抗草甘膦玉米(CC-2)在大鼠体内的相对安全性

Anyi Liu,Xueqian Yin,Jing Wen,Chao Hou,Ruoyu Zhou,Xinran Liu,Ning Yin,Yuanzhi Jian,Shan Liu,Xiaoxuan Zhang,Junbo Wang
{"title":"抗草甘膦玉米(CC-2)在大鼠体内的相对安全性","authors":"Anyi Liu,Xueqian Yin,Jing Wen,Chao Hou,Ruoyu Zhou,Xinran Liu,Ning Yin,Yuanzhi Jian,Shan Liu,Xiaoxuan Zhang,Junbo Wang","doi":"10.1080/21645698.2025.2550820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rapid adoption of glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops by farmers, the food safety has garnered significant attention. This study aims to evaluate the relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2). Rats were divided into three groups: one group receiving AIN-93 G feed (AIN), one receiving non-modified receptor maize feed (NM), and the other receiving CC-2 maize feed (GM). The intervention spanned from gestation d 0 of the parental rats to 90 d post-weaning of the offspring. The results indicated no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes, body weight, growth monitoring, behavioral tests, or organ indexes between the GM group and the two control groups (AIN and NM). Although there were significant differences in some hematological parameters, serum chemistry, and organ weights, histopathological analysis revealed no abnormalities. No exogenous gene fragments were detected in major organs. In conclusion, CC-2 maize is relative safe for growth and development in rats.","PeriodicalId":501763,"journal":{"name":"GM Crops & Food","volume":"29 1","pages":"591-606"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2) in rats.\",\"authors\":\"Anyi Liu,Xueqian Yin,Jing Wen,Chao Hou,Ruoyu Zhou,Xinran Liu,Ning Yin,Yuanzhi Jian,Shan Liu,Xiaoxuan Zhang,Junbo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21645698.2025.2550820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the rapid adoption of glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops by farmers, the food safety has garnered significant attention. This study aims to evaluate the relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2). Rats were divided into three groups: one group receiving AIN-93 G feed (AIN), one receiving non-modified receptor maize feed (NM), and the other receiving CC-2 maize feed (GM). The intervention spanned from gestation d 0 of the parental rats to 90 d post-weaning of the offspring. The results indicated no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes, body weight, growth monitoring, behavioral tests, or organ indexes between the GM group and the two control groups (AIN and NM). Although there were significant differences in some hematological parameters, serum chemistry, and organ weights, histopathological analysis revealed no abnormalities. No exogenous gene fragments were detected in major organs. In conclusion, CC-2 maize is relative safe for growth and development in rats.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GM Crops & Food\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"591-606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GM Crops & Food\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2025.2550820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GM Crops & Food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2025.2550820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着抗草甘膦作物的快速种植,食品安全问题引起了人们的广泛关注。本研究旨在评价抗草甘膦玉米(CC-2)的相对安全性。将大鼠分为3组,分别饲喂AIN-93 G饲料(AIN)、非改性受体玉米饲料(NM)和CC-2玉米饲料(GM)。干预时间从亲代大鼠妊娠期至后代断奶后90天。结果显示GM组和两个对照组(AIN和NM)在妊娠结局、体重、生长监测、行为测试或器官指数方面无显著差异。虽然在某些血液学参数、血清化学和器官重量方面存在显著差异,但组织病理学分析未发现异常。主要脏器未检出外源基因片段。综上所述,CC-2玉米对大鼠的生长发育是相对安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2) in rats.
With the rapid adoption of glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops by farmers, the food safety has garnered significant attention. This study aims to evaluate the relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2). Rats were divided into three groups: one group receiving AIN-93 G feed (AIN), one receiving non-modified receptor maize feed (NM), and the other receiving CC-2 maize feed (GM). The intervention spanned from gestation d 0 of the parental rats to 90 d post-weaning of the offspring. The results indicated no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes, body weight, growth monitoring, behavioral tests, or organ indexes between the GM group and the two control groups (AIN and NM). Although there were significant differences in some hematological parameters, serum chemistry, and organ weights, histopathological analysis revealed no abnormalities. No exogenous gene fragments were detected in major organs. In conclusion, CC-2 maize is relative safe for growth and development in rats.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信