{"title":"池淤改良、综合营养管理和生物肥料对半干旱Alfisols农艺生产力的影响","authors":"Sumanta Kundu, Cherukumalli Srinivasarao, Rambilash Mallick, Jasti Venkata Naga Satya Prasad, Ashok Kumar Indoria, Venati Girija Veni, Gudapati Pratibha, Chokkakula Chandra Sekhar, Pravin Bhika Thakur, Kondru Venkateswara Rao, Mathyam Prabhakar, Kotha Sammi Reddy, Vinod Kumar Singh","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The harsh climate, land degradation, and poor resources are the principal causes of low productivity in the rainfed areas. A field experiment was conducted during the rainy and winter seasons of 2010–2015 (6 years) on maize‐horsegram cropping sequence to study the effect of soil amendment with tank silt, integrated use of chemical fertilizers and organic manure, and biofertilizers application on productivity, profitability, and changes in soil properties in degraded Alfisols of southern India. A total of 12 treatments were applied viz., <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>1</jats:sub> = Control, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>2</jats:sub> = Recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>3</jats:sub> = 75% RDF + Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) + Azotobacter (AZ), <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>4</jats:sub> = 75% RDF + Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 5 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>5</jats:sub> = 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> + PSB + AZ, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>6</jats:sub> = 75% RDF + Tank Silt 30 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> (Once in 3 years), <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>7</jats:sub> = 75% RDF + Tank Silt 30 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> + PSB + AZ, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>8</jats:sub> = 50% RDF + PSB + AZ, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>9</jats:sub> = 50% RDF + FYM @ 5 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>10</jats:sub> = 50% RDF + FYM @ 5 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> + PSB + AZ, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>11</jats:sub> = 50% RDF + Tank Silt 30 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>12</jats:sub> = 50% RDF + Tank Silt 30 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ PSB + AZ. Significantly higher system yield (Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) was observed in 75% RDF + tank silt + PSB + AZ (5.5) and 75% RDF + FYM + PSB + AZ (5.4) treatments compared to control and RDF. The performance of the maize crop during the rainy season, especially in the years with a higher number of dry spells, was better in the tank silt applied plots compared to the plots without tank silt application. The average maize yields under 75% RDF + tank silt + PSB + AZ were higher than the treatments 75% RDF + PSB + AZ and 75% RDF + FYM + PSB + AZ by 17.5% and 4.4%, respectively. Significantly higher uptake of N (100.9 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), P (32.0 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), and K (119.8 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) in maize was found in 75% RDF + tank silt + PSB + AZ. Higher crop response ratio (CRR) was recorded in 50% RDF + tank silt with biofertilizers treatment (31.19 kg yield kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> nutrient applied). Higher partial factor productivity for NPK (PFPf) was observed in 50% RDF + tank silt with or without biofertilizers treatments (40.7 kg yield kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> fertilizer nutrients applied). Significantly higher gross return (₹49,535 ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), net return (₹32,519 ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and B:C ratio (2.91) were observed in 75% RDF + FYM + PSB + AZ, which were very closely followed by 75% RDF + tank silt + PSB + AZ with ₹49,478 ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, ₹32,212 ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and 2.87, respectively. Addition of tank silt once in 3 years not only increased the soil available N, P, K contents (with maximum contents of 163, 19.9, and 173 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, respectively) under 50% RDF + tank silt with or without biofertilizers, but also increased their availability to plants, which was reflected in nutrient uptake by maize. Thus, tank silt soil amendment can be a viable option to improve system productivity in light‐textured poor soils of semiarid tropics.