一年级本科生在护理和获得大学心理健康支持服务方面的感知障碍:来自U-Flourish研究的发现。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Madeleine Dale, Anne Duffy, Nathan King, Kate Saunders, Kevin Matlock
{"title":"一年级本科生在护理和获得大学心理健康支持服务方面的感知障碍:来自U-Flourish研究的发现。","authors":"Madeleine Dale, Anne Duffy, Nathan King, Kate Saunders, Kevin Matlock","doi":"10.1080/07448481.2025.2555594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many students who need mental health support do not receive it. We examined associations between perceived barriers and university mental health service access. Participants: First-year Oxford University undergraduates (<i>n</i> = 443) with unmet mental health needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Logistic regression tested which perceived practical, attitudinal, and stigma-related barriers predicted service use. Subgroup analyses targeted screen-positives for anxiety (GAD-7) and/or depression (PHQ-9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reduced service use was linked to attitudinal barriers, minimizing problems (OR = 0.64; CI = 0.42-0.98) and difficulty discussing problems (OR = 0.59; CI = 0.38-0.91), especially among screen positives for the latter (OR = 0.49; CI = 0.27-0.89); practical barriers, uncertainty about how to get help (OR = 0.64; CI = 0.42-0.97) and time limitations (OR = 0.66; CI = 0.44-0.98), especially in screen-positives for both (OR = 0.46; CI = 0.26-0.79; OR = 0.47; CI = 0.27-0.79); and stigma-related barriers, feeling ashamed (OR = 0.63; CI = 0.40-0.98), appearing weak (OR = 0.65; CI = 0.42-0.98), and friends' reactions (OR = 0.58; CI = 0.38-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple perceived barriers were associated with a reduced likelihood of accessing university mental health services. Developing mental health literacy and streamlined pathways may improve timely support access for students with unmet needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American College Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived barriers to care and access to university mental health support services among first-year undergraduates: findings from the U-Flourish study.\",\"authors\":\"Madeleine Dale, Anne Duffy, Nathan King, Kate Saunders, Kevin Matlock\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07448481.2025.2555594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many students who need mental health support do not receive it. We examined associations between perceived barriers and university mental health service access. Participants: First-year Oxford University undergraduates (<i>n</i> = 443) with unmet mental health needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Logistic regression tested which perceived practical, attitudinal, and stigma-related barriers predicted service use. Subgroup analyses targeted screen-positives for anxiety (GAD-7) and/or depression (PHQ-9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reduced service use was linked to attitudinal barriers, minimizing problems (OR = 0.64; CI = 0.42-0.98) and difficulty discussing problems (OR = 0.59; CI = 0.38-0.91), especially among screen positives for the latter (OR = 0.49; CI = 0.27-0.89); practical barriers, uncertainty about how to get help (OR = 0.64; CI = 0.42-0.97) and time limitations (OR = 0.66; CI = 0.44-0.98), especially in screen-positives for both (OR = 0.46; CI = 0.26-0.79; OR = 0.47; CI = 0.27-0.79); and stigma-related barriers, feeling ashamed (OR = 0.63; CI = 0.40-0.98), appearing weak (OR = 0.65; CI = 0.42-0.98), and friends' reactions (OR = 0.58; CI = 0.38-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple perceived barriers were associated with a reduced likelihood of accessing university mental health services. Developing mental health literacy and streamlined pathways may improve timely support access for students with unmet needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of American College Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of American College Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2025.2555594\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American College Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2025.2555594","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:许多需要心理健康支持的学生没有得到支持。我们研究了感知障碍与大学心理健康服务获取之间的关系。参与者:未满足心理健康需求的牛津大学一年级本科生(n = 443)。方法:采用Logistic回归检验感知实践障碍、态度障碍和耻辱感障碍对服务使用的预测作用。亚组分析针对焦虑(GAD-7)和/或抑郁(PHQ-9)筛查阳性的患者。结果:减少服务使用与态度障碍、最小化问题(OR = 0.64; CI = 0.42-0.98)和难以讨论问题(OR = 0.59; CI = 0.38-0.91)有关,尤其是后者的筛查阳性(OR = 0.49; CI = 0.27-0.89);实际障碍,不确定如何获得帮助(OR = 0.64; CI = 0.42-0.97)和时间限制(OR = 0.66; CI = 0.44-0.98),特别是在筛查阳性的情况下(OR = 0.46; CI = 0.26-0.79; OR = 0.47; CI = 0.27-0.79);与羞耻感相关的障碍,感到羞耻(OR = 0.63; CI = 0.40-0.98),表现虚弱(OR = 0.65; CI = 0.42-0.98),以及朋友的反应(OR = 0.58; CI = 0.38-0.88)。结论:多重感知障碍与获得大学心理健康服务的可能性降低有关。发展心理健康素养和简化途径可以改善对需求未得到满足的学生的及时支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived barriers to care and access to university mental health support services among first-year undergraduates: findings from the U-Flourish study.

Objective: Many students who need mental health support do not receive it. We examined associations between perceived barriers and university mental health service access. Participants: First-year Oxford University undergraduates (n = 443) with unmet mental health needs.

Methods: Logistic regression tested which perceived practical, attitudinal, and stigma-related barriers predicted service use. Subgroup analyses targeted screen-positives for anxiety (GAD-7) and/or depression (PHQ-9).

Results: Reduced service use was linked to attitudinal barriers, minimizing problems (OR = 0.64; CI = 0.42-0.98) and difficulty discussing problems (OR = 0.59; CI = 0.38-0.91), especially among screen positives for the latter (OR = 0.49; CI = 0.27-0.89); practical barriers, uncertainty about how to get help (OR = 0.64; CI = 0.42-0.97) and time limitations (OR = 0.66; CI = 0.44-0.98), especially in screen-positives for both (OR = 0.46; CI = 0.26-0.79; OR = 0.47; CI = 0.27-0.79); and stigma-related barriers, feeling ashamed (OR = 0.63; CI = 0.40-0.98), appearing weak (OR = 0.65; CI = 0.42-0.98), and friends' reactions (OR = 0.58; CI = 0.38-0.88).

Conclusions: Multiple perceived barriers were associated with a reduced likelihood of accessing university mental health services. Developing mental health literacy and streamlined pathways may improve timely support access for students with unmet needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
388
期刊介绍: Binge drinking, campus violence, eating disorders, sexual harassment: Today"s college students face challenges their parents never imagined. The Journal of American College Health, the only scholarly publication devoted entirely to college students" health, focuses on these issues, as well as use of tobacco and other drugs, sexual habits, psychological problems, and guns on campus, as well as the students... Published in cooperation with the American College Health Association, the Journal of American College Health is a must read for physicians, nurses, health educators, and administrators who are involved with students every day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信