基于icp - ms的纳米颗粒表征进展:生物样品分析中的技术和挑战。

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Filip Gregar, Daniel Baron, Tomáš Pluháček
{"title":"基于icp - ms的纳米颗粒表征进展:生物样品分析中的技术和挑战。","authors":"Filip Gregar,&nbsp;Daniel Baron,&nbsp;Tomáš Pluháček","doi":"10.1002/jssc.70259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increasing use of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) in consumer and biomedical products has raised concern over their potential accumulation, transformation, and toxicity in biological systems. Accurate analytical methods are essential to detect, characterize, and quantify NPs in complex biological matrices. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) has emerged as a leading technique due to its high sensitivity, elemental selectivity, and quantitative capabilities. This review critically evaluates recent advances (from January 2020 onward) in ICP-MS-based methods for analysis of NPs in biological samples. Two main strategies are discussed: single-particle ICP-MS (spICP-MS) and hyphenated techniques coupled to ICP-MS. spICP-MS allows direct determination of particle size, concentration, and metal content at environmentally relevant levels. It is the most widely used approach and is therefore examined in greater detail, with attention to extraction procedures, particle types, sample matrices, and inherent limitations. Advances in laser ablation spICP-MS for tissue imaging and spatially resolved NPs detection are also covered. Methods using hyphenated techniques, such as hydrodynamic chromatography, size-exclusion chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, Taylor dispersion analysis, and field-flow fractionation, are increasingly employed to address limitations spICP-MS. These approaches can provide enhanced insight into particle size distributions, aggregation behavior, and interactions with complex sample matrices. This review offers a comparative evaluation of both single-particle and hyphenated methods, discussing their respective advantages and limitations. Emphasis is placed on the complementarity of these techniques and how their combined use can offer a more complete understanding of NPs’ fate in biological systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":17098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of separation science","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jssc.70259","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in ICP-MS-Based Nanoparticle Characterization: Techniques and Challenges in Biological Sample Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Filip Gregar,&nbsp;Daniel Baron,&nbsp;Tomáš Pluháček\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jssc.70259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The increasing use of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) in consumer and biomedical products has raised concern over their potential accumulation, transformation, and toxicity in biological systems. Accurate analytical methods are essential to detect, characterize, and quantify NPs in complex biological matrices. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) has emerged as a leading technique due to its high sensitivity, elemental selectivity, and quantitative capabilities. This review critically evaluates recent advances (from January 2020 onward) in ICP-MS-based methods for analysis of NPs in biological samples. Two main strategies are discussed: single-particle ICP-MS (spICP-MS) and hyphenated techniques coupled to ICP-MS. spICP-MS allows direct determination of particle size, concentration, and metal content at environmentally relevant levels. It is the most widely used approach and is therefore examined in greater detail, with attention to extraction procedures, particle types, sample matrices, and inherent limitations. Advances in laser ablation spICP-MS for tissue imaging and spatially resolved NPs detection are also covered. Methods using hyphenated techniques, such as hydrodynamic chromatography, size-exclusion chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, Taylor dispersion analysis, and field-flow fractionation, are increasingly employed to address limitations spICP-MS. These approaches can provide enhanced insight into particle size distributions, aggregation behavior, and interactions with complex sample matrices. This review offers a comparative evaluation of both single-particle and hyphenated methods, discussing their respective advantages and limitations. Emphasis is placed on the complementarity of these techniques and how their combined use can offer a more complete understanding of NPs’ fate in biological systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of separation science\",\"volume\":\"48 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jssc.70259\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of separation science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.70259\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of separation science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.70259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工程纳米颗粒(NPs)在消费者和生物医学产品中的使用越来越多,引起了人们对其在生物系统中的潜在积累、转化和毒性的关注。准确的分析方法对于检测、表征和定量复杂生物基质中的NPs至关重要。电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)因其高灵敏度、元素选择性和定量能力而成为一种领先的技术。本综述批判性地评估了生物样品中基于icp - ms的NPs分析方法的最新进展(从2020年1月起)。讨论了两种主要策略:单粒子ICP-MS (spICP-MS)和与ICP-MS耦合的连字符技术。spICP-MS允许在环境相关水平上直接测定颗粒大小,浓度和金属含量。它是最广泛使用的方法,因此更详细地检查,注意提取程序,颗粒类型,样品矩阵和固有的局限性。介绍了激光消融spICP-MS用于组织成像和空间分辨NPs检测的进展。水动力色谱、粒径排除色谱、毛细管电泳、泰勒分散分析和场流分馏等联用技术被越来越多地用于解决icp - ms的局限性。这些方法可以提供增强的洞察粒度分布,聚集行为,并与复杂的样品矩阵的相互作用。本文对单粒子法和连字符法进行了比较评价,讨论了它们各自的优点和局限性。重点放在这些技术的互补性以及它们的联合使用如何提供对生物系统中NPs命运的更完整理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Advances in ICP-MS-Based Nanoparticle Characterization: Techniques and Challenges in Biological Sample Analysis

Advances in ICP-MS-Based Nanoparticle Characterization: Techniques and Challenges in Biological Sample Analysis

Advances in ICP-MS-Based Nanoparticle Characterization: Techniques and Challenges in Biological Sample Analysis

Advances in ICP-MS-Based Nanoparticle Characterization: Techniques and Challenges in Biological Sample Analysis

Advances in ICP-MS-Based Nanoparticle Characterization: Techniques and Challenges in Biological Sample Analysis

Advances in ICP-MS-Based Nanoparticle Characterization: Techniques and Challenges in Biological Sample Analysis

The increasing use of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) in consumer and biomedical products has raised concern over their potential accumulation, transformation, and toxicity in biological systems. Accurate analytical methods are essential to detect, characterize, and quantify NPs in complex biological matrices. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) has emerged as a leading technique due to its high sensitivity, elemental selectivity, and quantitative capabilities. This review critically evaluates recent advances (from January 2020 onward) in ICP-MS-based methods for analysis of NPs in biological samples. Two main strategies are discussed: single-particle ICP-MS (spICP-MS) and hyphenated techniques coupled to ICP-MS. spICP-MS allows direct determination of particle size, concentration, and metal content at environmentally relevant levels. It is the most widely used approach and is therefore examined in greater detail, with attention to extraction procedures, particle types, sample matrices, and inherent limitations. Advances in laser ablation spICP-MS for tissue imaging and spatially resolved NPs detection are also covered. Methods using hyphenated techniques, such as hydrodynamic chromatography, size-exclusion chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, Taylor dispersion analysis, and field-flow fractionation, are increasingly employed to address limitations spICP-MS. These approaches can provide enhanced insight into particle size distributions, aggregation behavior, and interactions with complex sample matrices. This review offers a comparative evaluation of both single-particle and hyphenated methods, discussing their respective advantages and limitations. Emphasis is placed on the complementarity of these techniques and how their combined use can offer a more complete understanding of NPs’ fate in biological systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of separation science
Journal of separation science 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
408
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Separation Science (JSS) is the most comprehensive source in separation science, since it covers all areas of chromatographic and electrophoretic separation methods in theory and practice, both in the analytical and in the preparative mode, solid phase extraction, sample preparation, and related techniques. Manuscripts on methodological or instrumental developments, including detection aspects, in particular mass spectrometry, as well as on innovative applications will also be published. Manuscripts on hyphenation, automation, and miniaturization are particularly welcome. Pre- and post-separation facets of a total analysis may be covered as well as the underlying logic of the development or application of a method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信