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Tank Silt Amendment, Integrated Nutrient Management, and Biofertilizers on Agronomic Productivity of Semi‐Arid Alfisols\",\"authors\":\"Sumanta Kundu, Cherukumalli Srinivasarao, Rambilash Mallick, Jasti Venkata Naga Satya Prasad, Ashok Kumar Indoria, Venati Girija Veni, Gudapati Pratibha, Chokkakula Chandra Sekhar, Pravin Bhika Thakur, Kondru Venkateswara Rao, Mathyam Prabhakar, Kotha Sammi Reddy, Vinod Kumar Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ldr.70191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The harsh climate, land degradation, and poor resources are the principal causes of low productivity in the rainfed areas. A field experiment was conducted during the rainy and winter seasons of 2010–2015 (6 years) on maize‐horsegram cropping sequence to study the effect of soil amendment with tank silt, integrated use of chemical fertilizers and organic manure, and biofertilizers application on productivity, profitability, and changes in soil properties in degraded Alfisols of southern India. A total of 12 treatments were applied viz., <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>1</jats:sub> = Control, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>2</jats:sub> = Recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>3</jats:sub> = 75% RDF + Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) + Azotobacter (AZ), <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>4</jats:sub> = 75% RDF + Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 5 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>5</jats:sub> = 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> + PSB + AZ, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>6</jats:sub> = 75% RDF + Tank Silt 30 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> (Once in 3 years), <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>7</jats:sub> = 75% RDF + Tank Silt 30 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> + PSB + AZ, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>8</jats:sub> = 50% RDF + PSB + AZ, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>9</jats:sub> = 50% RDF + FYM @ 5 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>10</jats:sub> = 50% RDF + FYM @ 5 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> + PSB + AZ, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>11</jats:sub> = 50% RDF + Tank Silt 30 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub>12</jats:sub> = 50% RDF + Tank Silt 30 Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>+ PSB + AZ. Significantly higher system yield (Mg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) was observed in 75% RDF + tank silt + PSB + AZ (5.5) and 75% RDF + FYM + PSB + AZ (5.4) treatments compared to control and RDF. The performance of the maize crop during the rainy season, especially in the years with a higher number of dry spells, was better in the tank silt applied plots compared to the plots without tank silt application. The average maize yields under 75% RDF + tank silt + PSB + AZ were higher than the treatments 75% RDF + PSB + AZ and 75% RDF + FYM + PSB + AZ by 17.5% and 4.4%, respectively. Significantly higher uptake of N (100.9 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), P (32.0 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), and K (119.8 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) in maize was found in 75% RDF + tank silt + PSB + AZ. Higher crop response ratio (CRR) was recorded in 50% RDF + tank silt with biofertilizers treatment (31.19 kg yield kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> nutrient applied). Higher partial factor productivity for NPK (PFPf) was observed in 50% RDF + tank silt with or without biofertilizers treatments (40.7 kg yield kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> fertilizer nutrients applied). Significantly higher gross return (₹49,535 ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>), net return (₹32,519 ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and B:C ratio (2.91) were observed in 75% RDF + FYM + PSB + AZ, which were very closely followed by 75% RDF + tank silt + PSB + AZ with ₹49,478 ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, ₹32,212 ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and 2.87, respectively. Addition of tank silt once in 3 years not only increased the soil available N, P, K contents (with maximum contents of 163, 19.9, and 173 kg ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, respectively) under 50% RDF + tank silt with or without biofertilizers, but also increased their availability to plants, which was reflected in nutrient uptake by maize. Thus, tank silt soil amendment can be a viable option to improve system productivity in light‐textured poor soils of semiarid tropics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Degradation & Development\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Degradation & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70191\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
