Giovanni Rubegni, Mario Fruschelli, Lorenzo Mensi, Martina Mugnai, Tommaso Padula, Alessandro Avitabile, Gian Marco Tosi
{"title":"新型3d打印同轴光学显微镜适配器眼科湿实验室。","authors":"Giovanni Rubegni, Mario Fruschelli, Lorenzo Mensi, Martina Mugnai, Tommaso Padula, Alessandro Avitabile, Gian Marco Tosi","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the usability and training effectiveness of a 3D-printed coaxial illumination system mounted on an off-the-shelf stereo-microscope to a professional ophthalmic surgical microscope, in cataract surgery simulation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ophthalmology Lab, Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomized crossover study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty ophthalmology residents performed simulated cataract surgery steps, including corneal incisions, capsulorhexis, hydrodissection, and corneal suturing, on porcine eyes using an off-the-shelf stereo-microscope and a Zeiss OPMI Lumera 700. The stereo microscope was equipped with a 3D-printed coaxial light adapter. After each simulation, participants completed a 5-item evaluation questionnaire (5-point Likert scale) and the System Usability Scale (SUS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Zeiss microscope received significantly higher scores for image quality (4.15 vs. 3.40, p < 0.001) and red reflex visibility (4.10 vs. 3.25, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in depth perception, ergonomics, or ease of instrument handling. The stereo microscope scored higher in the SUS (80.5 ± 5.48 vs. 66.6 ± 4.95, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified stereo microscope with 3D-printed coaxial illumination represents a cost-effective alternative for ophthalmic wet lab training. Despite lower optical performance, its usability and affordability make it a valuable tool for simulation-based education, particularly in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel 3d-printed Coaxial Light Microscope Adapter for Ophthalmic Wet Lab.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Rubegni, Mario Fruschelli, Lorenzo Mensi, Martina Mugnai, Tommaso Padula, Alessandro Avitabile, Gian Marco Tosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the usability and training effectiveness of a 3D-printed coaxial illumination system mounted on an off-the-shelf stereo-microscope to a professional ophthalmic surgical microscope, in cataract surgery simulation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ophthalmology Lab, Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomized crossover study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty ophthalmology residents performed simulated cataract surgery steps, including corneal incisions, capsulorhexis, hydrodissection, and corneal suturing, on porcine eyes using an off-the-shelf stereo-microscope and a Zeiss OPMI Lumera 700. The stereo microscope was equipped with a 3D-printed coaxial light adapter. After each simulation, participants completed a 5-item evaluation questionnaire (5-point Likert scale) and the System Usability Scale (SUS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Zeiss microscope received significantly higher scores for image quality (4.15 vs. 3.40, p < 0.001) and red reflex visibility (4.10 vs. 3.25, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in depth perception, ergonomics, or ease of instrument handling. The stereo microscope scored higher in the SUS (80.5 ± 5.48 vs. 66.6 ± 4.95, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified stereo microscope with 3D-printed coaxial illumination represents a cost-effective alternative for ophthalmic wet lab training. Despite lower optical performance, its usability and affordability make it a valuable tool for simulation-based education, particularly in low-resource settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001782\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Novel 3d-printed Coaxial Light Microscope Adapter for Ophthalmic Wet Lab.
Purpose: To compare the usability and training effectiveness of a 3D-printed coaxial illumination system mounted on an off-the-shelf stereo-microscope to a professional ophthalmic surgical microscope, in cataract surgery simulation.
Setting: Ophthalmology Lab, Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Design: Prospective randomized crossover study.
Methods: Twenty ophthalmology residents performed simulated cataract surgery steps, including corneal incisions, capsulorhexis, hydrodissection, and corneal suturing, on porcine eyes using an off-the-shelf stereo-microscope and a Zeiss OPMI Lumera 700. The stereo microscope was equipped with a 3D-printed coaxial light adapter. After each simulation, participants completed a 5-item evaluation questionnaire (5-point Likert scale) and the System Usability Scale (SUS).
Results: The Zeiss microscope received significantly higher scores for image quality (4.15 vs. 3.40, p < 0.001) and red reflex visibility (4.10 vs. 3.25, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in depth perception, ergonomics, or ease of instrument handling. The stereo microscope scored higher in the SUS (80.5 ± 5.48 vs. 66.6 ± 4.95, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The modified stereo microscope with 3D-printed coaxial illumination represents a cost-effective alternative for ophthalmic wet lab training. Despite lower optical performance, its usability and affordability make it a valuable tool for simulation-based education, particularly in low-resource settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS).
JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.