髂筋膜-坐骨神经联合阻滞可减少慢性肢体缺血患者早期心血管事件:一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Manman Liu, Wanxia Xiong, Jie Liu, Biling Wu, Youwen Chen, Yuejiao Song, Xiaoru Lin, Ming Ding, Chao Liang
{"title":"髂筋膜-坐骨神经联合阻滞可减少慢性肢体缺血患者早期心血管事件:一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性研究。","authors":"Manman Liu, Wanxia Xiong, Jie Liu, Biling Wu, Youwen Chen, Yuejiao Song, Xiaoru Lin, Ming Ding, Chao Liang","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare postoperative outcomes between combined fascia iliaca compartment-sciatic nerve blockade (FICB-SNB) and monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing lower-extremity revascularization (LER).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective matched cohort study (1:1 propensity score matching).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-center analysis of CLTI patients undergoing LER.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>216 matched pairs (total n = 432) selected from 505 eligible patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>FICB-SNB (n = 216) versus MAC (n= 216).</p><p><strong>Measurements & main results: </strong>Primary outcomes: Compared to MAC, FICB-SNB did not significantly reduce in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-1.32; p = 0.15) or 1-year MACE (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>FICB-SNB demonstrated superior postoperative analgesia, reducing rest pain by 67% (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23-0.48; p < 0.001). No differences were observed in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, complications, or amputation rates (p > 0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FICB-SNB improves analgesia but does not significantly reduce short- or long-term MACE. The trend toward lower in-hospital MACE suggests transient intraoperative cardiovascular stabilization not sustained at 1 year. A prospective randomized trial with standardized protocols to control confounders and validate clinical trends is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined Fascia Iliaca Compartment-Sciatic Nerve Blocks Reduce Early Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Manman Liu, Wanxia Xiong, Jie Liu, Biling Wu, Youwen Chen, Yuejiao Song, Xiaoru Lin, Ming Ding, Chao Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare postoperative outcomes between combined fascia iliaca compartment-sciatic nerve blockade (FICB-SNB) and monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing lower-extremity revascularization (LER).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective matched cohort study (1:1 propensity score matching).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-center analysis of CLTI patients undergoing LER.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>216 matched pairs (total n = 432) selected from 505 eligible patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>FICB-SNB (n = 216) versus MAC (n= 216).</p><p><strong>Measurements & main results: </strong>Primary outcomes: Compared to MAC, FICB-SNB did not significantly reduce in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-1.32; p = 0.15) or 1-year MACE (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>FICB-SNB demonstrated superior postoperative analgesia, reducing rest pain by 67% (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23-0.48; p < 0.001). No differences were observed in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, complications, or amputation rates (p > 0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FICB-SNB improves analgesia but does not significantly reduce short- or long-term MACE. The trend toward lower in-hospital MACE suggests transient intraoperative cardiovascular stabilization not sustained at 1 year. A prospective randomized trial with standardized protocols to control confounders and validate clinical trends is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较髂筋膜间室-坐骨神经联合阻滞(FICB-SNB)和监护麻醉护理(MAC)在慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)患者行下肢血运重建术(LER)的术后效果。设计:回顾性匹配队列研究(1:1倾向评分匹配)。背景:接受LER治疗的CLTI患者的单中心分析。参与者:从505例符合条件的患者中选择216对配对(总n = 432)。干预措施:FICB-SNB (n= 216)与MAC (n= 216)。测量和主要结果:主要结局:与MAC相比,FICB-SNB没有显著降低院内主要不良心血管事件(MACE)(优势比[OR], 0.49; 95%可信区间[CI], 0.18-1.32; p = 0.15)或1年MACE (p < 0.05)。次要结局:FICB-SNB显示出良好的术后镇痛效果,使静息痛减少67% (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23-0.48; p < 0.001)。非心脏手术后心肌损伤、并发症或截肢率均无差异(p < 0.05)。结论:FICB-SNB可改善镇痛,但不能显著降低短期或长期MACE。较低的住院MACE趋势表明术中短暂的心血管稳定不能持续1年。有必要进行一项具有标准化方案的前瞻性随机试验,以控制混杂因素并验证临床趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined Fascia Iliaca Compartment-Sciatic Nerve Blocks Reduce Early Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Study.

Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes between combined fascia iliaca compartment-sciatic nerve blockade (FICB-SNB) and monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing lower-extremity revascularization (LER).

Design: Retrospective matched cohort study (1:1 propensity score matching).

Setting: Single-center analysis of CLTI patients undergoing LER.

Participants: 216 matched pairs (total n = 432) selected from 505 eligible patients.

Interventions: FICB-SNB (n = 216) versus MAC (n= 216).

Measurements & main results: Primary outcomes: Compared to MAC, FICB-SNB did not significantly reduce in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-1.32; p = 0.15) or 1-year MACE (p > 0.05).

Secondary outcomes: FICB-SNB demonstrated superior postoperative analgesia, reducing rest pain by 67% (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23-0.48; p < 0.001). No differences were observed in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, complications, or amputation rates (p > 0.05 for all).

Conclusions: FICB-SNB improves analgesia but does not significantly reduce short- or long-term MACE. The trend toward lower in-hospital MACE suggests transient intraoperative cardiovascular stabilization not sustained at 1 year. A prospective randomized trial with standardized protocols to control confounders and validate clinical trends is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信