肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂和托珠单抗治疗高须动脉炎的药物保留率比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。

IF 2.9 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Takahiro Sugiyama, Shunsuke Furuta, Taro Iwamoto, Kei Ikeda, Shin-Ichiro Kagami, Yasuhiko Kita, Kazuhiro Kurasawa, Shigekazu Takahashi, Daiki Nakagomi, Masaki Hiraguri, Hiroshi Nakajima
{"title":"肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂和托珠单抗治疗高须动脉炎的药物保留率比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Takahiro Sugiyama, Shunsuke Furuta, Taro Iwamoto, Kei Ikeda, Shin-Ichiro Kagami, Yasuhiko Kita, Kazuhiro Kurasawa, Shigekazu Takahashi, Daiki Nakagomi, Masaki Hiraguri, Hiroshi Nakajima","doi":"10.1080/25785826.2025.2557038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared the drug retention rate of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (TNFi) and tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) as an index of balance between effectiveness and safety in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We included 50 TAK patients who received biologics in nine hospitals. All patients fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for TAK. We retrospectively collected clinical information. We analyzed the drug retention rates and the reasons for discontinuation regarding TNFi and tocilizumab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prednisolone dose at the start of the first biologics was a median of 15 mg/day, and an immunosuppressant was used in 25 patients. Tocilizumab was the most frequent first biologics (64%). Twenty-seven of 32 patients continued on tocilizumab, and four of 18 patients continued on TNFi. The retention rate was significantly higher in tocilizumab than in TNFi (87.9% <i>vs.</i> 66.7% at one year, <i>p</i> = 0.024). The reasons for discontinuing tocilizumab were primary failure in two patients, and other reasons in three. The reasons for discontinuing TNFi were secondary failure in five patients, primary failure in four patients, and other reasons in five.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tocilizumab has a higher continuation rate than TNFi, suggesting that tocilizumab may have better benefit-risk balance for TAK patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":37286,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of drug retention rates between TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab for Takayasu arteritis: a multicenter retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Takahiro Sugiyama, Shunsuke Furuta, Taro Iwamoto, Kei Ikeda, Shin-Ichiro Kagami, Yasuhiko Kita, Kazuhiro Kurasawa, Shigekazu Takahashi, Daiki Nakagomi, Masaki Hiraguri, Hiroshi Nakajima\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25785826.2025.2557038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared the drug retention rate of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (TNFi) and tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) as an index of balance between effectiveness and safety in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We included 50 TAK patients who received biologics in nine hospitals. All patients fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for TAK. We retrospectively collected clinical information. We analyzed the drug retention rates and the reasons for discontinuation regarding TNFi and tocilizumab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prednisolone dose at the start of the first biologics was a median of 15 mg/day, and an immunosuppressant was used in 25 patients. Tocilizumab was the most frequent first biologics (64%). Twenty-seven of 32 patients continued on tocilizumab, and four of 18 patients continued on TNFi. The retention rate was significantly higher in tocilizumab than in TNFi (87.9% <i>vs.</i> 66.7% at one year, <i>p</i> = 0.024). The reasons for discontinuing tocilizumab were primary failure in two patients, and other reasons in three. The reasons for discontinuing TNFi were secondary failure in five patients, primary failure in four patients, and other reasons in five.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tocilizumab has a higher continuation rate than TNFi, suggesting that tocilizumab may have better benefit-risk balance for TAK patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunological Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785826.2025.2557038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785826.2025.2557038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们比较肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂(TNFi)和托珠单抗在高松动脉炎(TAK)中的药物保留率,作为在现实世界环境中有效性和安全性之间平衡的指标。方法:选取9家医院接受生物制剂治疗的50例TAK患者。所有患者均符合1990年美国风湿病学会的TAK分类标准。我们回顾性地收集临床资料。我们分析了TNFi和托珠单抗的药物保留率和停药原因。结果:第一批生物制剂开始时的泼尼松龙剂量中位数为15mg /天,25例患者使用免疫抑制剂。托珠单抗是最常见的首选生物制剂(64%)。32名患者中有27名继续使用托珠单抗,18名患者中有4名继续使用TNFi。托珠单抗组的保留率明显高于TNFi组(一年后为87.9% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.024)。停止tocilizumab治疗的原因是2例患者的原发性失败,3例患者的其他原因。停止TNFi治疗的原因有5例为继发性失败,4例为原发性失败,5例为其他原因。结论:Tocilizumab的延续率高于TNFi,提示Tocilizumab对TAK患者可能具有更好的利益-风险平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of drug retention rates between TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab for Takayasu arteritis: a multicenter retrospective study.

Objective: We compared the drug retention rate of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (TNFi) and tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) as an index of balance between effectiveness and safety in a real-world setting.

Method: We included 50 TAK patients who received biologics in nine hospitals. All patients fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for TAK. We retrospectively collected clinical information. We analyzed the drug retention rates and the reasons for discontinuation regarding TNFi and tocilizumab.

Results: The prednisolone dose at the start of the first biologics was a median of 15 mg/day, and an immunosuppressant was used in 25 patients. Tocilizumab was the most frequent first biologics (64%). Twenty-seven of 32 patients continued on tocilizumab, and four of 18 patients continued on TNFi. The retention rate was significantly higher in tocilizumab than in TNFi (87.9% vs. 66.7% at one year, p = 0.024). The reasons for discontinuing tocilizumab were primary failure in two patients, and other reasons in three. The reasons for discontinuing TNFi were secondary failure in five patients, primary failure in four patients, and other reasons in five.

Conclusion: Tocilizumab has a higher continuation rate than TNFi, suggesting that tocilizumab may have better benefit-risk balance for TAK patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunological Medicine
Immunological Medicine Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信