恶劣的气候、土地退化和资源贫乏是造成雨养地区生产力低下的主要原因。在2010-2015年(6年)的雨季和冬季,对印度南部退化的Alfisols进行了玉米-马克兰种植序列的田间试验,研究了槽淤泥土壤改良剂、化肥和有机肥综合施用以及生物肥料施用对生产力、盈利能力和土壤性质变化的影响。总共有12治疗应用即T1 =控制,T2 =推荐剂量的肥料(RDF), T3 = 75%磷酸RDF +增溶的细菌(公安局)+固氮菌(AZ), T4 = 75% RDF +农场院子肥料(施厩肥)@ 5毫克ha−1,T5 = 75% RDF +施厩肥@ 5毫克哈−1 +公安局+ AZ, T6 = 75% RDF +坦克淤泥30毫克公顷−1(3年一次),T7 = 75% RDF +坦克淤泥30毫克哈−1 +公安局+ AZ, T8 = 50% RDF +公安局+ AZ, T9 = 50% RDF +施厩肥@ 5毫克公顷−1,T10 = 50% RDF +施厩肥@ 5毫克ha−1 +公安局+阿兹,T11 = 50% RDF +槽淤泥30 Mg ha - 1, T12 = 50% RDF +槽淤泥30 Mg ha - 1+ PSB + AZ。75% RDF +槽淤泥+ PSB + AZ(5.5)和75% RDF + FYM + PSB + AZ(5.4)处理的系统产量(Mg ha - 1)显著高于对照和RDF。玉米作物在雨季,特别是干旱年份,施用淤泥的地块比未施用淤泥的地块表现更好。75% RDF +淤泥+ PSB + AZ处理的玉米平均产量比75% RDF + PSB + AZ和75% RDF + FYM + PSB + AZ处理分别提高17.5%和4.4%。75% RDF +槽淤泥+ PSB + AZ处理的玉米对N (100.9 kg ha - 1)、P (32.0 kg ha - 1)和K (119.8 kg ha - 1)的吸收量显著增加。50% RDF +槽淤泥加生物肥料处理的作物响应比(CRR)更高(施用31.19 kg产量kg - 1)。在50% RDF +槽淤泥中,无论是否施用生物肥料,氮磷钾的部分因子生产率均较高(每千克- 1肥料施量为40.7千克)。75% RDF + FYM + PSB + AZ的总收益(49,535 ha - 1),净收益(32,519 ha - 1)和B:C比率(2.91)显著较高,紧随其后的是75% RDF +罐淤泥+ PSB + AZ,分别为49,478 ha - 1, 32,212 ha - 1和2.87。每3年加施1次污泥,在添加或不添加生物肥料的50% RDF +污泥条件下,不仅提高了土壤有效氮、磷、钾含量(最大含量分别为163、19.9和173 kg ha - 1),而且提高了它们对植物的有效性,这体现在玉米对养分的吸收上。因此,在半干旱热带轻质贫瘠土壤中,淤泥土壤改良剂是提高系统生产力的可行选择。
Effect of Tank Silt Amendment, Integrated Nutrient Management, and Biofertilizers on Agronomic Productivity of Semi‐Arid Alfisols
The harsh climate, land degradation, and poor resources are the principal causes of low productivity in the rainfed areas. A field experiment was conducted during the rainy and winter seasons of 2010–2015 (6 years) on maize‐horsegram cropping sequence to study the effect of soil amendment with tank silt, integrated use of chemical fertilizers and organic manure, and biofertilizers application on productivity, profitability, and changes in soil properties in degraded Alfisols of southern India. A total of 12 treatments were applied viz., T1 = Control, T2 = Recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), T3 = 75% RDF + Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) + Azotobacter (AZ), T4 = 75% RDF + Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 5 Mg ha−1, T5 = 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 Mg ha−1 + PSB + AZ, T6 = 75% RDF + Tank Silt 30 Mg ha−1 (Once in 3 years), T7 = 75% RDF + Tank Silt 30 Mg ha−1 + PSB + AZ, T8 = 50% RDF + PSB + AZ, T9 = 50% RDF + FYM @ 5 Mg ha−1, T10 = 50% RDF + FYM @ 5 Mg ha−1 + PSB + AZ, T11 = 50% RDF + Tank Silt 30 Mg ha−1, T12 = 50% RDF + Tank Silt 30 Mg ha−1+ PSB + AZ. Significantly higher system yield (Mg ha−1) was observed in 75% RDF + tank silt + PSB + AZ (5.5) and 75% RDF + FYM + PSB + AZ (5.4) treatments compared to control and RDF. The performance of the maize crop during the rainy season, especially in the years with a higher number of dry spells, was better in the tank silt applied plots compared to the plots without tank silt application. The average maize yields under 75% RDF + tank silt + PSB + AZ were higher than the treatments 75% RDF + PSB + AZ and 75% RDF + FYM + PSB + AZ by 17.5% and 4.4%, respectively. Significantly higher uptake of N (100.9 kg ha−1), P (32.0 kg ha−1), and K (119.8 kg ha−1) in maize was found in 75% RDF + tank silt + PSB + AZ. Higher crop response ratio (CRR) was recorded in 50% RDF + tank silt with biofertilizers treatment (31.19 kg yield kg−1 nutrient applied). Higher partial factor productivity for NPK (PFPf) was observed in 50% RDF + tank silt with or without biofertilizers treatments (40.7 kg yield kg−1 fertilizer nutrients applied). Significantly higher gross return (₹49,535 ha−1), net return (₹32,519 ha−1) and B:C ratio (2.91) were observed in 75% RDF + FYM + PSB + AZ, which were very closely followed by 75% RDF + tank silt + PSB + AZ with ₹49,478 ha−1, ₹32,212 ha−1 and 2.87, respectively. Addition of tank silt once in 3 years not only increased the soil available N, P, K contents (with maximum contents of 163, 19.9, and 173 kg ha−1, respectively) under 50% RDF + tank silt with or without biofertilizers, but also increased their availability to plants, which was reflected in nutrient uptake by maize. Thus, tank silt soil amendment can be a viable option to improve system productivity in light‐textured poor soils of semiarid tropics.
期刊介绍:
Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on:
- what land degradation is;
- what causes land degradation;
- the impacts of land degradation
- the scale of land degradation;
- the history, current status or future trends of land degradation;
- avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation;
- remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land;
- sustainable land management.