有或无功能性语音障碍的说话者频率和强度的意志控制。

IF 2.2
Mara R Kapsner-Smith, Juli Rosenzweig, Haley Wilcox, Neel Bhatt, J P Giliberto, Ludo Max, Tanya L Eadie, Cara E Stepp
{"title":"有或无功能性语音障碍的说话者频率和强度的意志控制。","authors":"Mara R Kapsner-Smith, Juli Rosenzweig, Haley Wilcox, Neel Bhatt, J P Giliberto, Ludo Max, Tanya L Eadie, Cara E Stepp","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prior studies of vocal auditory-motor control in people with hyperfunctional voice disorders (HVDs) have found evidence of unusually large responses to auditory feedback perturbations of fundamental frequency (<i>F</i>0) and more variable voice onset times in unperturbed speech. However, it is unknown whether people with HVDs perform similarly to people with typical voices when asked to make small changes in vocal parameters in volitional tasks. The purpose of this study was to compare performance on minimal movement tasks for <i>F</i>0 and intensity in people with and without HVDs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-six people with HVDs and 26 matched controls participated in tasks to assess the smallest volitional increases and decreases they could make in vocal <i>F</i>0 and intensity. Measures included the mean smallest change, variability of change, and accuracy of the direction of change. Group differences were tested with general linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between people with and without HVDs on any of the measures. Singers produced significantly smaller mean smallest changes of both <i>F</i>0 and intensity than nonsingers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the interpretation of prior studies of auditory-motor control in people with HVDs. Specifically, unusually large responses to perturbations of vocal auditory feedback cannot be explained by a broader impairment of the ability to make small changes in the vocal parameters <i>F</i>0 or intensity. The method devised to assess minimal movements for voice is sensitive to relevant group differences, such as singing experience.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30004969.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"4736-4748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volitional Control of Frequency and Intensity in Speakers With and Without Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Mara R Kapsner-Smith, Juli Rosenzweig, Haley Wilcox, Neel Bhatt, J P Giliberto, Ludo Max, Tanya L Eadie, Cara E Stepp\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prior studies of vocal auditory-motor control in people with hyperfunctional voice disorders (HVDs) have found evidence of unusually large responses to auditory feedback perturbations of fundamental frequency (<i>F</i>0) and more variable voice onset times in unperturbed speech. However, it is unknown whether people with HVDs perform similarly to people with typical voices when asked to make small changes in vocal parameters in volitional tasks. The purpose of this study was to compare performance on minimal movement tasks for <i>F</i>0 and intensity in people with and without HVDs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-six people with HVDs and 26 matched controls participated in tasks to assess the smallest volitional increases and decreases they could make in vocal <i>F</i>0 and intensity. Measures included the mean smallest change, variability of change, and accuracy of the direction of change. Group differences were tested with general linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between people with and without HVDs on any of the measures. Singers produced significantly smaller mean smallest changes of both <i>F</i>0 and intensity than nonsingers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the interpretation of prior studies of auditory-motor control in people with HVDs. Specifically, unusually large responses to perturbations of vocal auditory feedback cannot be explained by a broader impairment of the ability to make small changes in the vocal parameters <i>F</i>0 or intensity. The method devised to assess minimal movements for voice is sensitive to relevant group differences, such as singing experience.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30004969.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4736-4748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:先前对功能性语音障碍(hvd)患者的声音听觉运动控制的研究发现,在无干扰的语音中,对基频(F0)的听觉反馈扰动的反应异常大,并且声音发作时间变化更大。然而,当被要求在意志任务中对声音参数进行微小改变时,hvd患者的表现是否与声音正常的人相似尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较hvd患者和非hvd患者在F0和强度的最小运动任务上的表现。方法:26名hvd患者和26名匹配的对照组参与评估他们在声音F0和强度上的最小意志增减的任务。测量包括平均最小变化、变化的可变性和变化方向的准确性。用一般线性模型检验组间差异。结果:hvd患者和非hvd患者在各项指标上均无显著差异。歌手产生的F0和强度的平均最小变化明显小于非歌手。结论:我们的发现支持对hvd患者听觉运动控制的先前研究的解释。具体来说,对声音听觉反馈扰动的异常大的反应不能用在声音参数F0或强度上做出微小变化的能力的更广泛的损害来解释。这种评估声音最小动作的方法对相关的群体差异很敏感,比如唱歌经验。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30004969。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volitional Control of Frequency and Intensity in Speakers With and Without Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders.

Purpose: Prior studies of vocal auditory-motor control in people with hyperfunctional voice disorders (HVDs) have found evidence of unusually large responses to auditory feedback perturbations of fundamental frequency (F0) and more variable voice onset times in unperturbed speech. However, it is unknown whether people with HVDs perform similarly to people with typical voices when asked to make small changes in vocal parameters in volitional tasks. The purpose of this study was to compare performance on minimal movement tasks for F0 and intensity in people with and without HVDs.

Method: Twenty-six people with HVDs and 26 matched controls participated in tasks to assess the smallest volitional increases and decreases they could make in vocal F0 and intensity. Measures included the mean smallest change, variability of change, and accuracy of the direction of change. Group differences were tested with general linear models.

Results: No significant differences were found between people with and without HVDs on any of the measures. Singers produced significantly smaller mean smallest changes of both F0 and intensity than nonsingers.

Conclusions: Our findings support the interpretation of prior studies of auditory-motor control in people with HVDs. Specifically, unusually large responses to perturbations of vocal auditory feedback cannot be explained by a broader impairment of the ability to make small changes in the vocal parameters F0 or intensity. The method devised to assess minimal movements for voice is sensitive to relevant group differences, such as singing experience.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30004969.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信