Eric G. Lambert, Shanhe Jiang, Jianhong Liu, Monica Solinas-Saunders, Zhan Tuo
{"title":"中国监狱工作人员组织公正与组织信任直接关联路径模型的初步检验","authors":"Eric G. Lambert, Shanhe Jiang, Jianhong Liu, Monica Solinas-Saunders, Zhan Tuo","doi":"10.1007/s11417-025-09457-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Organizational justice refers to the view that the employing organization treats employees in a fair and just manner. There are different schools of thought regarding the number of dimensions that compose organizational justice, but the current study included four: informational, interactional, procedural, and distributive. Organizational trust refers the view that an employee has confidence in the representatives of the organization. The current study included supervisor and management trust, as they are the two major types of organizational trust. The authors propose a path model where informational and interactional justice are positive direct predictors of both procedural and distributive justice, and procedural justice is directly and positively related to distributive justice. In turn, procedural and distributive justice are directly and positively associated with supervisor and management trust. Ordinary least squares analysis of survey data from 322 staff at two Chinese prisons supported the path model, except that procedural justice did not predict supervisor trust. As this is a preliminary study, more research, including more focused research, is needed to determine how organizational justice is related to organizational trust among correctional staff in different nations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45526,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Criminology","volume":"20 3","pages":"219 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Preliminary Test of a Proposed Path Model of the Direct Associations of Organizational Justice’s Relationship with Organizational Trust for Chinese Prison Staff\",\"authors\":\"Eric G. Lambert, Shanhe Jiang, Jianhong Liu, Monica Solinas-Saunders, Zhan Tuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11417-025-09457-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Organizational justice refers to the view that the employing organization treats employees in a fair and just manner. There are different schools of thought regarding the number of dimensions that compose organizational justice, but the current study included four: informational, interactional, procedural, and distributive. Organizational trust refers the view that an employee has confidence in the representatives of the organization. The current study included supervisor and management trust, as they are the two major types of organizational trust. The authors propose a path model where informational and interactional justice are positive direct predictors of both procedural and distributive justice, and procedural justice is directly and positively related to distributive justice. In turn, procedural and distributive justice are directly and positively associated with supervisor and management trust. Ordinary least squares analysis of survey data from 322 staff at two Chinese prisons supported the path model, except that procedural justice did not predict supervisor trust. As this is a preliminary study, more research, including more focused research, is needed to determine how organizational justice is related to organizational trust among correctional staff in different nations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Criminology\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"219 - 240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11417-025-09457-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11417-025-09457-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Preliminary Test of a Proposed Path Model of the Direct Associations of Organizational Justice’s Relationship with Organizational Trust for Chinese Prison Staff
Organizational justice refers to the view that the employing organization treats employees in a fair and just manner. There are different schools of thought regarding the number of dimensions that compose organizational justice, but the current study included four: informational, interactional, procedural, and distributive. Organizational trust refers the view that an employee has confidence in the representatives of the organization. The current study included supervisor and management trust, as they are the two major types of organizational trust. The authors propose a path model where informational and interactional justice are positive direct predictors of both procedural and distributive justice, and procedural justice is directly and positively related to distributive justice. In turn, procedural and distributive justice are directly and positively associated with supervisor and management trust. Ordinary least squares analysis of survey data from 322 staff at two Chinese prisons supported the path model, except that procedural justice did not predict supervisor trust. As this is a preliminary study, more research, including more focused research, is needed to determine how organizational justice is related to organizational trust among correctional staff in different nations.
期刊介绍:
Electronic submission now possible! Please see the Instructions for Authors. For general information about this new journal please contact the publisher at [welmoed.spahr@springer.com] The Asian Journal of Criminology aims to advance the study of criminology and criminal justice in Asia, to promote evidence-based public policy in crime prevention, and to promote comparative studies about crime and criminal justice. The Journal provides a platform for criminologists, policymakers, and practitioners and welcomes manuscripts relating to crime, crime prevention, criminal law, medico-legal topics and the administration of criminal justice in Asian countries. The Journal especially encourages theoretical and methodological papers with an emphasis on evidence-based, empirical research addressing crime in Asian contexts. It seeks to publish research arising from a broad variety of methodological traditions, including quantitative, qualitative, historical, and comparative methods. The Journal fosters a multi-disciplinary focus and welcomes manuscripts from a variety of disciplines, including criminology, criminal justice, law, sociology, psychology, forensic science, social work, urban studies, history, and geography.