父母抽噎问卷中文翻译的临床验证。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Qinyu Li, Yingying Cai, Rong Chen, Duan Lin, Jiqiang Xie, Yanting Lu, Yajun Tang, Xiumei Liu
{"title":"父母抽噎问卷中文翻译的临床验证。","authors":"Qinyu Li, Yingying Cai, Rong Chen, Duan Lin, Jiqiang Xie, Yanting Lu, Yajun Tang, Xiumei Liu","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2025.2553313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS), although extensively utilised in China for evaluating tic disorders (TD), relies exclusively on clinician-administered assessments. At present, no parent-report instruments validated in the Chinese context are available for assessing tics. The Parent Tic Questionnaire (PTQ), originally developed as the first parent-rated tool for TD symptom evaluation, has yet to undergo validation in any Asian language.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 414 children and adolescents aged 2-16 years with a TD diagnosis were recruited. The PTQ, YGTSS, Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-48) and Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) were administered to examine the psychometric characteristics of the PTQ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the PTQ motor, vocal and total tic subscales were 0.789, 0.821 and 0.849, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. Strong correlations were observed between PTQ total scores and YGTSS scores. A cut-off score of 14 on the PTQ emerged as the most appropriate threshold for differentiating between mild and moderate TD. The content validity index further demonstrated high validity for the Chinese PTQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The validated Chinese version of the PTQ exhibits robust psychometric properties and provides clinically informative metrics for tic severity stratification, establishing a foundation for score standardisation in routine assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical validation of a Chinese translation of the parent tic questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Qinyu Li, Yingying Cai, Rong Chen, Duan Lin, Jiqiang Xie, Yanting Lu, Yajun Tang, Xiumei Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13651501.2025.2553313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS), although extensively utilised in China for evaluating tic disorders (TD), relies exclusively on clinician-administered assessments. At present, no parent-report instruments validated in the Chinese context are available for assessing tics. The Parent Tic Questionnaire (PTQ), originally developed as the first parent-rated tool for TD symptom evaluation, has yet to undergo validation in any Asian language.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 414 children and adolescents aged 2-16 years with a TD diagnosis were recruited. The PTQ, YGTSS, Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-48) and Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) were administered to examine the psychometric characteristics of the PTQ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the PTQ motor, vocal and total tic subscales were 0.789, 0.821 and 0.849, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. Strong correlations were observed between PTQ total scores and YGTSS scores. A cut-off score of 14 on the PTQ emerged as the most appropriate threshold for differentiating between mild and moderate TD. The content validity index further demonstrated high validity for the Chinese PTQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The validated Chinese version of the PTQ exhibits robust psychometric properties and provides clinically informative metrics for tic severity stratification, establishing a foundation for score standardisation in routine assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2025.2553313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2025.2553313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:耶鲁全球抽动严重程度量表(YGTSS),虽然在中国广泛用于评估抽动障碍(TD),但完全依赖于临床管理的评估。目前,没有在中国背景下验证的家长报告工具可用于评估抽搐。父母Tic问卷(PTQ)最初是作为TD症状评估的第一个父母评分工具而开发的,但尚未在任何亚洲语言中进行验证。方法:共招募了414名年龄在2-16岁的诊断为TD的儿童和青少年。采用PTQ、YGTSS、Conners父母评定量表(CPRS-48)和儿童Yale-Brown强迫症量表(CY-BOCS)检测PTQ的心理测量特征。结果:PTQ运动分量表、声音分量表和总抽动分量表的Cronbach’s alpha系数分别为0.789、0.821和0.849,内部一致性良好。PTQ总分与YGTSS评分有较强的相关性。PTQ的截止分数为14分,是区分轻度和中度TD的最合适阈值。内容效度指标进一步证明了中文PTQ的高效度。结论:经验证的中文版PTQ具有强大的心理测量特性,并为抽动严重程度分层提供了临床信息指标,为常规评估的评分标准化奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical validation of a Chinese translation of the parent tic questionnaire.

Background: The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS), although extensively utilised in China for evaluating tic disorders (TD), relies exclusively on clinician-administered assessments. At present, no parent-report instruments validated in the Chinese context are available for assessing tics. The Parent Tic Questionnaire (PTQ), originally developed as the first parent-rated tool for TD symptom evaluation, has yet to undergo validation in any Asian language.

Methods: A total of 414 children and adolescents aged 2-16 years with a TD diagnosis were recruited. The PTQ, YGTSS, Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-48) and Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) were administered to examine the psychometric characteristics of the PTQ.

Results: Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the PTQ motor, vocal and total tic subscales were 0.789, 0.821 and 0.849, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. Strong correlations were observed between PTQ total scores and YGTSS scores. A cut-off score of 14 on the PTQ emerged as the most appropriate threshold for differentiating between mild and moderate TD. The content validity index further demonstrated high validity for the Chinese PTQ.

Conclusions: The validated Chinese version of the PTQ exhibits robust psychometric properties and provides clinically informative metrics for tic severity stratification, establishing a foundation for score standardisation in routine assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry. The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice. Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients. Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician. Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications. Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信