drift demands. The findings challenge the classification criteria in ASCE 7–22, revealing that minor wall inclinations (up to ~ 14°) have a negligible impact on collapse capacity, whereas more pronounced inclinations (~26.5°) significantly increase local seismic demands and compromise structural performance. The results suggest that local wall inclinations have a more significant impact on collapse resistance than overall torsional irregularity, highlighting the need for refined regularity classifications that consider localized effects rather than relying solely on global torsional behavior. Although enhanced design strategies improved collapse resistance, they failed to ensure secure performance in highly irregular models, even when fully compliant with seismic code provisions. Near-field ground motions intensified structural vulnerabilities, prompting earlier collapse onset and necessitating stricter criteria for distinguishing between regular and irregular models. These findings underscore the challenges posed by short-duration, high-intensity seismic pulses and the limitations of current design provisions in mitigating their effects. This study emphasizes the need for refined classification criteria and performance-based design improvements to better capture the complex behavior of nonparallel system irregularities, offering critical insights for developing more resilient structural design frameworks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 11\",\"pages\":\"4831 - 4869\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02233-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02233-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Seismic performance of dual RC frame-shear wall buildings with nonparallel shear walls: insights and recommendations
This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) dual frame-shear wall buildings with nonparallel system irregularities under both far-field and near-field ground motions. Utilizing nonlinear time history analysis and Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA), seven six-story RC models—comprising one regular and six irregular configurations—are analyzed to evaluate collapse capacities, torsional responses, and story drift demands. The findings challenge the classification criteria in ASCE 7–22, revealing that minor wall inclinations (up to ~ 14°) have a negligible impact on collapse capacity, whereas more pronounced inclinations (~26.5°) significantly increase local seismic demands and compromise structural performance. The results suggest that local wall inclinations have a more significant impact on collapse resistance than overall torsional irregularity, highlighting the need for refined regularity classifications that consider localized effects rather than relying solely on global torsional behavior. Although enhanced design strategies improved collapse resistance, they failed to ensure secure performance in highly irregular models, even when fully compliant with seismic code provisions. Near-field ground motions intensified structural vulnerabilities, prompting earlier collapse onset and necessitating stricter criteria for distinguishing between regular and irregular models. These findings underscore the challenges posed by short-duration, high-intensity seismic pulses and the limitations of current design provisions in mitigating their effects. This study emphasizes the need for refined classification criteria and performance-based design improvements to better capture the complex behavior of nonparallel system irregularities, offering critical insights for developing more resilient structural design frameworks.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.