确定母乳喂养友好城市的核心指标:德尔菲研究。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
May Loong Tan, Siew Cheng Foong, Wai Cheng Foong, Grace Y W Tay, Jacqueline J Ho, Amal Omer-Salim, Elizabeth J O'Sullivan, Fionnuala M McAuliffe
{"title":"确定母乳喂养友好城市的核心指标:德尔菲研究。","authors":"May Loong Tan, Siew Cheng Foong, Wai Cheng Foong, Grace Y W Tay, Jacqueline J Ho, Amal Omer-Salim, Elizabeth J O'Sullivan, Fionnuala M McAuliffe","doi":"10.1177/15568253251376671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> A breastfeeding-friendly city is one with a synchronous and enabling environment for breastfeeding. A scoping review and interviews with breastfeeding mothers identified numerous potential indicators of a breastfeeding-friendly city. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To determine a set of indicators of a breastfeeding-friendly city through consensus. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A modified two-round online Delphi survey was conducted with three stakeholder groups-experts, policymakers, and families. In Round 1, participants rated 52 potential indicators identified from earlier studies. They were asked to also suggest additional indicators. In Round 2, participants were shown the ratings of the other participants from Round 1 and asked to rate the items again with the choice of changing their original ratings. Consensus was defined as more than 70% of participants rating an item as critical (rating of 7-9) or not important (rating of 1-3). Items without consensus were discussed in a final consensus meeting. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 107 participants from 14 countries completed the survey. After both rounds, 50 of 56 items reached consensus. Following the consensus meeting, a final list of 52 indicators was agreed upon. These were grouped into five sectors: city administration (e.g., policy, leadership, budget), community (e.g., peer support, breastfeeding rooms), health care (e.g., hospital, clinic, pharmacy), workplace (e.g., time, space), and collaboration. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Using a systematic approach, we identified a comprehensive list of indicators that reflect the warm chain. These indicators offer cities a practical framework for evaluating and strengthening breastfeeding-friendly environments, with the potential to improve global breastfeeding outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying the Core Indicators of a Breastfeeding-Friendly City: A Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"May Loong Tan, Siew Cheng Foong, Wai Cheng Foong, Grace Y W Tay, Jacqueline J Ho, Amal Omer-Salim, Elizabeth J O'Sullivan, Fionnuala M McAuliffe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15568253251376671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> A breastfeeding-friendly city is one with a synchronous and enabling environment for breastfeeding. A scoping review and interviews with breastfeeding mothers identified numerous potential indicators of a breastfeeding-friendly city. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To determine a set of indicators of a breastfeeding-friendly city through consensus. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A modified two-round online Delphi survey was conducted with three stakeholder groups-experts, policymakers, and families. In Round 1, participants rated 52 potential indicators identified from earlier studies. They were asked to also suggest additional indicators. In Round 2, participants were shown the ratings of the other participants from Round 1 and asked to rate the items again with the choice of changing their original ratings. Consensus was defined as more than 70% of participants rating an item as critical (rating of 7-9) or not important (rating of 1-3). Items without consensus were discussed in a final consensus meeting. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 107 participants from 14 countries completed the survey. After both rounds, 50 of 56 items reached consensus. Following the consensus meeting, a final list of 52 indicators was agreed upon. These were grouped into five sectors: city administration (e.g., policy, leadership, budget), community (e.g., peer support, breastfeeding rooms), health care (e.g., hospital, clinic, pharmacy), workplace (e.g., time, space), and collaboration. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Using a systematic approach, we identified a comprehensive list of indicators that reflect the warm chain. These indicators offer cities a practical framework for evaluating and strengthening breastfeeding-friendly environments, with the potential to improve global breastfeeding outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15568253251376671\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15568253251376671","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:母乳喂养友好型城市是指具有同步和有利的母乳喂养环境的城市。一项范围审查和对母乳喂养母亲的访谈确定了许多潜在的指标,以成为一个母乳喂养友好的城市。目的:通过协商一致确定一套母乳友好城市的指标。方法:对专家、政策制定者和家庭三个利益相关者群体进行了改进的两轮在线德尔菲调查。在第一轮中,参与者对从早期研究中确定的52个潜在指标进行评级。他们还被要求提出其他指标。在第二轮中,研究人员向参与者展示了第一轮中其他参与者的评分,并要求他们再次对这些项目进行评分,可以选择改变他们原来的评分。共识被定义为超过70%的参与者将一个项目评为关键(7-9分)或不重要(1-3分)。在最后协商一致会议上讨论了没有协商一致意见的项目。结果:共有来自14个国家的107名参与者完成了调查。经过两轮谈判,56个议题中有50个达成共识。在协商一致会议之后,商定了52项指标的最后清单。这些被分为五个部门:城市管理(如政策、领导、预算)、社区(如同伴支持、母乳喂养室)、卫生保健(如医院、诊所、药房)、工作场所(如时间、空间)和协作。结论:采用系统方法,我们确定了反映暖链的综合指标列表。这些指标为城市提供了一个评估和加强有利于母乳喂养环境的实用框架,有可能改善全球母乳喂养结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying the Core Indicators of a Breastfeeding-Friendly City: A Delphi Study.

Background: A breastfeeding-friendly city is one with a synchronous and enabling environment for breastfeeding. A scoping review and interviews with breastfeeding mothers identified numerous potential indicators of a breastfeeding-friendly city. Objective: To determine a set of indicators of a breastfeeding-friendly city through consensus. Methods: A modified two-round online Delphi survey was conducted with three stakeholder groups-experts, policymakers, and families. In Round 1, participants rated 52 potential indicators identified from earlier studies. They were asked to also suggest additional indicators. In Round 2, participants were shown the ratings of the other participants from Round 1 and asked to rate the items again with the choice of changing their original ratings. Consensus was defined as more than 70% of participants rating an item as critical (rating of 7-9) or not important (rating of 1-3). Items without consensus were discussed in a final consensus meeting. Results: A total of 107 participants from 14 countries completed the survey. After both rounds, 50 of 56 items reached consensus. Following the consensus meeting, a final list of 52 indicators was agreed upon. These were grouped into five sectors: city administration (e.g., policy, leadership, budget), community (e.g., peer support, breastfeeding rooms), health care (e.g., hospital, clinic, pharmacy), workplace (e.g., time, space), and collaboration. Conclusion: Using a systematic approach, we identified a comprehensive list of indicators that reflect the warm chain. These indicators offer cities a practical framework for evaluating and strengthening breastfeeding-friendly environments, with the potential to improve global breastfeeding outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Medicine
Breastfeeding Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols. Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes: Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols Health consequences of artificial feeding Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother Breastfeeding indications and contraindications Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity International public health issues including social and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信