栓塞性基底动脉闭塞的椎动脉优势模式:对栓塞轨迹的见解。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Daryl Goldman, Emery Monnig, Amol Mehta, Christopher P Kellner, J Mocco, Johanna Fifi, Reade De Leacy, Hazem Shoirah, Shahram Majidi, Mehrdad Emami, Michael Travis Caton, Tomoyoshi Shigematsu
{"title":"栓塞性基底动脉闭塞的椎动脉优势模式:对栓塞轨迹的见解。","authors":"Daryl Goldman, Emery Monnig, Amol Mehta, Christopher P Kellner, J Mocco, Johanna Fifi, Reade De Leacy, Hazem Shoirah, Shahram Majidi, Mehrdad Emami, Michael Travis Caton, Tomoyoshi Shigematsu","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01566-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Embolic basilar artery occlusion (eBAO) is less common than embolic anterior circulation stroke. The anatomic basis for this discrepancy is not understood. Vertebral artery dominance (VAD) correlates with blood flow to the basilar artery. We hypothesized that left VAD is less common in eBAO, as the right vertebral artery is the more proximal to the heart in typical aortic arch anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center, case-control study identified cases of eBAO. Right, left, and co-dominant (RVAD, LVAD, and CVAD) prevalence was calculated in standardized fashion by CTA. To estimate the VAD prevalence in asymptomatic patients, a systematic review and metanalysis was performed. The pooled estimate of VAD prevalence in the asymptomatic group was compared to the eBAO cohort using χ<sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 72 eBAO were identified in the institutional cohort, and prevalence of LVAD, RVAD, and CVAD was 23.6%, 33.3%, and 43.1% respectively. Systematic review included eight studies and 1813 asymptomatic patients. Mean VAD prevalence in the asymptomatic population was LVAD 47.0% (39.0-55.1%), RVAD 26.9% (22.7-31.5%), and CVAD 25.9% (18.8-34.7%). VAD proportions differed significantly in the eBAO group (p < 0.001), with lower proportion of LVAD (OR 0.37, CI 0.20-0.67, p < 0.001), higher proportion of CVAD (OR 1.89, CI 1.13-3.13, p = 0.01) but no difference in RVAD (1.39, CI 0.81-2.35, p = 0.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LVAD is significantly less common in patients with eBAO compared to asymptomatic patients. Non-LVAD anatomy (RVAD and CVAD) may represent a novel anatomic risk factor for eBAO. This finding could influence techniques for endovascular thrombectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vertebral Artery Dominance Patterns in Embolic Basilar Artery Occlusion: Insights Toward Embolus Trajectory.\",\"authors\":\"Daryl Goldman, Emery Monnig, Amol Mehta, Christopher P Kellner, J Mocco, Johanna Fifi, Reade De Leacy, Hazem Shoirah, Shahram Majidi, Mehrdad Emami, Michael Travis Caton, Tomoyoshi Shigematsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00062-025-01566-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Embolic basilar artery occlusion (eBAO) is less common than embolic anterior circulation stroke. The anatomic basis for this discrepancy is not understood. Vertebral artery dominance (VAD) correlates with blood flow to the basilar artery. We hypothesized that left VAD is less common in eBAO, as the right vertebral artery is the more proximal to the heart in typical aortic arch anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center, case-control study identified cases of eBAO. Right, left, and co-dominant (RVAD, LVAD, and CVAD) prevalence was calculated in standardized fashion by CTA. To estimate the VAD prevalence in asymptomatic patients, a systematic review and metanalysis was performed. The pooled estimate of VAD prevalence in the asymptomatic group was compared to the eBAO cohort using χ<sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 72 eBAO were identified in the institutional cohort, and prevalence of LVAD, RVAD, and CVAD was 23.6%, 33.3%, and 43.1% respectively. Systematic review included eight studies and 1813 asymptomatic patients. Mean VAD prevalence in the asymptomatic population was LVAD 47.0% (39.0-55.1%), RVAD 26.9% (22.7-31.5%), and CVAD 25.9% (18.8-34.7%). VAD proportions differed significantly in the eBAO group (p < 0.001), with lower proportion of LVAD (OR 0.37, CI 0.20-0.67, p < 0.001), higher proportion of CVAD (OR 1.89, CI 1.13-3.13, p = 0.01) but no difference in RVAD (1.39, CI 0.81-2.35, p = 0.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LVAD is significantly less common in patients with eBAO compared to asymptomatic patients. Non-LVAD anatomy (RVAD and CVAD) may represent a novel anatomic risk factor for eBAO. This finding could influence techniques for endovascular thrombectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01566-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01566-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:栓塞性基底动脉闭塞(eBAO)较栓塞性前循环卒中少见。这种差异的解剖学基础尚不清楚。椎动脉优势(VAD)与血液流向基底动脉相关。我们假设左侧VAD在eBAO中不太常见,因为在典型的主动脉弓解剖中,右侧椎动脉更靠近心脏。方法:本研究为回顾性、单中心、病例对照研究。通过CTA以标准化方式计算右、左和共显性(RVAD、LVAD和CVAD)患病率。为了估计无症状患者的VAD患病率,进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。无症状组VAD患病率合并估计值与eBAO组比较,采用χ2检验。结果:在机构队列中共发现72例eBAO, LVAD、RVAD和CVAD的患病率分别为23.6%、33.3%和43.1%。系统评价纳入8项研究和1813例无症状患者。无症状人群中VAD的平均患病率为LVAD 47.0% (39.0 ~ 55.1%), RVAD 26.9% (22.7 ~ 31.5%), CVAD 25.9%(18.8 ~ 34.7%)。结论:与无症状患者相比,eBAO患者LVAD的发生率明显低于eBAO患者。非左室辅助功能(RVAD和CVAD)可能是eBAO的一个新的解剖危险因素。这一发现可能影响血管内取栓技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vertebral Artery Dominance Patterns in Embolic Basilar Artery Occlusion: Insights Toward Embolus Trajectory.

