观察者梦:标准和频率。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Darren M Lipnicki
{"title":"观察者梦:标准和频率。","authors":"Darren M Lipnicki","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous theories of dreaming consider embodied self-representation and participation in dream events as key features. However, past studies suggest that the dream self is absent or an uninvolved observer in over 10% of adult REM dreams. Further, these dreams can be similarly elaborate and of comparable narrative structure to participatory dreams. The current study presents new criteria for observer dreams informed and illustrated by reports from adult dream series. Three types of observer status are described: (I) no embodied self-representation, (II) an essentially disembodied self that sees events from within the dream environment, and (III) an embodied self that observes events virtually, often on TV. All types require observation of events or an activity with dynamic flow. The new criteria are used to determine observer dream frequencies in the dream reports from Hall and Van de Castle's 1963-1964 University of Miami study. The overall percentage of observer dreams in the Miami reports was 13.1%, and Type I was the most frequent (8.0% of all reports). Past studies show that observer dreams are more frequent in children and older adults than in young adults. An exploratory investigation of age differences in the current study was consistent with this, suggesting a rise in observer dreams from young adulthood. Additionally, direct physical aggression was found in around 20% of observer dreams, with potential implications for the threat simulation hypothesis of dream function. This study's findings suggest that observer dreams warrant greater consideration, including integration into theories of dreaming.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observer Dreams: Criteria and Frequency.\",\"authors\":\"Darren M Lipnicki\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsr.70201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Numerous theories of dreaming consider embodied self-representation and participation in dream events as key features. However, past studies suggest that the dream self is absent or an uninvolved observer in over 10% of adult REM dreams. Further, these dreams can be similarly elaborate and of comparable narrative structure to participatory dreams. The current study presents new criteria for observer dreams informed and illustrated by reports from adult dream series. Three types of observer status are described: (I) no embodied self-representation, (II) an essentially disembodied self that sees events from within the dream environment, and (III) an embodied self that observes events virtually, often on TV. All types require observation of events or an activity with dynamic flow. The new criteria are used to determine observer dream frequencies in the dream reports from Hall and Van de Castle's 1963-1964 University of Miami study. The overall percentage of observer dreams in the Miami reports was 13.1%, and Type I was the most frequent (8.0% of all reports). Past studies show that observer dreams are more frequent in children and older adults than in young adults. An exploratory investigation of age differences in the current study was consistent with this, suggesting a rise in observer dreams from young adulthood. Additionally, direct physical aggression was found in around 20% of observer dreams, with potential implications for the threat simulation hypothesis of dream function. This study's findings suggest that observer dreams warrant greater consideration, including integration into theories of dreaming.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70201\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多关于做梦的理论都认为具体化的自我表征和梦境活动的参与是关键特征。然而,过去的研究表明,在超过10%的成人快速眼动梦中,梦的自我是缺席的,或者是一个不参与的观察者。此外,这些梦可能与参与性梦一样复杂,具有类似的叙事结构。目前的研究提出了观察者梦的新标准,并由成人梦系列报告提供了信息和说明。本文描述了三种类型的观察者状态:(I)没有具身的自我表征,(II)本质上没有具身的自我,从梦境环境中看到事件,(III)有具身的自我,以虚拟的方式观察事件,通常是在电视上。所有类型都需要观察具有动态流的事件或活动。霍尔和范·德·卡斯尔1963年至1964年在迈阿密大学进行的研究报告中,新的标准被用来确定观察者的梦境频率。迈阿密报告中观察者梦的总体百分比为13.1%,其中类型I最常见(占所有报告的8.0%)。过去的研究表明,观察者梦在儿童和老年人中比在年轻人中更频繁。在目前的研究中,一项关于年龄差异的探索性调查与此一致,表明从年轻的成年期开始,观察者的梦就会增加。此外,大约20%的观察者的梦中发现了直接的身体攻击,这对梦功能的威胁模拟假设有潜在的影响。这项研究的结果表明,观察者的梦需要更多的考虑,包括整合到做梦的理论中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Observer Dreams: Criteria and Frequency.

Numerous theories of dreaming consider embodied self-representation and participation in dream events as key features. However, past studies suggest that the dream self is absent or an uninvolved observer in over 10% of adult REM dreams. Further, these dreams can be similarly elaborate and of comparable narrative structure to participatory dreams. The current study presents new criteria for observer dreams informed and illustrated by reports from adult dream series. Three types of observer status are described: (I) no embodied self-representation, (II) an essentially disembodied self that sees events from within the dream environment, and (III) an embodied self that observes events virtually, often on TV. All types require observation of events or an activity with dynamic flow. The new criteria are used to determine observer dream frequencies in the dream reports from Hall and Van de Castle's 1963-1964 University of Miami study. The overall percentage of observer dreams in the Miami reports was 13.1%, and Type I was the most frequent (8.0% of all reports). Past studies show that observer dreams are more frequent in children and older adults than in young adults. An exploratory investigation of age differences in the current study was consistent with this, suggesting a rise in observer dreams from young adulthood. Additionally, direct physical aggression was found in around 20% of observer dreams, with potential implications for the threat simulation hypothesis of dream function. This study's findings suggest that observer dreams warrant greater consideration, including integration into theories of dreaming.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信