Gabriel Molineros, Eyal Atias, Itamar Tamir, Alexander Klimov, Ofer Gofrit, Vladimir Yutkin, Guy Hidas, Mordechai Duvdevani, Alan Bloom
{"title":"[前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗留置导尿管脱机]。","authors":"Gabriel Molineros, Eyal Atias, Itamar Tamir, Alexander Klimov, Ofer Gofrit, Vladimir Yutkin, Guy Hidas, Mordechai Duvdevani, Alan Bloom","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is common in men over 50 years of age and often causes urinary tract obstruction, which can lead to urinary retention and reliance on a permanent catheter. In cases where medical treatment fails or it is contraindicated, surgical treatment is recommended. This study explored an alternative: prostatic artery embolization (PAE), evaluating its effectiveness in weaning patients off a catheter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, data was collected on patients who underwent PAE at our institution, by the same physician, from August 2018 to November 2023, to treat persistent urinary retention or had contraindications to catheter weaning. A statistical analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 115 patients underwent PAE, 29 patients for weaning off a catheter. Their average age was 73.4 years (SD - 10.19). The average prostate volume was 167.44 grams (SD - 85.4). The majority, 62%, had significant comorbidities (ASA of 3-4). After PAE, 28 patients (97%) weaned off the catheter. The side effects were mostly mild (17%) with a Clavien-Dindo score of 1 to 2 and resolved spontaneously. More serious side effects were observed in two patients and included partial necrosis of the glans penis and renal failure. Both side effects resolved completely during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PAE is a good solution for weaning off a urethral catheter in patients with significant comorbidities. This procedure has a high success rate in catheter weaning and mostly mild and transient side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":101459,"journal":{"name":"Harefuah","volume":"164 8","pages":"488-491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[PROSTATE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION FOR WEANING OF INDWELLING URINARY CATHETER].\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Molineros, Eyal Atias, Itamar Tamir, Alexander Klimov, Ofer Gofrit, Vladimir Yutkin, Guy Hidas, Mordechai Duvdevani, Alan Bloom\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is common in men over 50 years of age and often causes urinary tract obstruction, which can lead to urinary retention and reliance on a permanent catheter. In cases where medical treatment fails or it is contraindicated, surgical treatment is recommended. This study explored an alternative: prostatic artery embolization (PAE), evaluating its effectiveness in weaning patients off a catheter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, data was collected on patients who underwent PAE at our institution, by the same physician, from August 2018 to November 2023, to treat persistent urinary retention or had contraindications to catheter weaning. A statistical analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 115 patients underwent PAE, 29 patients for weaning off a catheter. Their average age was 73.4 years (SD - 10.19). The average prostate volume was 167.44 grams (SD - 85.4). The majority, 62%, had significant comorbidities (ASA of 3-4). After PAE, 28 patients (97%) weaned off the catheter. The side effects were mostly mild (17%) with a Clavien-Dindo score of 1 to 2 and resolved spontaneously. More serious side effects were observed in two patients and included partial necrosis of the glans penis and renal failure. Both side effects resolved completely during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PAE is a good solution for weaning off a urethral catheter in patients with significant comorbidities. This procedure has a high success rate in catheter weaning and mostly mild and transient side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harefuah\",\"volume\":\"164 8\",\"pages\":\"488-491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harefuah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harefuah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:良性前列腺增生(BPH)常见于50岁以上的男性,常引起尿路阻塞,导致尿潴留和依赖永久导尿管。在药物治疗失败或有禁忌的情况下,建议手术治疗。本研究探索了一种替代方案:前列腺动脉栓塞(PAE),评估其在脱离导管患者中的有效性。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,收集了2018年8月至2023年11月由同一名医生在我院接受PAE治疗持续性尿潴留或有导管脱落禁忌症的患者的数据。进行了统计分析。结果:115例患者接受了PAE治疗,29例患者脱离了导管。平均年龄73.4岁(SD - 10.19)。前列腺平均体积为167.44 g (SD - 85.4)。大多数患者(62%)有明显的合并症(ASA为3-4)。经PAE后,28例患者(97%)脱离导管。副作用大多轻微(17%),Clavien-Dindo评分为1 ~ 2,自行消退。在两例患者中观察到更严重的副作用,包括阴茎龟头部分坏死和肾功能衰竭。两种副作用均在随访中完全消除。结论:对于有明显合并症的患者,PAE是一种较好的方法。该方法拔管成功率高,副作用轻且短暂。
[PROSTATE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION FOR WEANING OF INDWELLING URINARY CATHETER].
Introduction: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is common in men over 50 years of age and often causes urinary tract obstruction, which can lead to urinary retention and reliance on a permanent catheter. In cases where medical treatment fails or it is contraindicated, surgical treatment is recommended. This study explored an alternative: prostatic artery embolization (PAE), evaluating its effectiveness in weaning patients off a catheter.
Methods: In this retrospective study, data was collected on patients who underwent PAE at our institution, by the same physician, from August 2018 to November 2023, to treat persistent urinary retention or had contraindications to catheter weaning. A statistical analysis was conducted.
Results: A total of 115 patients underwent PAE, 29 patients for weaning off a catheter. Their average age was 73.4 years (SD - 10.19). The average prostate volume was 167.44 grams (SD - 85.4). The majority, 62%, had significant comorbidities (ASA of 3-4). After PAE, 28 patients (97%) weaned off the catheter. The side effects were mostly mild (17%) with a Clavien-Dindo score of 1 to 2 and resolved spontaneously. More serious side effects were observed in two patients and included partial necrosis of the glans penis and renal failure. Both side effects resolved completely during follow-up.
Conclusions: PAE is a good solution for weaning off a urethral catheter in patients with significant comorbidities. This procedure has a high success rate in catheter weaning and mostly mild and transient side effects.