中国监狱工作人员组织公正与组织信任直接关联路径模型的初步检验

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Eric G. Lambert, Shanhe Jiang, Jianhong Liu, Monica Solinas-Saunders, Zhan Tuo
{"title":"中国监狱工作人员组织公正与组织信任直接关联路径模型的初步检验","authors":"Eric G. Lambert,&nbsp;Shanhe Jiang,&nbsp;Jianhong Liu,&nbsp;Monica Solinas-Saunders,&nbsp;Zhan Tuo","doi":"10.1007/s11417-025-09457-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Organizational justice refers to the view that the employing organization treats employees in a fair and just manner. There are different schools of thought regarding the number of dimensions that compose organizational justice, but the current study included four: informational, interactional, procedural, and distributive. Organizational trust refers the view that an employee has confidence in the representatives of the organization. The current study included supervisor and management trust, as they are the two major types of organizational trust. The authors propose a path model where informational and interactional justice are positive direct predictors of both procedural and distributive justice, and procedural justice is directly and positively related to distributive justice. In turn, procedural and distributive justice are directly and positively associated with supervisor and management trust. Ordinary least squares analysis of survey data from 322 staff at two Chinese prisons supported the path model, except that procedural justice did not predict supervisor trust. As this is a preliminary study, more research, including more focused research, is needed to determine how organizational justice is related to organizational trust among correctional staff in different nations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45526,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Criminology","volume":"20 3","pages":"219 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Preliminary Test of a Proposed Path Model of the Direct Associations of Organizational Justice’s Relationship with Organizational Trust for Chinese Prison Staff\",\"authors\":\"Eric G. Lambert,&nbsp;Shanhe Jiang,&nbsp;Jianhong Liu,&nbsp;Monica Solinas-Saunders,&nbsp;Zhan Tuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11417-025-09457-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Organizational justice refers to the view that the employing organization treats employees in a fair and just manner. There are different schools of thought regarding the number of dimensions that compose organizational justice, but the current study included four: informational, interactional, procedural, and distributive. Organizational trust refers the view that an employee has confidence in the representatives of the organization. The current study included supervisor and management trust, as they are the two major types of organizational trust. The authors propose a path model where informational and interactional justice are positive direct predictors of both procedural and distributive justice, and procedural justice is directly and positively related to distributive justice. In turn, procedural and distributive justice are directly and positively associated with supervisor and management trust. Ordinary least squares analysis of survey data from 322 staff at two Chinese prisons supported the path model, except that procedural justice did not predict supervisor trust. As this is a preliminary study, more research, including more focused research, is needed to determine how organizational justice is related to organizational trust among correctional staff in different nations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Criminology\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"219 - 240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11417-025-09457-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11417-025-09457-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

组织公正是指用人单位以公平公正的方式对待员工的观点。关于构成组织公正的维度数量,有不同的思想流派,但目前的研究包括四个:信息、互动、程序和分配。组织信任是指员工对组织代表的信任。目前的研究包括主管信任和管理信任,因为它们是组织信任的两种主要类型。作者提出了一个路径模型,其中信息正义和互动正义是程序正义和分配正义的积极直接预测因子,程序正义与分配正义直接和积极相关。反过来,程序公正和分配公正与监督者和管理者的信任直接和积极相关。对中国两所监狱322名工作人员的调查数据进行的普通最小二乘分析支持路径模型,但程序正义不能预测主管信任。由于这是一项初步研究,需要更多的研究,包括更有针对性的研究,以确定不同国家的惩教人员组织公正与组织信任之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Preliminary Test of a Proposed Path Model of the Direct Associations of Organizational Justice’s Relationship with Organizational Trust for Chinese Prison Staff

A Preliminary Test of a Proposed Path Model of the Direct Associations of Organizational Justice’s Relationship with Organizational Trust for Chinese Prison Staff

A Preliminary Test of a Proposed Path Model of the Direct Associations of Organizational Justice’s Relationship with Organizational Trust for Chinese Prison Staff

Organizational justice refers to the view that the employing organization treats employees in a fair and just manner. There are different schools of thought regarding the number of dimensions that compose organizational justice, but the current study included four: informational, interactional, procedural, and distributive. Organizational trust refers the view that an employee has confidence in the representatives of the organization. The current study included supervisor and management trust, as they are the two major types of organizational trust. The authors propose a path model where informational and interactional justice are positive direct predictors of both procedural and distributive justice, and procedural justice is directly and positively related to distributive justice. In turn, procedural and distributive justice are directly and positively associated with supervisor and management trust. Ordinary least squares analysis of survey data from 322 staff at two Chinese prisons supported the path model, except that procedural justice did not predict supervisor trust. As this is a preliminary study, more research, including more focused research, is needed to determine how organizational justice is related to organizational trust among correctional staff in different nations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Criminology
Asian Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Electronic submission now possible! Please see the Instructions for Authors. For general information about this new journal please contact the publisher at [welmoed.spahr@springer.com] The Asian Journal of Criminology aims to advance the study of criminology and criminal justice in Asia, to promote evidence-based public policy in crime prevention, and to promote comparative studies about crime and criminal justice. The Journal provides a platform for criminologists, policymakers, and practitioners and welcomes manuscripts relating to crime, crime prevention, criminal law, medico-legal topics and the administration of criminal justice in Asian countries. The Journal especially encourages theoretical and methodological papers with an emphasis on evidence-based, empirical research addressing crime in Asian contexts. It seeks to publish research arising from a broad variety of methodological traditions, including quantitative, qualitative, historical, and comparative methods. The Journal fosters a multi-disciplinary focus and welcomes manuscripts from a variety of disciplines, including criminology, criminal justice, law, sociology, psychology, forensic science, social work, urban studies, history, and geography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信