基于固定效应、混合效应回归和贝叶斯推断的NGA-West2水平地面运动经验模型修正

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Kenneth W. Campbell, Yousef Bozorgnia, Nicolas M. Kuehn
{"title":"基于固定效应、混合效应回归和贝叶斯推断的NGA-West2水平地面运动经验模型修正","authors":"Kenneth W. Campbell,&nbsp;Yousef Bozorgnia,&nbsp;Nicolas M. Kuehn","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02218-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents a revision of empirical ground-motion models (GMMs) for the horizontal components of 5%-damped pseudo-spectral acceleration, peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, cumulative absolute velocity, and Arias intensity that were originally developed by the first two authors as part of the NGA-West2 Program. The GMMs were refit using fixed-effects (i.e., no random effects) and mixed-effects regression analyses that include either (1) events as a random or repeatable effect or (2) both events and sites as random or repeatable effects. True estimates of the variance components were obtained using Bayesian inference that incorporates uncertainty in the random effects and within-group errors (i.e., the residuals). As a result, the aleatory standard deviations are larger than those calculated directly from the residuals that ignore this uncertainty. Goodness-of-fit metrics show that the GMMs were improved by adding events as a random effect and improved even further by adding sites as a random effect. We found the variance components other than the between-site standard deviation to be magnitude dependent. We recommend use of the GMM that includes both events and sites as random effects because of its appropriate modeling of repeatable effects and its superior goodness-of-fit metrics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 11","pages":"4305 - 4334"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revision of empirical NGA-West2 horizontal ground-motion models using fixed-effects and mixed-effects regression and Bayesian inference\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth W. Campbell,&nbsp;Yousef Bozorgnia,&nbsp;Nicolas M. Kuehn\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-025-02218-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article presents a revision of empirical ground-motion models (GMMs) for the horizontal components of 5%-damped pseudo-spectral acceleration, peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, cumulative absolute velocity, and Arias intensity that were originally developed by the first two authors as part of the NGA-West2 Program. The GMMs were refit using fixed-effects (i.e., no random effects) and mixed-effects regression analyses that include either (1) events as a random or repeatable effect or (2) both events and sites as random or repeatable effects. True estimates of the variance components were obtained using Bayesian inference that incorporates uncertainty in the random effects and within-group errors (i.e., the residuals). As a result, the aleatory standard deviations are larger than those calculated directly from the residuals that ignore this uncertainty. Goodness-of-fit metrics show that the GMMs were improved by adding events as a random effect and improved even further by adding sites as a random effect. We found the variance components other than the between-site standard deviation to be magnitude dependent. We recommend use of the GMM that includes both events and sites as random effects because of its appropriate modeling of repeatable effects and its superior goodness-of-fit metrics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 11\",\"pages\":\"4305 - 4334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02218-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02218-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对前两位作者在NGA-West2项目中开发的5%阻尼伪谱加速度、峰值地面加速度、峰值地面速度、累积绝对速度和Arias强度水平分量的经验地动模型(GMMs)进行了修正。使用固定效应(即无随机效应)和混合效应回归分析对gmm进行修正,其中包括:(1)事件作为随机或可重复的效应,或(2)事件和地点都是随机或可重复的效应。使用贝叶斯推理获得方差成分的真实估计,该推断包含随机效应和组内误差(即残差)中的不确定性。因此,选择性标准偏差大于直接从忽略这种不确定性的残差计算出来的标准差。拟合优度指标表明,将事件作为随机效应添加到gmm中可以得到改善,将地点作为随机效应添加到gmm中可以得到进一步改善。我们发现,除了站点间标准偏差之外,方差成分与量值有关。我们建议使用包括事件和地点作为随机效应的GMM,因为它对可重复效应进行了适当的建模,并且具有优越的拟合优度指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revision of empirical NGA-West2 horizontal ground-motion models using fixed-effects and mixed-effects regression and Bayesian inference

This article presents a revision of empirical ground-motion models (GMMs) for the horizontal components of 5%-damped pseudo-spectral acceleration, peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, cumulative absolute velocity, and Arias intensity that were originally developed by the first two authors as part of the NGA-West2 Program. The GMMs were refit using fixed-effects (i.e., no random effects) and mixed-effects regression analyses that include either (1) events as a random or repeatable effect or (2) both events and sites as random or repeatable effects. True estimates of the variance components were obtained using Bayesian inference that incorporates uncertainty in the random effects and within-group errors (i.e., the residuals). As a result, the aleatory standard deviations are larger than those calculated directly from the residuals that ignore this uncertainty. Goodness-of-fit metrics show that the GMMs were improved by adding events as a random effect and improved even further by adding sites as a random effect. We found the variance components other than the between-site standard deviation to be magnitude dependent. We recommend use of the GMM that includes both events and sites as random effects because of its appropriate modeling of repeatable effects and its superior goodness-of-fit metrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信