Jeroen Berden, Giles T Hanley-Cook, Bernadette Chimera, Dagfinn Aune, Maria Gabriela M Pinho, Geneviève Nicolas, Bernard Srour, Christopher J Millett, Emine Koc Cakmak, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Esther M González-Gil, Eszter P Vamos, Jessica Blanco Lopez, Julia Baudry, Justine Berlivet, Kiara Chang, Mathilde Touvier, Charlotte Le Cornet, Chloé Marques, Christina C Dahm, Daniel B Ibsen, Franziska Jannasch, Guri Skeie, Maria-José Sanchez, Matthias B Schulze, Sara Grioni, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Ana M Jimenez Zabala, Anna Winkvist, Anne Tjønneland, Carlotta Sacerdote, Cecilie Kyrø, Elisabette Weiderpass, Marcela Guevara, Pauline Frenoy, Rosario Tumino, Salvatore Panico, Verena Katzke, Xuan Ren, Paolo Vineis, Pietro Ferrari, Carl Lachat, Inge Huybrechts
{"title":"量化超加工食品对环境和食物生物多样性的影响——来自EPIC研究的证据。","authors":"Jeroen Berden, Giles T Hanley-Cook, Bernadette Chimera, Dagfinn Aune, Maria Gabriela M Pinho, Geneviève Nicolas, Bernard Srour, Christopher J Millett, Emine Koc Cakmak, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Esther M González-Gil, Eszter P Vamos, Jessica Blanco Lopez, Julia Baudry, Justine Berlivet, Kiara Chang, Mathilde Touvier, Charlotte Le Cornet, Chloé Marques, Christina C Dahm, Daniel B Ibsen, Franziska Jannasch, Guri Skeie, Maria-José Sanchez, Matthias B Schulze, Sara Grioni, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Ana M Jimenez Zabala, Anna Winkvist, Anne Tjønneland, Carlotta Sacerdote, Cecilie Kyrø, Elisabette Weiderpass, Marcela Guevara, Pauline Frenoy, Rosario Tumino, Salvatore Panico, Verena Katzke, Xuan Ren, Paolo Vineis, Pietro Ferrari, Carl Lachat, Inge Huybrechts","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025101067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While associations of ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption with adverse health outcomes are accruing, its environmental and food biodiversity impacts remain underexplored. This study examines associations between UPF consumption and dietary greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe), land use and food biodiversity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study. Linear mixed models estimated associations between UPF intake (g/d and kcal/d) and GHGe (kg CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalents/day), land use (m<sup>2</sup>/d) and dietary species richness (DSR). Substitution analyses assessed the impact of replacing UPF with unprocessed or minimally processed foods.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>368 733 participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Europe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stronger associations were found for UPF consumption in relation with GHGe and land use compared with unprocessed or minimally processed food consumption. Substituting UPF with unprocessed or minimally processed foods was associated with lower GHGe (8·9 %; 95 % CI: -9·0, -8·9) and land use (9·3 %; -9·5; -9·2) when considering consumption by gram per day and higher GHGe (2·6 %; 95 % CI: 2·5, 2·6) and land use (1·2 %; 1·0; 1·3) when considering consumption in kilocalories per day. Substituting UPF by unprocessed or minimally processed foods led to negligible differences in DSR, both for consumption in grams (-0·1 %; -0·2; -0·1) and kilocalories (1·0 %; 1·0; 1·1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UPF consumption was strongly associated with GHGe and land use as compared with unprocessed or minimally processed food consumption, while associations with food biodiversity were marginal. Substituting UPF with unprocessed or minimally processed foods resulted in differing directions of associations with environmental impacts, depending on whether substitutions were weight or energy based.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the environmental and food biodiversity impacts of ultra-processed foods: evidence from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.