Wei Bingting, Yang Chen, Ma Wei, Xie Mingjing, Xiong Yang, Wu Tingting, Zhang Xuebing
{"title":"一种新型拉链装置用于儿科门诊患者皮肤脓肿的伤口闭合:一个病例系列。","authors":"Wei Bingting, Yang Chen, Ma Wei, Xie Mingjing, Xiong Yang, Wu Tingting, Zhang Xuebing","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current management of pediatric cutaneous abscesses involves either spontaneous healing by secondary intention or suturing through tertiary intention, which are often lengthy processes that cause discomfort and distress among children. As it is noninvasive and simple, a novel zipper device is widely used for the primary wound closure of surgical incisions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the effectiveness of novel zipper device use for pediatric cutaneous abscess wound closure in an outpatient context.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 26 pediatric outpatients with simple cutaneous abscesses were included. After incision and drainage (I and D), the novel zipper device was applied once pus decreased significantly and fresh granulation tissue emerged. Wound healing time and pain score were tracked over the intervention period. Linear regression and restricted cubic spline models were also used to analyze the relationship between the intervention interval of time from I and D to zipper application and wound healing time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average (SD) wound healing time was 12.73 (3.16) days. Pain scores decreased significantly from a median of 2 during zipper use to 0 at removal. Linear regression analysis revealed 2 healing time predictors: infection size (B = 0.260, SE = 0.090, β = 0.260, t = 2.924, P = .008) and intervention interval of zipper use (B = 0.850, SE = 0.090, β = 0.810, t = 9.187, P = .001). A linear dose-response relationship was observed between intervention interval and healing time (Ptotal < .001, Pnonlinear = .406).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case series identifies the fifth day post-I and D as a potential threshold, and suggests that the optimal period of zipper device use is 3 days to 5 days following I and D of skin abscess to enhance early wound healing, beyond which extended intervention intervals prolong wound healing time.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"37 8","pages":"314-322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of a novel zipper device for wound closure of cutaneous abscesses in pediatric outpatients: a case series.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Bingting, Yang Chen, Ma Wei, Xie Mingjing, Xiong Yang, Wu Tingting, Zhang Xuebing\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current management of pediatric cutaneous abscesses involves either spontaneous healing by secondary intention or suturing through tertiary intention, which are often lengthy processes that cause discomfort and distress among children. As it is noninvasive and simple, a novel zipper device is widely used for the primary wound closure of surgical incisions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the effectiveness of novel zipper device use for pediatric cutaneous abscess wound closure in an outpatient context.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 26 pediatric outpatients with simple cutaneous abscesses were included. After incision and drainage (I and D), the novel zipper device was applied once pus decreased significantly and fresh granulation tissue emerged. Wound healing time and pain score were tracked over the intervention period. Linear regression and restricted cubic spline models were also used to analyze the relationship between the intervention interval of time from I and D to zipper application and wound healing time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average (SD) wound healing time was 12.73 (3.16) days. Pain scores decreased significantly from a median of 2 during zipper use to 0 at removal. Linear regression analysis revealed 2 healing time predictors: infection size (B = 0.260, SE = 0.090, β = 0.260, t = 2.924, P = .008) and intervention interval of zipper use (B = 0.850, SE = 0.090, β = 0.810, t = 9.187, P = .001). A linear dose-response relationship was observed between intervention interval and healing time (Ptotal < .001, Pnonlinear = .406).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case series identifies the fifth day post-I and D as a potential threshold, and suggests that the optimal period of zipper device use is 3 days to 5 days following I and D of skin abscess to enhance early wound healing, beyond which extended intervention intervals prolong wound healing time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"volume\":\"37 8\",\"pages\":\"314-322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目前儿科皮肤脓肿的治疗包括通过二级意图自发愈合或通过三级意图缝合,这通常是一个漫长的过程,会引起儿童的不适和痛苦。一种新型的拉链装置由于其无创性和操作简便,被广泛应用于外科切口的一期缝合。目的:描述新型拉链装置用于儿科皮肤脓肿伤口关闭在门诊的有效性。材料与方法:选取单纯皮肤脓肿门诊患儿26例。切开引流(I、D)后,待脓液明显减少,出现新鲜肉芽组织后,应用新型拉链装置。在干预期间跟踪伤口愈合时间和疼痛评分。采用线性回归和限制三次样条模型分析了从I和D到拉链应用的干预时间间隔与伤口愈合时间的关系。结果:平均创面愈合时间(SD)为12.73 (3.16)d。疼痛评分从使用拉链时的中位数2分显著下降到移除时的0分。线性回归分析显示,感染大小(B = 0.260, SE = 0.090, β = 0.260, t = 2.924, P = 0.008)和使用拉链的干预间隔(B = 0.850, SE = 0.090, β = 0.810, t = 9.187, P = 0.001)是2个愈合时间的预测因子。干预间隔与愈合时间呈线性剂量-反应关系(Ptotal < .001, p非线性= .406)。结论:本病例系列确定I和D后第5天为潜在阈值,建议在皮肤脓肿I和D后3天至5天使用拉链装置,以促进早期创面愈合,超过此时间延长干预间隔可延长创面愈合时间。
Use of a novel zipper device for wound closure of cutaneous abscesses in pediatric outpatients: a case series.
Background: Current management of pediatric cutaneous abscesses involves either spontaneous healing by secondary intention or suturing through tertiary intention, which are often lengthy processes that cause discomfort and distress among children. As it is noninvasive and simple, a novel zipper device is widely used for the primary wound closure of surgical incisions.
Objective: To describe the effectiveness of novel zipper device use for pediatric cutaneous abscess wound closure in an outpatient context.
Materials and methods: A total of 26 pediatric outpatients with simple cutaneous abscesses were included. After incision and drainage (I and D), the novel zipper device was applied once pus decreased significantly and fresh granulation tissue emerged. Wound healing time and pain score were tracked over the intervention period. Linear regression and restricted cubic spline models were also used to analyze the relationship between the intervention interval of time from I and D to zipper application and wound healing time.
Results: The average (SD) wound healing time was 12.73 (3.16) days. Pain scores decreased significantly from a median of 2 during zipper use to 0 at removal. Linear regression analysis revealed 2 healing time predictors: infection size (B = 0.260, SE = 0.090, β = 0.260, t = 2.924, P = .008) and intervention interval of zipper use (B = 0.850, SE = 0.090, β = 0.810, t = 9.187, P = .001). A linear dose-response relationship was observed between intervention interval and healing time (Ptotal < .001, Pnonlinear = .406).
Conclusion: This case series identifies the fifth day post-I and D as a potential threshold, and suggests that the optimal period of zipper device use is 3 days to 5 days following I and D of skin abscess to enhance early wound healing, beyond which extended intervention intervals prolong wound healing time.
期刊介绍:
Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies.
Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more.
Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.