{"title":"肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂和托珠单抗治疗高须动脉炎的药物保留率比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Takahiro Sugiyama, Shunsuke Furuta, Taro Iwamoto, Kei Ikeda, Shin-Ichiro Kagami, Yasuhiko Kita, Kazuhiro Kurasawa, Shigekazu Takahashi, Daiki Nakagomi, Masaki Hiraguri, Hiroshi Nakajima","doi":"10.1080/25785826.2025.2557038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared the drug retention rate of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (TNFi) and tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) as an index of balance between effectiveness and safety in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We included 50 TAK patients who received biologics in nine hospitals. All patients fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for TAK. We retrospectively collected clinical information. We analyzed the drug retention rates and the reasons for discontinuation regarding TNFi and tocilizumab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prednisolone dose at the start of the first biologics was a median of 15 mg/day, and an immunosuppressant was used in 25 patients. Tocilizumab was the most frequent first biologics (64%). Twenty-seven of 32 patients continued on tocilizumab, and four of 18 patients continued on TNFi. The retention rate was significantly higher in tocilizumab than in TNFi (87.9% <i>vs.</i> 66.7% at one year, <i>p</i> = 0.024). The reasons for discontinuing tocilizumab were primary failure in two patients, and other reasons in three. The reasons for discontinuing TNFi were secondary failure in five patients, primary failure in four patients, and other reasons in five.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tocilizumab has a higher continuation rate than TNFi, suggesting that tocilizumab may have better benefit-risk balance for TAK patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":37286,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of drug retention rates between TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab for Takayasu arteritis: a multicenter retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Takahiro Sugiyama, Shunsuke Furuta, Taro Iwamoto, Kei Ikeda, Shin-Ichiro Kagami, Yasuhiko Kita, Kazuhiro Kurasawa, Shigekazu Takahashi, Daiki Nakagomi, Masaki Hiraguri, Hiroshi Nakajima\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25785826.2025.2557038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared the drug retention rate of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (TNFi) and tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) as an index of balance between effectiveness and safety in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We included 50 TAK patients who received biologics in nine hospitals. All patients fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for TAK. We retrospectively collected clinical information. We analyzed the drug retention rates and the reasons for discontinuation regarding TNFi and tocilizumab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prednisolone dose at the start of the first biologics was a median of 15 mg/day, and an immunosuppressant was used in 25 patients. Tocilizumab was the most frequent first biologics (64%). Twenty-seven of 32 patients continued on tocilizumab, and four of 18 patients continued on TNFi. The retention rate was significantly higher in tocilizumab than in TNFi (87.9% <i>vs.</i> 66.7% at one year, <i>p</i> = 0.024). The reasons for discontinuing tocilizumab were primary failure in two patients, and other reasons in three. The reasons for discontinuing TNFi were secondary failure in five patients, primary failure in four patients, and other reasons in five.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tocilizumab has a higher continuation rate than TNFi, suggesting that tocilizumab may have better benefit-risk balance for TAK patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunological Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785826.2025.2557038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785826.2025.2557038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们比较肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂(TNFi)和托珠单抗在高松动脉炎(TAK)中的药物保留率,作为在现实世界环境中有效性和安全性之间平衡的指标。方法:选取9家医院接受生物制剂治疗的50例TAK患者。所有患者均符合1990年美国风湿病学会的TAK分类标准。我们回顾性地收集临床资料。我们分析了TNFi和托珠单抗的药物保留率和停药原因。结果:第一批生物制剂开始时的泼尼松龙剂量中位数为15mg /天,25例患者使用免疫抑制剂。托珠单抗是最常见的首选生物制剂(64%)。32名患者中有27名继续使用托珠单抗,18名患者中有4名继续使用TNFi。托珠单抗组的保留率明显高于TNFi组(一年后为87.9% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.024)。停止tocilizumab治疗的原因是2例患者的原发性失败,3例患者的其他原因。停止TNFi治疗的原因有5例为继发性失败,4例为原发性失败,5例为其他原因。结论:Tocilizumab的延续率高于TNFi,提示Tocilizumab对TAK患者可能具有更好的利益-风险平衡。
Comparison of drug retention rates between TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab for Takayasu arteritis: a multicenter retrospective study.
Objective: We compared the drug retention rate of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (TNFi) and tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) as an index of balance between effectiveness and safety in a real-world setting.
Method: We included 50 TAK patients who received biologics in nine hospitals. All patients fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for TAK. We retrospectively collected clinical information. We analyzed the drug retention rates and the reasons for discontinuation regarding TNFi and tocilizumab.
Results: The prednisolone dose at the start of the first biologics was a median of 15 mg/day, and an immunosuppressant was used in 25 patients. Tocilizumab was the most frequent first biologics (64%). Twenty-seven of 32 patients continued on tocilizumab, and four of 18 patients continued on TNFi. The retention rate was significantly higher in tocilizumab than in TNFi (87.9% vs. 66.7% at one year, p = 0.024). The reasons for discontinuing tocilizumab were primary failure in two patients, and other reasons in three. The reasons for discontinuing TNFi were secondary failure in five patients, primary failure in four patients, and other reasons in five.
Conclusion: Tocilizumab has a higher continuation rate than TNFi, suggesting that tocilizumab may have better benefit-risk balance for TAK patients.