统一感冒凝集素的血清学检测。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Vox Sanguinis Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-04 DOI:10.1111/vox.70069
Marit Jalink, Femke V M Mulder, Marianne E George, Josephine M I Vos, Masja de Haas, Claudia C Folman
{"title":"统一感冒凝集素的血清学检测。","authors":"Marit Jalink, Femke V M Mulder, Marianne E George, Josephine M I Vos, Masja de Haas, Claudia C Folman","doi":"10.1111/vox.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Cold agglutinins (CAs) are immunoglobulin M autoantibodies that optimally bind to red blood cells at low temperatures. The clinical significance of CAs is usually characterized by the CA titre and thermal amplitude. However, there is no consensus on the optimal testing strategy. In this study, we sought to unify CA testing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A survey on CA evaluation was conducted in 17 Dutch transfusion laboratories. Additionally, samples from 16 patients with CAs were used to evaluate (pre)analytical variations in test outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey on CA evaluation revealed heterogeneity in the indications for CA workup and in (pre)analytical conditions. Titration results between EDTA plasma and serum did not differ. However, titres were higher when 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) was present in the titration medium. Routinely collected EDTA-blood kept at 37°C for 10 min before plasma isolation (reheated) showed equivalent results to plasma from blood kept at 37°C from collection through separation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that different (pre)analytical conditions influence test outcomes in the characterization of CAs. Importantly, CA testing can effectively be performed with reheated blood samples, which will facilitate a more practical workflow for laboratories. International standardization of CA testing for diagnostic use is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":23631,"journal":{"name":"Vox Sanguinis","volume":"120 9","pages":"944-949"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unifying serological testing for cold agglutinins.\",\"authors\":\"Marit Jalink, Femke V M Mulder, Marianne E George, Josephine M I Vos, Masja de Haas, Claudia C Folman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vox.70069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Cold agglutinins (CAs) are immunoglobulin M autoantibodies that optimally bind to red blood cells at low temperatures. The clinical significance of CAs is usually characterized by the CA titre and thermal amplitude. However, there is no consensus on the optimal testing strategy. In this study, we sought to unify CA testing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A survey on CA evaluation was conducted in 17 Dutch transfusion laboratories. Additionally, samples from 16 patients with CAs were used to evaluate (pre)analytical variations in test outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey on CA evaluation revealed heterogeneity in the indications for CA workup and in (pre)analytical conditions. Titration results between EDTA plasma and serum did not differ. However, titres were higher when 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) was present in the titration medium. Routinely collected EDTA-blood kept at 37°C for 10 min before plasma isolation (reheated) showed equivalent results to plasma from blood kept at 37°C from collection through separation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that different (pre)analytical conditions influence test outcomes in the characterization of CAs. Importantly, CA testing can effectively be performed with reheated blood samples, which will facilitate a more practical workflow for laboratories. International standardization of CA testing for diagnostic use is essential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"volume\":\"120 9\",\"pages\":\"944-949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422832/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70069\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Sanguinis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:冷凝集素(CAs)是免疫球蛋白M自身抗体,在低温下与红细胞结合最佳。CA的临床意义通常以CA滴度和热振幅为特征。然而,对于最优的测试策略并没有达成共识。在本研究中,我们试图统一CA测试。材料与方法:对荷兰17家输血实验室的CA评价进行了调查。此外,来自16例CAs患者的样本用于评估测试结果的(预)分析变化。结果:对CA评估的调查揭示了CA检查和(预)分析条件下适应症的异质性。血浆和血清EDTA滴定结果无差异。然而,当滴定培养基中含有2%牛血清白蛋白(BSA)时,滴度更高。常规采集的edta血液在37°C下保存10分钟,然后进行血浆分离(再加热),结果与37°C下采集的血浆分离结果相同。结论:本研究表明,不同的(前)分析条件会影响CAs表征的测试结果。重要的是,CA检测可以用再加热的血液样本有效地进行,这将促进实验室更实际的工作流程。诊断用CA检测的国际标准化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Unifying serological testing for cold agglutinins.

Unifying serological testing for cold agglutinins.

Unifying serological testing for cold agglutinins.

Background and objectives: Cold agglutinins (CAs) are immunoglobulin M autoantibodies that optimally bind to red blood cells at low temperatures. The clinical significance of CAs is usually characterized by the CA titre and thermal amplitude. However, there is no consensus on the optimal testing strategy. In this study, we sought to unify CA testing.

Materials and methods: A survey on CA evaluation was conducted in 17 Dutch transfusion laboratories. Additionally, samples from 16 patients with CAs were used to evaluate (pre)analytical variations in test outcomes.

Results: The survey on CA evaluation revealed heterogeneity in the indications for CA workup and in (pre)analytical conditions. Titration results between EDTA plasma and serum did not differ. However, titres were higher when 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) was present in the titration medium. Routinely collected EDTA-blood kept at 37°C for 10 min before plasma isolation (reheated) showed equivalent results to plasma from blood kept at 37°C from collection through separation.

Conclusion: This study showed that different (pre)analytical conditions influence test outcomes in the characterization of CAs. Importantly, CA testing can effectively be performed with reheated blood samples, which will facilitate a more practical workflow for laboratories. International standardization of CA testing for diagnostic use is essential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vox Sanguinis
Vox Sanguinis 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
156
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vox Sanguinis reports on important, novel developments in transfusion medicine. Original papers, reviews and international fora are published on all aspects of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, comprising five main sections: 1) Transfusion - Transmitted Disease and its Prevention: Identification and epidemiology of infectious agents transmissible by blood; Bacterial contamination of blood components; Donor recruitment and selection methods; Pathogen inactivation. 2) Blood Component Collection and Production: Blood collection methods and devices (including apheresis); Plasma fractionation techniques and plasma derivatives; Preparation of labile blood components; Inventory management; Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and storage; Collection and storage of tissues; Quality management and good manufacturing practice; Automation and information technology. 3) Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies: Transfusion thresholds and audits; Haemovigilance; Clinical trials regarding appropriate haemotherapy; Non-infectious adverse affects of transfusion; Therapeutic apheresis; Support of transplant patients; Gene therapy and immunotherapy. 4) Immunohaematology and Immunogenetics: Autoimmunity in haematology; Alloimmunity of blood; Pre-transfusion testing; Immunodiagnostics; Immunobiology; Complement in immunohaematology; Blood typing reagents; Genetic markers of blood cells and serum proteins: polymorphisms and function; Genetic markers and disease; Parentage testing and forensic immunohaematology. 5) Cellular Therapy: Cell-based therapies; Stem cell sources; Stem cell processing and storage; Stem cell products; Stem cell plasticity; Regenerative medicine with cells; Cellular immunotherapy; Molecular therapy; Gene therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信