[食品不安全感知量表的验证过程和方法学特征:范围审查]。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ciencia & saude coletiva Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1590/1413-81232025308.14692023
Jamila da Silva Sultane Aboobacar, Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini, Dayane de Castro Morais, Elizangela da Silva Miguel, Francilene Maria Azevedo, Aline Carare Candido, Silvia Eloiza Priore
{"title":"[食品不安全感知量表的验证过程和方法学特征:范围审查]。","authors":"Jamila da Silva Sultane Aboobacar, Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini, Dayane de Castro Morais, Elizangela da Silva Miguel, Francilene Maria Azevedo, Aline Carare Candido, Silvia Eloiza Priore","doi":"10.1590/1413-81232025308.14692023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this scoping review was to identify the validation process and the methodological characteristics of food insecurity perception scales in different parts of the world. A search was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, Scielo, Medline, Lilacs and Google Scholar databases, in addition to the gray literature. The pre-selection of studies took place by reading the titles and abstracts, followed by reading in full. Of the 828 studies identified, 19 were selected referring to 21 country scales: Colombia; Tanzania; Lebanon; New Zealand; U.S; Ecuador; Sir Lanka; Brazil; Guatemala; Dominican Republic; Haiti; Costa Rica; Venezuela; Mexico; Bolivia; Burkina Faso and the Philippines, as well as the Latin American and Caribbean Scale (ELCSA) and the FAO. Colombia and Ecuador presented two validated scales. The scales varied in relation to the year of validation, reference time, number of questions and types of households. The validation processes involved qualitative and quantitative phases. Internal validation was performed using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient and the Rasch model; and the external validation by association and/or correlation with socioeconomic and food consumption variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":10195,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","volume":"30 8","pages":"e14692023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Validation process and methodological characteristics of food insecurity perception scales: a scoping review].\",\"authors\":\"Jamila da Silva Sultane Aboobacar, Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini, Dayane de Castro Morais, Elizangela da Silva Miguel, Francilene Maria Azevedo, Aline Carare Candido, Silvia Eloiza Priore\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-81232025308.14692023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this scoping review was to identify the validation process and the methodological characteristics of food insecurity perception scales in different parts of the world. A search was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, Scielo, Medline, Lilacs and Google Scholar databases, in addition to the gray literature. The pre-selection of studies took place by reading the titles and abstracts, followed by reading in full. Of the 828 studies identified, 19 were selected referring to 21 country scales: Colombia; Tanzania; Lebanon; New Zealand; U.S; Ecuador; Sir Lanka; Brazil; Guatemala; Dominican Republic; Haiti; Costa Rica; Venezuela; Mexico; Bolivia; Burkina Faso and the Philippines, as well as the Latin American and Caribbean Scale (ELCSA) and the FAO. Colombia and Ecuador presented two validated scales. The scales varied in relation to the year of validation, reference time, number of questions and types of households. The validation processes involved qualitative and quantitative phases. Internal validation was performed using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient and the Rasch model; and the external validation by association and/or correlation with socioeconomic and food consumption variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciencia & saude coletiva\",\"volume\":\"30 8\",\"pages\":\"e14692023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciencia & saude coletiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232025308.14692023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232025308.14692023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本次范围审查的目的是确定世界不同地区粮食不安全感知量表的验证过程和方法学特征。检索PubMed、Embase、Scielo、Medline、Lilacs和谷歌Scholar数据库,以及灰色文献。研究的预选是通过阅读标题和摘要进行的,然后是全文阅读。在确定的828项研究中,根据21个国家的规模选择了19项研究:哥伦比亚;坦桑尼亚;黎巴嫩;新西兰;美国;厄瓜多尔;斯里兰卡;巴西;危地马拉;多米尼加共和国;海地;哥斯达黎加;委内瑞拉;墨西哥;玻利维亚;布基纳法索和菲律宾,以及拉丁美洲和加勒比规模(ELCSA)和粮农组织。哥伦比亚和厄瓜多尔提出了两种有效的比额表。量表因生效年份、参考时间、问题数量和家庭类型而异。验证过程包括定性和定量两个阶段。采用Cronbach’s Alpha系数和Rasch模型进行内部验证;通过社会经济和食品消费变量的关联和/或相关性进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Validation process and methodological characteristics of food insecurity perception scales: a scoping review].

The objective of this scoping review was to identify the validation process and the methodological characteristics of food insecurity perception scales in different parts of the world. A search was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, Scielo, Medline, Lilacs and Google Scholar databases, in addition to the gray literature. The pre-selection of studies took place by reading the titles and abstracts, followed by reading in full. Of the 828 studies identified, 19 were selected referring to 21 country scales: Colombia; Tanzania; Lebanon; New Zealand; U.S; Ecuador; Sir Lanka; Brazil; Guatemala; Dominican Republic; Haiti; Costa Rica; Venezuela; Mexico; Bolivia; Burkina Faso and the Philippines, as well as the Latin American and Caribbean Scale (ELCSA) and the FAO. Colombia and Ecuador presented two validated scales. The scales varied in relation to the year of validation, reference time, number of questions and types of households. The validation processes involved qualitative and quantitative phases. Internal validation was performed using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient and the Rasch model; and the external validation by association and/or correlation with socioeconomic and food consumption variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ciencia & saude coletiva
Ciencia & saude coletiva PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
533
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva publishes debates, analyses, and results of research on a Specific Theme considered current and relevant to the field of Collective Health. Its abbreviated title is Ciênc. saúde coletiva, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信