\",\"authors\":\"Jeroen Berden, Giles T Hanley-Cook, Bernadette Chimera, Dagfinn Aune, Maria Gabriela M Pinho, Geneviève Nicolas, Bernard Srour, Christopher J Millett, Emine Koc Cakmak, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Esther M González-Gil, Eszter P Vamos, Jessica Blanco Lopez, Julia Baudry, Justine Berlivet, Kiara Chang, Mathilde Touvier, Charlotte Le Cornet, Chloé Marques, Christina C Dahm, Daniel B Ibsen, Franziska Jannasch, Guri Skeie, Maria-José Sanchez, Matthias B Schulze, Sara Grioni, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Ana M Jimenez Zabala, Anna Winkvist, Anne Tjønneland, Carlotta Sacerdote, Cecilie Kyrø, Elisabette Weiderpass, Marcela Guevara, Pauline Frenoy, Rosario Tumino, Salvatore Panico, Verena Katzke, Xuan Ren, Paolo Vineis, Pietro Ferrari, Carl Lachat, Inge Huybrechts\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1368980025101067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While associations of ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption with adverse health outcomes are accruing, its environmental and food biodiversity impacts remain underexplored. This study examines associations between UPF consumption and dietary greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe), land use and food biodiversity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study. Linear mixed models estimated associations between UPF intake (g/d and kcal/d) and GHGe (kg CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalents/day), land use (m<sup>2</sup>/d) and dietary species richness (DSR). Substitution analyses assessed the impact of replacing UPF with unprocessed or minimally processed foods.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>368 733 participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Europe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stronger associations were found for UPF consumption in relation with GHGe and land use compared with unprocessed or minimally processed food consumption. Substituting UPF with unprocessed or minimally processed foods was associated with lower GHGe (8·9 %; 95 % CI: -9·0, -8·9) and land use (9·3 %; -9·5; -9·2) when considering consumption by gram per day and higher GHGe (2·6 %; 95 % CI: 2·5, 2·6) and land use (1·2 %; 1·0; 1·3) when considering consumption in kilocalories per day. Substituting UPF by unprocessed or minimally processed foods led to negligible differences in DSR, both for consumption in grams (-0·1 %; -0·2; -0·1) and kilocalories (1·0 %; 1·0; 1·1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UPF consumption was strongly associated with GHGe and land use as compared with unprocessed or minimally processed food consumption, while associations with food biodiversity were marginal. Substituting UPF with unprocessed or minimally processed foods resulted in differing directions of associations with environmental impacts, depending on whether substitutions were weight or energy based.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025101067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025101067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying the environmental and food biodiversity impacts of ultra-processed foods: evidence from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.
Objective: While associations of ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption with adverse health outcomes are accruing, its environmental and food biodiversity impacts remain underexplored. This study examines associations between UPF consumption and dietary greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe), land use and food biodiversity.
Design: Prospective cohort study. Linear mixed models estimated associations between UPF intake (g/d and kcal/d) and GHGe (kg CO2-equivalents/day), land use (m2/d) and dietary species richness (DSR). Substitution analyses assessed the impact of replacing UPF with unprocessed or minimally processed foods.
Participants: 368 733 participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.
Setting: Europe.
Results: Stronger associations were found for UPF consumption in relation with GHGe and land use compared with unprocessed or minimally processed food consumption. Substituting UPF with unprocessed or minimally processed foods was associated with lower GHGe (8·9 %; 95 % CI: -9·0, -8·9) and land use (9·3 %; -9·5; -9·2) when considering consumption by gram per day and higher GHGe (2·6 %; 95 % CI: 2·5, 2·6) and land use (1·2 %; 1·0; 1·3) when considering consumption in kilocalories per day. Substituting UPF by unprocessed or minimally processed foods led to negligible differences in DSR, both for consumption in grams (-0·1 %; -0·2; -0·1) and kilocalories (1·0 %; 1·0; 1·1).
Conclusion: UPF consumption was strongly associated with GHGe and land use as compared with unprocessed or minimally processed food consumption, while associations with food biodiversity were marginal. Substituting UPF with unprocessed or minimally processed foods resulted in differing directions of associations with environmental impacts, depending on whether substitutions were weight or energy based.
期刊介绍：
Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
