Rebecca Lee, Grace Koo, Matthew S Krantz, Christine Allocco, Elizabeth J Phillips, Cosby A Stone
{"title":"使用多种抗生素过敏评估策略在实体器官移植人群中去除抗生素过敏标签。","authors":"Rebecca Lee, Grace Koo, Matthew S Krantz, Christine Allocco, Elizabeth J Phillips, Cosby A Stone","doi":"10.1111/tid.70099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First-line antibiotics, such as penicillins, cephalosporins, and sulfonamides, are critical for preventing infections in immunocompromised solid organ transplant (SOT) patients. However, many patients are labeled with multiple antibiotic allergies (AALs) prior to transplant, increasing their risk of adverse outcomes. Because these patients often travel long distances and follow complex care plans, minimizing the number of drug allergy clinic (DAC) visits is important to avoid disruption and improve care continuity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of SOT patients evaluated at Vanderbilt University Medical Center outpatient DAC between 2014 and 2024. We assessed the efficacy, feasibility, and efficiency of a multiple antibiotic allergy evaluation strategy (MAAES), where patients with two or more low-risk AALs underwent consolidated evaluation, testing, and oral challenges, with the goal of delabeling as many as three AALs in a single visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 184 SOT patients referred for evaluation, the median age was 57 years (IQR 47, 64); 112/184 (61%) were female, and 64/184 (35%) traveled from out-of-state. A total of 53 patients (29%) had two or more first-line AALs. Of these, 49 (93%) had labels successfully removed during their visit: 37 penicillin, 25 cephalosporin, and 24 sulfa allergy labels were delabeled. MAAES reduced the number of required visits to address these AALs by 61%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAAES enabled safe, efficient, and consolidated AAL evaluation and removal in SOT patients. In 57% of patients with ≥ 2 first-line AALs, all were safely delabeled in a single clinic visit, improving care efficiency and antibiotic access.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70099"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delabeling Antibiotic Allergy in the Solid Organ Transplant Population Using a Multiple Antibiotic Allergy Evaluation Strategy.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Lee, Grace Koo, Matthew S Krantz, Christine Allocco, Elizabeth J Phillips, Cosby A Stone\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tid.70099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First-line antibiotics, such as penicillins, cephalosporins, and sulfonamides, are critical for preventing infections in immunocompromised solid organ transplant (SOT) patients. However, many patients are labeled with multiple antibiotic allergies (AALs) prior to transplant, increasing their risk of adverse outcomes. Because these patients often travel long distances and follow complex care plans, minimizing the number of drug allergy clinic (DAC) visits is important to avoid disruption and improve care continuity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of SOT patients evaluated at Vanderbilt University Medical Center outpatient DAC between 2014 and 2024. We assessed the efficacy, feasibility, and efficiency of a multiple antibiotic allergy evaluation strategy (MAAES), where patients with two or more low-risk AALs underwent consolidated evaluation, testing, and oral challenges, with the goal of delabeling as many as three AALs in a single visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 184 SOT patients referred for evaluation, the median age was 57 years (IQR 47, 64); 112/184 (61%) were female, and 64/184 (35%) traveled from out-of-state. A total of 53 patients (29%) had two or more first-line AALs. Of these, 49 (93%) had labels successfully removed during their visit: 37 penicillin, 25 cephalosporin, and 24 sulfa allergy labels were delabeled. MAAES reduced the number of required visits to address these AALs by 61%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAAES enabled safe, efficient, and consolidated AAL evaluation and removal in SOT patients. In 57% of patients with ≥ 2 first-line AALs, all were safely delabeled in a single clinic visit, improving care efficiency and antibiotic access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70099\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70099\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Delabeling Antibiotic Allergy in the Solid Organ Transplant Population Using a Multiple Antibiotic Allergy Evaluation Strategy.
Background: First-line antibiotics, such as penicillins, cephalosporins, and sulfonamides, are critical for preventing infections in immunocompromised solid organ transplant (SOT) patients. However, many patients are labeled with multiple antibiotic allergies (AALs) prior to transplant, increasing their risk of adverse outcomes. Because these patients often travel long distances and follow complex care plans, minimizing the number of drug allergy clinic (DAC) visits is important to avoid disruption and improve care continuity.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of SOT patients evaluated at Vanderbilt University Medical Center outpatient DAC between 2014 and 2024. We assessed the efficacy, feasibility, and efficiency of a multiple antibiotic allergy evaluation strategy (MAAES), where patients with two or more low-risk AALs underwent consolidated evaluation, testing, and oral challenges, with the goal of delabeling as many as three AALs in a single visit.
Results: Among 184 SOT patients referred for evaluation, the median age was 57 years (IQR 47, 64); 112/184 (61%) were female, and 64/184 (35%) traveled from out-of-state. A total of 53 patients (29%) had two or more first-line AALs. Of these, 49 (93%) had labels successfully removed during their visit: 37 penicillin, 25 cephalosporin, and 24 sulfa allergy labels were delabeled. MAAES reduced the number of required visits to address these AALs by 61%.
Conclusions: MAAES enabled safe, efficient, and consolidated AAL evaluation and removal in SOT patients. In 57% of patients with ≥ 2 first-line AALs, all were safely delabeled in a single clinic visit, improving care efficiency and antibiotic access.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.