Tom Sterud, Lars-Kristian Lunde, Rigmor Berg, Karin I Proper, Fiona Aanesen
{"title":"失业和再就业对心理健康的影响:纵向研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Tom Sterud, Lars-Kristian Lunde, Rigmor Berg, Karin I Proper, Fiona Aanesen","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review examined the impact of unemployment and re-employment on mental health problems (depression, anxiety and psychological distress) among working-age adults. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO and Web of Science (January 2012-March 2024) and included studies from a prior meta-analysis (1990-2012). Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses and narrative synthesis and evaluated the certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Of 9328 search records, 38 prospective longitudinal studies met the inclusion criteria (27 from 2012-2024 and 11 from 1990-2012). A pooled standardised mean difference (SMD, Cohen's d) of 0.19 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.30, I²=88.7%) indicated increased symptom levels among the unemployed compared with those regularly employed. Similarly, pooled effect estimates indicated reduced symptoms after re-employment, with a stronger effect observed in between-group difference-in-difference analyses (SMD=-0.27, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.20, I²=40.1%) than within-group analyses (SMD=-0.19, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.10, I²=84.3%). The certainty of evidence for all outcomes based on our GRADE evaluation was low. Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that unemployment increases the risk of mental health problems, while re-employment may reduce this risk. However, due to the lack of high-certainty evidence, further longitudinal studies with multiple follow-ups are needed to strengthen causal inferences and better clarify mental health trajectories before and after re-employment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"343-353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental health effects of unemployment and re-employment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.\",\"authors\":\"Tom Sterud, Lars-Kristian Lunde, Rigmor Berg, Karin I Proper, Fiona Aanesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/oemed-2025-110194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review examined the impact of unemployment and re-employment on mental health problems (depression, anxiety and psychological distress) among working-age adults. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO and Web of Science (January 2012-March 2024) and included studies from a prior meta-analysis (1990-2012). Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses and narrative synthesis and evaluated the certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Of 9328 search records, 38 prospective longitudinal studies met the inclusion criteria (27 from 2012-2024 and 11 from 1990-2012). A pooled standardised mean difference (SMD, Cohen's d) of 0.19 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.30, I²=88.7%) indicated increased symptom levels among the unemployed compared with those regularly employed. Similarly, pooled effect estimates indicated reduced symptoms after re-employment, with a stronger effect observed in between-group difference-in-difference analyses (SMD=-0.27, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.20, I²=40.1%) than within-group analyses (SMD=-0.19, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.10, I²=84.3%). The certainty of evidence for all outcomes based on our GRADE evaluation was low. Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that unemployment increases the risk of mental health problems, while re-employment may reduce this risk. However, due to the lack of high-certainty evidence, further longitudinal studies with multiple follow-ups are needed to strengthen causal inferences and better clarify mental health trajectories before and after re-employment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"343-353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110194\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这一系统综述研究了失业和再就业对工作年龄成年人心理健康问题(抑郁、焦虑和心理困扰)的影响。我们检索了MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO和Web of Science(2012年1月- 2024年3月),并纳入了先前荟萃分析(1990-2012年)的研究。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析和叙事综合,并使用分级推荐评估、发展和评价(GRADE)来评估证据的确定性。9328项检索记录中,38项前瞻性纵向研究符合纳入标准(2012-2024年27项,1990-2012年11项)。合并标准化平均差(SMD, Cohen’s d)为0.19 (95% CI 0.08至0.30,I²=88.7%)表明失业者与正常就业者相比症状水平增加。同样,合并效应估计表明再就业后症状减轻,组间差异分析(SMD=-0.27, 95% CI -0.35至-0.20,I²=40.1%)比组内分析(SMD=-0.19, 95% CI -0.29至-0.10,I²=84.3%)观察到的效果更强。基于GRADE评价的所有结果的证据确定性都很低。我们的系统回顾和荟萃分析表明,失业增加了心理健康问题的风险,而再就业可能会降低这种风险。然而,由于缺乏高确定性的证据,需要进一步的纵向研究和多次随访,以加强因果推理,更好地阐明再就业前后的心理健康轨迹。
Mental health effects of unemployment and re-employment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.
This systematic review examined the impact of unemployment and re-employment on mental health problems (depression, anxiety and psychological distress) among working-age adults. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO and Web of Science (January 2012-March 2024) and included studies from a prior meta-analysis (1990-2012). Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses and narrative synthesis and evaluated the certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Of 9328 search records, 38 prospective longitudinal studies met the inclusion criteria (27 from 2012-2024 and 11 from 1990-2012). A pooled standardised mean difference (SMD, Cohen's d) of 0.19 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.30, I²=88.7%) indicated increased symptom levels among the unemployed compared with those regularly employed. Similarly, pooled effect estimates indicated reduced symptoms after re-employment, with a stronger effect observed in between-group difference-in-difference analyses (SMD=-0.27, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.20, I²=40.1%) than within-group analyses (SMD=-0.19, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.10, I²=84.3%). The certainty of evidence for all outcomes based on our GRADE evaluation was low. Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that unemployment increases the risk of mental health problems, while re-employment may reduce this risk. However, due to the lack of high-certainty evidence, further longitudinal studies with multiple follow-ups are needed to strengthen causal inferences and better clarify mental health trajectories before and after re-employment.
期刊介绍:
Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.