Purpose: Embolic basilar artery occlusion (eBAO) is less common than embolic anterior circulation stroke. The anatomic basis for this discrepancy is not understood. Vertebral artery dominance (VAD) correlates with blood flow to the basilar artery. We hypothesized that left VAD is less common in eBAO, as the right vertebral artery is the more proximal to the heart in typical aortic arch anatomy.

Methods: This retrospective single-center, case-control study identified cases of eBAO. Right, left, and co-dominant (RVAD, LVAD, and CVAD) prevalence was calculated in standardized fashion by CTA. To estimate the VAD prevalence in asymptomatic patients, a systematic review and metanalysis was performed. The pooled estimate of VAD prevalence in the asymptomatic group was compared to the eBAO cohort using χ2 test.

Results: In total, 72 eBAO were identified in the institutional cohort, and prevalence of LVAD, RVAD, and CVAD was 23.6%, 33.3%, and 43.1% respectively. Systematic review included eight studies and 1813 asymptomatic patients. Mean VAD prevalence in the asymptomatic population was LVAD 47.0% (39.0-55.1%), RVAD 26.9% (22.7-31.5%), and CVAD 25.9% (18.8-34.7%). VAD proportions differed significantly in the eBAO group (p < 0.001), with lower proportion of LVAD (OR 0.37, CI 0.20-0.67, p < 0.001), higher proportion of CVAD (OR 1.89, CI 1.13-3.13, p = 0.01) but no difference in RVAD (1.39, CI 0.81-2.35, p = 0.22).

Conclusion: LVAD is significantly less common in patients with eBAO compared to asymptomatic patients. Non-LVAD anatomy (RVAD and CVAD) may represent a novel anatomic risk factor for eBAO. This finding could influence techniques for endovascular thrombectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信