从教学课堂到计算机辅助模拟教学学习策略:对印度医学和准医学学生知识成果的影响。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Pranathi R, Savitha D, Taniya A, Vedashree H, Aswathi S
{"title":"从教学课堂到计算机辅助模拟教学学习策略:对印度医学和准医学学生知识成果的影响。","authors":"Pranathi R, Savitha D, Taniya A, Vedashree H, Aswathi S","doi":"10.1152/advan.00125.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The amphibian dissection for medical students was halted by the restrictions imposed by the National regulatory guidelines, prompting medical curricula to revise and innovate instructional methods. Hence there is a critical need for potential innovative solutions to enhance students' understanding of physiological concepts. Therefore, this study aimed (a) to evaluate the gain in knowledge and retention with computer assisted simulation (CAS) vs traditional (TT) teaching learning strategies in first year medical and paramedical students, and (b) to obtain students' and faculty feedback about strengths and limitations of both strategies. Medical and paramedical students, with prior theoretical knowledge, were separately randomized into CAS or TT groups after consenting. Knowledge gain and retention were assessed using multiple-choice questionnaires before, immediately after, and 15 days post-exposure. Faculty and students feedback on the strengths and limitations of the teaching-learning strategies was collected. Results showed similar knowledge gain in both CAS and TT groups for medical students (CAS: 16.76 ± 3.69, TT: 15.94 ± 3.75, p < 0.001), with significantly better retention in CAS (16.10 ± 3.40) compared to TT (13.38 ± 3.21, p < 0.001). For paramedical students, knowledge gain was comparable, but retention was reduced in CAS (9.60 ± 2.23) compared to TT (10.35 ± 1.76, p < 0.05). Students appreciated the use of CAS program and suggested a blended learning module. In conclusion, integrating a blended learning module (CAS and TT) into the undergraduate curriculum can be an effective alternative to enhance knowledge gain and retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Didactic classrooms to Computer-assisted-Simulated Teaching Learning Strategy: Impact on Knowledge outcomes in Medical and Para medical students in India.\",\"authors\":\"Pranathi R, Savitha D, Taniya A, Vedashree H, Aswathi S\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00125.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The amphibian dissection for medical students was halted by the restrictions imposed by the National regulatory guidelines, prompting medical curricula to revise and innovate instructional methods. Hence there is a critical need for potential innovative solutions to enhance students' understanding of physiological concepts. Therefore, this study aimed (a) to evaluate the gain in knowledge and retention with computer assisted simulation (CAS) vs traditional (TT) teaching learning strategies in first year medical and paramedical students, and (b) to obtain students' and faculty feedback about strengths and limitations of both strategies. Medical and paramedical students, with prior theoretical knowledge, were separately randomized into CAS or TT groups after consenting. Knowledge gain and retention were assessed using multiple-choice questionnaires before, immediately after, and 15 days post-exposure. Faculty and students feedback on the strengths and limitations of the teaching-learning strategies was collected. Results showed similar knowledge gain in both CAS and TT groups for medical students (CAS: 16.76 ± 3.69, TT: 15.94 ± 3.75, p < 0.001), with significantly better retention in CAS (16.10 ± 3.40) compared to TT (13.38 ± 3.21, p < 0.001). For paramedical students, knowledge gain was comparable, but retention was reduced in CAS (9.60 ± 2.23) compared to TT (10.35 ± 1.76, p < 0.05). Students appreciated the use of CAS program and suggested a blended learning module. In conclusion, integrating a blended learning module (CAS and TT) into the undergraduate curriculum can be an effective alternative to enhance knowledge gain and retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00125.2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00125.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于国家监管指导方针的限制,医学生的两栖动物解剖停止了,促使医学课程修改和创新教学方法。因此,迫切需要潜在的创新解决方案来增强学生对生理概念的理解。因此,本研究的目的是(a)评估计算机辅助模拟(CAS)与传统(TT)教学策略在一年级医学和辅助医学学生中的知识增益和记忆,以及(b)获得学生和教师对这两种策略的优势和局限性的反馈。具有前期理论知识的医学生和准医学生经同意后分别随机分为CAS组和TT组。在暴露前、暴露后和暴露后15天分别使用多项选择问卷评估知识获得和记忆。收集了教师和学生对教学策略的优势和局限性的反馈。结果显示,医学生在CAS组和TT组的知识增益相当(CAS: 16.76±3.69,TT: 15.94±3.75,p < 0.001), CAS组的知识保留(16.10±3.40)明显优于TT组(13.38±3.21,p < 0.001)。辅助医学生的知识获得与TT相当,但CAS的知识保留(9.60±2.23)低于TT(10.35±1.76,p < 0.05)。学生们对CAS项目的使用表示赞赏,并建议采用混合学习模块。综上所述,将混合学习模块(CAS和TT)整合到本科课程中可以有效地提高知识的获取和保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Didactic classrooms to Computer-assisted-Simulated Teaching Learning Strategy: Impact on Knowledge outcomes in Medical and Para medical students in India.

The amphibian dissection for medical students was halted by the restrictions imposed by the National regulatory guidelines, prompting medical curricula to revise and innovate instructional methods. Hence there is a critical need for potential innovative solutions to enhance students' understanding of physiological concepts. Therefore, this study aimed (a) to evaluate the gain in knowledge and retention with computer assisted simulation (CAS) vs traditional (TT) teaching learning strategies in first year medical and paramedical students, and (b) to obtain students' and faculty feedback about strengths and limitations of both strategies. Medical and paramedical students, with prior theoretical knowledge, were separately randomized into CAS or TT groups after consenting. Knowledge gain and retention were assessed using multiple-choice questionnaires before, immediately after, and 15 days post-exposure. Faculty and students feedback on the strengths and limitations of the teaching-learning strategies was collected. Results showed similar knowledge gain in both CAS and TT groups for medical students (CAS: 16.76 ± 3.69, TT: 15.94 ± 3.75, p < 0.001), with significantly better retention in CAS (16.10 ± 3.40) compared to TT (13.38 ± 3.21, p < 0.001). For paramedical students, knowledge gain was comparable, but retention was reduced in CAS (9.60 ± 2.23) compared to TT (10.35 ± 1.76, p < 0.05). Students appreciated the use of CAS program and suggested a blended learning module. In conclusion, integrating a blended learning module (CAS and TT) into the undergraduate curriculum can be an effective alternative to enhance knowledge gain and retention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信