{"title":"脉冲电磁场刺激治疗夏可足溃疡:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Norhan Mohamed Eltayeb, Marwa Mahdy Abdelhamid, Hossam Zaghloul Yousuf, Nessrein Afifi Abd-Elrashid","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Charcot foot is a debilitating complication of peripheral neuropathy and is primarily associated with diabetes, leading to structural damage, ulceration, and osteomyelitis. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy is a promising treatment modality for wound healing and bone metabolism.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of PEMF therapy in promoting bone growth and ulcer healing in patients with Charcot foot ulcers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective, single-blinded, controlled trial included 34 patients with stage 2 or 3 chronic Charcot foot with ulceration who were randomized into 2 groups. Group A (study group) received PEMF therapy in addition to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (conventional TENS), medical treatment, and standard wound care, while group B (control group) received conventional TENS and the same medical treatment and standard wound care as those in group A, 3 times per week for 3 months. Primary outcomes were assessed with plain radiographs and wound surface area tracing pre-intervention, 6 weeks post-intervention, and 12 weeks post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were evident at baseline analysis. After 6 weeks, both groups showed significant change in Charcot foot signs as well as a reduction in wound surface area (P < .05). In the study group, 23.5% of participants showed complete resolution of Charcot signs (normal appearance), 5.9% progressed to stage 2 (bone sclerosis), and 70.6% remained at stage 1. Regarding wound healing, the study group showed greater reduction in wound surface area, with a median (IQR) of 8.5 cm2 (9.4 cm2-12.2 cm2) compared with 11.5 cm2 (9.4 cm2-15.5 cm2) in the control group. By 12 weeks, 94.1% of the study group showed complete radiological resolution of Charcot signs vs 5.9% in the control group (P < .001). Median wound surface area was significantly reduced in the study group to 0.0 cm² (0.0 cm²-1.0 cm²) compared with 6.6 cm2 (5.7 cm²-7.9 cm²) in the control group (P < .05), indicating superior healing outcomes with PEMF therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PEMF therapy is an efficacious adjunctive treatment for Charcot foot ulcers, facilitating both wound healing and bone regeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"37 8","pages":"323-328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation therapy for Charcot foot ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Norhan Mohamed Eltayeb, Marwa Mahdy Abdelhamid, Hossam Zaghloul Yousuf, Nessrein Afifi Abd-Elrashid\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Charcot foot is a debilitating complication of peripheral neuropathy and is primarily associated with diabetes, leading to structural damage, ulceration, and osteomyelitis. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy is a promising treatment modality for wound healing and bone metabolism.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of PEMF therapy in promoting bone growth and ulcer healing in patients with Charcot foot ulcers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective, single-blinded, controlled trial included 34 patients with stage 2 or 3 chronic Charcot foot with ulceration who were randomized into 2 groups. Group A (study group) received PEMF therapy in addition to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (conventional TENS), medical treatment, and standard wound care, while group B (control group) received conventional TENS and the same medical treatment and standard wound care as those in group A, 3 times per week for 3 months. Primary outcomes were assessed with plain radiographs and wound surface area tracing pre-intervention, 6 weeks post-intervention, and 12 weeks post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were evident at baseline analysis. After 6 weeks, both groups showed significant change in Charcot foot signs as well as a reduction in wound surface area (P < .05). In the study group, 23.5% of participants showed complete resolution of Charcot signs (normal appearance), 5.9% progressed to stage 2 (bone sclerosis), and 70.6% remained at stage 1. Regarding wound healing, the study group showed greater reduction in wound surface area, with a median (IQR) of 8.5 cm2 (9.4 cm2-12.2 cm2) compared with 11.5 cm2 (9.4 cm2-15.5 cm2) in the control group. By 12 weeks, 94.1% of the study group showed complete radiological resolution of Charcot signs vs 5.9% in the control group (P < .001). Median wound surface area was significantly reduced in the study group to 0.0 cm² (0.0 cm²-1.0 cm²) compared with 6.6 cm2 (5.7 cm²-7.9 cm²) in the control group (P < .05), indicating superior healing outcomes with PEMF therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PEMF therapy is an efficacious adjunctive treatment for Charcot foot ulcers, facilitating both wound healing and bone regeneration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"volume\":\"37 8\",\"pages\":\"323-328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation therapy for Charcot foot ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.
Background: Charcot foot is a debilitating complication of peripheral neuropathy and is primarily associated with diabetes, leading to structural damage, ulceration, and osteomyelitis. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy is a promising treatment modality for wound healing and bone metabolism.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of PEMF therapy in promoting bone growth and ulcer healing in patients with Charcot foot ulcers.
Materials and methods: This prospective, single-blinded, controlled trial included 34 patients with stage 2 or 3 chronic Charcot foot with ulceration who were randomized into 2 groups. Group A (study group) received PEMF therapy in addition to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (conventional TENS), medical treatment, and standard wound care, while group B (control group) received conventional TENS and the same medical treatment and standard wound care as those in group A, 3 times per week for 3 months. Primary outcomes were assessed with plain radiographs and wound surface area tracing pre-intervention, 6 weeks post-intervention, and 12 weeks post-intervention.
Results: No significant differences were evident at baseline analysis. After 6 weeks, both groups showed significant change in Charcot foot signs as well as a reduction in wound surface area (P < .05). In the study group, 23.5% of participants showed complete resolution of Charcot signs (normal appearance), 5.9% progressed to stage 2 (bone sclerosis), and 70.6% remained at stage 1. Regarding wound healing, the study group showed greater reduction in wound surface area, with a median (IQR) of 8.5 cm2 (9.4 cm2-12.2 cm2) compared with 11.5 cm2 (9.4 cm2-15.5 cm2) in the control group. By 12 weeks, 94.1% of the study group showed complete radiological resolution of Charcot signs vs 5.9% in the control group (P < .001). Median wound surface area was significantly reduced in the study group to 0.0 cm² (0.0 cm²-1.0 cm²) compared with 6.6 cm2 (5.7 cm²-7.9 cm²) in the control group (P < .05), indicating superior healing outcomes with PEMF therapy.
Conclusion: PEMF therapy is an efficacious adjunctive treatment for Charcot foot ulcers, facilitating both wound healing and bone regeneration.
期刊介绍:
Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies.
Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more.
Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.