Ziv Savin, Kavita Gupta, Christopher Connors, Yuval Elkun, Eve Frangopoulos, Raymond Khargi, Vinay Durbhakula, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta
{"title":"经皮肾镜取石术中肾内压升高会增加术后疼痛吗?","authors":"Ziv Savin, Kavita Gupta, Christopher Connors, Yuval Elkun, Eve Frangopoulos, Raymond Khargi, Vinay Durbhakula, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01849-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High intrarenal pressures (IRP) during mini-PCNL have been postulated to result in increased postoperative pain but no studies have evaluated this to our knowledge. We sought to determine if there is a correlation between IRP and immediate postoperative pain when using different tract sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were enrolled and assigned for standard (s-PCNL, 24fr), suctioning-mini (sm-PCNL, 16fr) and non-suctioning-mini (nsm-PCNL, 17.5fr) PCNLs. IRP was measured continuously with a novel technique of real-time monitoring using a 0.014 single-use pressure-sensing COMET™ guidewire. Postoperative pain was documented at the PACU using the VAS pain score. Correlation tests were used to evaluate the association between maximal IRP or tract size and postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 30 patients with 10 patients in each group. The median age was 59 and the median stone volume was 438 mm<sup>3</sup>. None of the patients were pre-stented. Baseline characteristics were comparable across the groups. The median average IRP of the entire cohort was 7 mmHg (IQR 5-11), and the median maximal pressure was 50 mmHg (IQR 30-66). There were no IRP differences between the groups (p = 0.67 for average; p = 0.35 for maximal). Average and maximal VAS pain scores were not different between the tract size groups (p = 0.09 and p = 0.17, respectively), and no significant association was found between maximal IRP and pain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IRP range during PCNL is relatively low, regardless of the tract size. There was no association between the level of maximal IRP and postoperative pain. Our findings provide new in-vivo evidence challenging the commonly cited 30 mmHg IRP threshold and support its reevaluation, given the lack of strong clinical validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do elevated intrarenal pressures during mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy increase postoperative pain??\",\"authors\":\"Ziv Savin, Kavita Gupta, Christopher Connors, Yuval Elkun, Eve Frangopoulos, Raymond Khargi, Vinay Durbhakula, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00240-025-01849-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High intrarenal pressures (IRP) during mini-PCNL have been postulated to result in increased postoperative pain but no studies have evaluated this to our knowledge. We sought to determine if there is a correlation between IRP and immediate postoperative pain when using different tract sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were enrolled and assigned for standard (s-PCNL, 24fr), suctioning-mini (sm-PCNL, 16fr) and non-suctioning-mini (nsm-PCNL, 17.5fr) PCNLs. IRP was measured continuously with a novel technique of real-time monitoring using a 0.014 single-use pressure-sensing COMET™ guidewire. Postoperative pain was documented at the PACU using the VAS pain score. Correlation tests were used to evaluate the association between maximal IRP or tract size and postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 30 patients with 10 patients in each group. The median age was 59 and the median stone volume was 438 mm<sup>3</sup>. None of the patients were pre-stented. Baseline characteristics were comparable across the groups. The median average IRP of the entire cohort was 7 mmHg (IQR 5-11), and the median maximal pressure was 50 mmHg (IQR 30-66). There were no IRP differences between the groups (p = 0.67 for average; p = 0.35 for maximal). Average and maximal VAS pain scores were not different between the tract size groups (p = 0.09 and p = 0.17, respectively), and no significant association was found between maximal IRP and pain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IRP range during PCNL is relatively low, regardless of the tract size. There was no association between the level of maximal IRP and postoperative pain. Our findings provide new in-vivo evidence challenging the commonly cited 30 mmHg IRP threshold and support its reevaluation, given the lack of strong clinical validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01849-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01849-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do elevated intrarenal pressures during mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy increase postoperative pain??
Introduction: High intrarenal pressures (IRP) during mini-PCNL have been postulated to result in increased postoperative pain but no studies have evaluated this to our knowledge. We sought to determine if there is a correlation between IRP and immediate postoperative pain when using different tract sizes.
Methods: Patients were enrolled and assigned for standard (s-PCNL, 24fr), suctioning-mini (sm-PCNL, 16fr) and non-suctioning-mini (nsm-PCNL, 17.5fr) PCNLs. IRP was measured continuously with a novel technique of real-time monitoring using a 0.014 single-use pressure-sensing COMET™ guidewire. Postoperative pain was documented at the PACU using the VAS pain score. Correlation tests were used to evaluate the association between maximal IRP or tract size and postoperative pain.
Results: The study cohort consisted of 30 patients with 10 patients in each group. The median age was 59 and the median stone volume was 438 mm3. None of the patients were pre-stented. Baseline characteristics were comparable across the groups. The median average IRP of the entire cohort was 7 mmHg (IQR 5-11), and the median maximal pressure was 50 mmHg (IQR 30-66). There were no IRP differences between the groups (p = 0.67 for average; p = 0.35 for maximal). Average and maximal VAS pain scores were not different between the tract size groups (p = 0.09 and p = 0.17, respectively), and no significant association was found between maximal IRP and pain scores.
Conclusion: The IRP range during PCNL is relatively low, regardless of the tract size. There was no association between the level of maximal IRP and postoperative pain. Our findings provide new in-vivo evidence challenging the commonly cited 30 mmHg IRP threshold and support its reevaluation, given the lack of strong clinical validation.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society
The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field.
Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.